Questioning Multilevel Models
Jan de Leeuw,Ita G. G. Kreft +1 more
TL;DR: It is concluded that more studies need to be done to establish the claimed superiority of restricted versus unrestricted maximum likelihood, to study the effects of shrinkage on the estimators, and to explore the merits of simpler methods such as weighted least squares.
read more
Abstract: In this article, practical problems with multilevel techniques are discussed. These problems, brought to our attention by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), have to do with terminology, computer programs employing different algorithms, and interpretations of the coefficients in one or two steps. We discuss the usefulness of the hierarchical linear model (HM) in the most common situation in education-that of a large number of relatively small groups. We also point to situations where the more complicated HMs can be replaced with simpler models, with statistical properties that are easier to study. We conclude that more studies need to be done to establish the claimed superiority of restricted versus unrestricted maximum likelihood, to study the effects of shrinkage on the estimators, and to explore the merits of simpler methods such as weighted least squares. Finally, distinctions must be made between choice of model, choice of technique, choice of algorithm, and choice of computer program. While HMs are an elegant conceptualization, they are not always necessary. Traditional techniques perform as well, or better, if there are large groups and small intraclass correlations, and if the researcher is interested only in the fixedlevel regression coefficients. In this article, we discuss some of the practical problems in using multilevel techniques, by looking into the choices users of these techniques have to make. It is difficult, of course, to define "user." Different users have different degrees of statistical background, computer literacy, experience, and so on. We adopt a particular operational definition of a "user" in this article, which certainly does not cover all users. Our "user" is defined by the set of questions asked by the Statistical Standards and Methodology Division of the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). These questions were asked in the context of a grant, which has as one of its specific purposes to evaluate the practical usefulness of multilevel modeling in educational statistics. We cannot discuss, let alone answer, all the questions from NCES in this article. Even the ones we discuss will usually require additional statistical and computational research, but they illustrate some of the practical methodological problems in using hierarchical linear models.' The statistics and mathematics will be kept as simple as possible. We shall concentrate on the situation in which we have a relatively large number of relatively small groups. The situation in which we have only two or three groups does not really interest us here, and the situation in which we have
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Multilevel Analyses of Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Context and Health Outcomes: a Critical Review
Kate E. Pickett,M Pearl +1 more
TL;DR: The evidence for modest neighbourhood effects on health is fairly consistent despite heterogeneity of study designs, substitution of local area measures for neighbourhood measures and probable measurement error.
2.4K
The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives
Dominique Lord,Fred L. Mannering +1 more
TL;DR: In the absence of detailed driving data that would help improve the identification of cause and effect relationships with individual vehicle crashes, most researchers have addressed this problem by framing it in terms of understanding the factors that affect the frequency of crashes -the number of crashes occurring in some geographical space (usually a roadway segment or intersection) over some specified time period as mentioned in this paper.
1.7K
Modeling Multilevel Data Structures
TL;DR: The logic and statistical theory behind multilevel models are introduced, to illustrate how such models can be applied fruitfully in political science, and to call attention to some of the pitfalls in multileVEL analysis.
1.6K
Multilevel analysis in public health research
TL;DR: The rationale for using multilevel analysis in public health research is reviewed, the statistical methodology is summarized, and some of the research questions that have been addressed using these methods are highlighted.
Mood and Emotions in Small Groups and Work Teams
Janice R. Kelly,Sigal G. Barsade +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, an organizing model for understanding affective influences and their effects on group life is proposed, where individual-level affective characteristics that members bring to their groups: moods, emotions, sentiments, and emotional intelligence.
1K
References
The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.
Reuben M. Baron,David A. Kenny +1 more
TL;DR: This article seeks to make theorists and researchers aware of the importance of not using the terms moderator and mediator interchangeably by carefully elaborating the many ways in which moderators and mediators differ, and delineates the conceptual and strategic implications of making use of such distinctions with regard to a wide range of phenomena.
•Book
Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
Leona S. Aiken,Stephen G. West +1 more
- 01 Jan 1991
TL;DR: In this article, the effects of predictor scaling on the coefficients of regression equations are investigated. But, they focus mainly on the effect of predictors scaling on coefficients of regressions.
36.7K
Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
TL;DR: In this article, multiple regression is used to test and interpret multiple regression interactions in the context of multiple-agent networks. But it is not suitable for single-agent systems, as discussed in this paper.
17.4K
Analysis of Panel Data.
James Davidson,Cheng Hsiao +1 more
TL;DR: The authors provides a comprehensive, coherent, and intuitive review of panel data methodologies that are useful for empirical analysis, including correlated random coefficient models, pseudo-panels, duration and count data models, quantile analysis, and alternative approaches for controlling the impact of unobserved heterogeneity in nonlinear panel data models.
4.9K
Maximum Likelihood Approaches to Variance Component Estimation and to Related Problems
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed a restricted maximum likelihood (reml) approach which takes into account the loss in degrees of freedom resulting from estimating fixed effects, and developed a satisfactory asymptotic theory for estimators of variance components.
2.6K
Related Papers (5)
Ita G. G. Kreft,Jan de Leeuw +1 more
- 01 Jan 1998
Joop J. Hox
- 01 Apr 2002
Ramon C Littell
- 16 Jul 1996