Sarcobatus

Abstract: Predawn plant water potential (Ψw, measured with leaf psychrometers) and surrogate measurements made with the pressure chamber (termed Ψpc here) are used to infer comparative ecological performance, based on the expectation that these plant potentials reflect the wettest soil Ψw accessed by roots. There is growing evidence, however, that some species exhibit substantial predawn disequilibrium (PDD), defined as plant Ψw or Ψpc at predawn substantially more negative than the Ψw of soil accessed by roots. In the western Great Basin desert, the magnitude of PDD calculated as soil Ψw minus predawn leaf Ψw was as large as 1.4 and 2.7 MPa for two codominant shrub species, Chrysothamnus nauseosus and Sarcobatus vermiculatus, respectively. The magnitude of PDD calculated as soil Ψw minus predawn Ψpc was smaller, up to 0.6 and 2.1 MPa for Chrysothamnus and Sarcobatus, respectively. For both species, mechanisms contributing to PDD included nighttime transpiration and putative leaf apoplastic solutes, but not hydraul...

Abstract: Many terrestrial ecosystems are nutrient limited. Koerselman and Meuleman (1996) proposed critical foliar N:P values that could predict wetland nutrient deficiencies (N:P 16, P limitation). Although critical N:P values have potential as ecological and diagnostic tools, species differences in N and P requirements must be tested. The objectives of our experiments were 1) to determine if two desert species share critical N:P values, and 2) to assess the N:P tool's applicability in a non-wetland system. We studied two common, co-occurring North American desert shrubs, Chrysothamnus nauseosus spp. consimilis and Sarcobatus vermiculatus. Based on leaf N and P concentrations, effective mycorrhizal status, and leaf N:P, we predicted Chrysothamnus would be N limited and Sarcobatus would be P limited. During the 2000 and 2001 growing seasons, juvenile shrubs received N, P, N+P, or control treatments. To assess interaction with water limitation, other shrubs were irrigated and fertilized in 2001 (N+IR, P+IR, N+P+IR, control IR). Contrary to the predicted N limitation in Chrysothamnus, stem growth was 1.7-fold greater in P+IR plants relative to IR controls, although without irrigation Chrysothamnus did not respond to P addition. Also, contrary to the predicted P limitation in Sarcobatus, stem growth was 2.7-fold and 1.5-fold greater in N and N+IR plants, respectively, relative to their controls. Leaf N was significantly higher in N-treated Sarcobatus, both with and without irrigation. Our study suggests species-specific critical N:P values and that the N:P tool does not effectively predict desert shrub nutrient limitations. Species adapted to low nutrient conditions may not respond to increased nutrient availability due to water and nutrient co-limitation, lack of plasticity, or lower tissue nutrient requirements.

Abstract: Summary 1 We investigated experimentally differences in abiotic stress tolerance and the effects of plant–plant interactions for two desert shrubs, Chrysothamnus nauseosus and Sarcobatus vermiculatus, along a soil salinity (NaCl) and boron (B) gradient at Mono Lake, California, USA. Based on differences in natural distribution, and the classical expectation of a trade-off between competitive ability and stress tolerance, we hypothesized that (i) Chrysothamnus would have greater competitive ability than Sarcobatus at the low salinity end of the gradient, and that (ii) Sarcobatus would be more stress tolerant than Chrysothamnus. 2 Juvenile target plants of Chrysothamnus and Sarcobatus were planted into four sites along the gradient. Biomass was determined by destructive harvests over two growing seasons. At each site, interspecific relative competitive ability was assessed as the effect of Sarcobatus neighbours on Chrysothamnus targets compared to the effect of Chrysothamnus neighbours on Sarcobatus targets. Stress tolerance was assessed as the ability of each species to survive and grow, in the absence of neighbours, at different sites along the gradient. 3 The two species did not differ in the relative strength of plant–plant interactions, providing no support for the expectation that Chrysothamnus had greater competitive ability than Sarcobatus. Furthermore, there was no evidence for competition or facilitation, either interspecific or intraspecific, at any site in either year of the study. However, fertilization treatments demonstrated nutrient limitations, soil water reached limiting levels and root systems of targets and neighbours overlapped substantially. It is therefore surprising that plant–plant interactions among juveniles apparently play little role in the growth and survival of shrubs in this saline desert habitat. 4 Sarcobatus was more stress tolerant than Chrysothamnus and the two species performed optimally at different sites along the gradient. Sarcobatus juveniles grew best at the two most saline sites and survived at all sites, whereas Chrysothamnus juveniles grew best at a low-salinity site and did not survive at the most saline site. The difference in site of optimal performance may be due to differences in nutrient limitations or to interactions between nutrient availability and sodium (Na) and B tolerance.