About: Market-based environmental policy instruments is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 7 publications have been published within this topic receiving 932 citations.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus exclusively on the second component, the means -the "instruments" of environmental policy, and consider, in particular, experience around the world with the relatively new breed of economic-incentive or market-based policy instruments.
Abstract: Environmental policies typically combine the identification of a goal with some means to achieve that goal. This chapter focuses exclusively on the second component, the means – the “instruments” – of environmental policy, and considers, in particular, experience around the world with the relatively new breed of economic-incentive or market-based policy instruments. I define these instruments broadly, and consider them within four categories: charge systems; tradable permits; market friction reductions; and government subsidy reductions. Within charge systems, I consider effluent charges, deposit-refund systems, user charges, insurance premium taxes, sales taxes, administrative charges, and tax differentiation. Within tradeable permit systems, I consider both credit programs and cap-and-trade systems. Under the heading of reducing market frictions, I examine market creation, liability rules, and information programs. Finally, under reducing government subsidies, I review a number of specific examples from around the world. By defining market-based instruments broadly, I cast a large net for this review of applications. As a consequence, the review is extensive. But this should not leave the impression that market-based instruments have replaced, or have come anywhere close to replacing, the conventional, command-and-control approach to environmental protection. Further, even where these approaches have been used in their purest form and with some success, such as in the case of tradeable-permit systems in the United States, they have not always performed as anticipated. In the final part of the chapter, I ask what lessons can be learned from our experiences. In particular, I consider normative lessons for design and implementation, analysis of prospective and adopted systems, and identification of new applications.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the second component, the means, of environmental policy, and consider, in particular, experience around the world with the relatively new breed of economic-incentive or market-based policy instruments.
Abstract: Environmental policies typically combine the identification of a goal with some means to achieve that goal. This paper, prepared as a chapter draft for the forthcoming Handbook of Environmental Economics, focuses exclusively on the second component, the means--the "instruments"--of environmental policy, and considers, in particular, experience around the world with the relatively new breed of economic-incentive or market-based policy instruments. I define these instruments broadly, and consider them within four categories: pollution charges; tradable permits; market barrier reductions; and government subsidy reductions. By defining market-based instruments broadly, I cast a large net for this review of applications. As a consequence, the review is extensive. But this should not leave the impression that market-based instruments have replaced, or have come anywhere close to replacing, the conventional, command-and-control approach to environmental protection. Further, even when and where these approaches have been used in their purest form and with some success, such as in the case of tradeable-permit systems in the United States, they have not always performed as anticipated. In the final part of the paper, I ask what lessons can be learned from our experiences. In particular, I consider normative lessons for: design and implementation; analysis of prospective and adopted systems; and identification of new applications.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the efficacy of price and quantity controls as environmental policy instruments in a stochastic setting in which agents are risk averse and demonstrate that the assumption of risk aversion may improve the performance of a tax relative to that of a system of tradable quotas.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the means of environmental policy and consider the Korean experience with the relatively new breed of economic-incentive or market-based policy instruments, such as charge system.
Abstract: This paper focuses on the means of environmental policy and considers, in particular, the Korean experience with the relatively new breed of economic-incentive or market-based policy instruments. Even though these policy instruments can be defined broadly, the author considers them with emphasis on charge system, which is the main market-based environmental instrument in Korea. Within charge system, he considers effluent charge, deposit-refund system, environmental improvement charge and water quality improvement charge. This study gives the impression that economic-incentive instruments have not replaced, or have not come close to replacing, the conventional, command-and-control approach to environmental protection in Korea. But, despite this situation, market-based instruments have moved center stage, and they are considered seriously for each environmental problem that is tackled by central and local governments in Korea. Market-based instruments will enjoy increasing acceptance in Korean environmental policy process in the years ahead.