TL;DR: In this article, the authors trace some key elements of the neoliberal approach to housing and its impact on the enjoyment of the right to housing in different contexts and times, taking the World Bank's 1993 manifesto as a starting point and the subprime crisis as its first great international flashpoint.
Abstract: Over the last few decades we have witnessed a global U-turn in prevailing housing and urban policy agendas, spread around the world by the driving forces of globalization and neoliberalism The new paradigm was mainly based on the withdrawal of states from the housing sector and the implementation of policies designed to create stronger and larger market-based housing finance models The commodification of housing, together with the increased use of housing as an investment asset within a globalized financial market, has profoundly affected the enjoyment of the right to adequate housing Taking the World Bank's 1993 manifesto as a starting point and the subprime crisis as its first great international flashpoint, this essay traces some key elements of the neoliberal approach to housing and its impact on the enjoyment of the right to housing in different contexts and times The reform of housing policy — with all its components of homeownership, private property and binding financial commitments — has been central to the political and ideological strategies through which the dominance of neoliberalism is maintained Conversely, the crisis (and its origins in the housing market) reflects the inability of market mechanisms to provide adequate and affordable housing for all
TL;DR: Eide et al. as mentioned in this paper proposed concepts and principles for economic, social and cultural rights in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICEHR), including the right to an Adequate Standard of Living (ASL) and the Right to Food.
Abstract: Part 1 Concepts and Principles: 1. Economic, Social and Cultural Rights - a Universal Challenge, A. Eide, A. Rosas. 2. Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as Human Rights, A. Eide. 3. Economic and Social Rights as Legal Rights, M. Scheinin. 4. Cultural Rights and Universal Human Rights, R. Stavenhagen. 5. The Right of Self-Determination, A. Rosas. Part 2 Selected Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: 6. The Right to an Adequate Standard of Living Including the Right to Food, A. Eide. 7. The Right to Housing, S. Leckie. 8. Health Rights, K. Tomasevski. 9. The Right to Property, C. Krause. 10. The Right to Social Security, M. Scheinin. 11. The Right to Work and Rights in Work, K. Drzewicki. 12. The Right to Education, M. Nowak. 13. The Right to Human Rights Education, G. Alfredsson. 14. Cultural Rights as Individual Human Rights, A. Eide. Part 3 Contested Rights: 15. So-Called Rights of the Third Generation, A. Rosas. 16. The Right to Development, A. Rosas. 17. Environmental Rights, K. Tomasevski. 18. Women, K. Tomasevski. 19. Children, T. Hammarberg. 20. Minorities and Indigenous Peoples, A.-C. Bloch. 21. Immigrants and Migrant Workers, J. Niessen. 22. Armed Conflicts, A. Rosas, M. Sandvik. Part 4 Implementation: 23. Implementation Mechanisms and Remedies, A. Rosas, M. Scheinin. 24. Obstacles and Goals to be Pursued, A. Eide. 24. Indicators, K. Tomasevski. 26. International Development Finance Agencies, K. Tomasevski. 27. Technical Assistance and Advisory Services, G. Alfredsson. Annex 1: Revised Guidelines regarding the Form and Contents of Reports to be Submitted by States Parties under Articles 16 and 17 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Annex 2: General Comments of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Annex 3: Selected General Comments of the Human Rights Committee.
TL;DR: Newell et al. as discussed by the authors introduced the political economy of resources and the cultural politics of rights: challenges for accountability, and argued that human rights make a difference to poor and vulnerable people.
Abstract: * Contents * 1. Rights, resources and the politics of accountability: An introduction -- Peter Newell and Joanna Wheeler * 2. Taking accountability into account: The debate so far -- Peter Newell * Part 1: Rights and resources * Overview: The political economy of resources and the cultural politics of rights: challenges for accountability -- Peter Newell and Joanna Wheeler * 3. Do human rights make a difference to poor and vulnerable people? Accountability for the right to water in South Africa -- Lyla Mehta * 4. Managing watersheds and the right to water: Indigenous communities in search of accountability and inclusion in Southern Veracruz -- Luisa Pare and Carlos Robles * 5. Conflicting rights, environmental agendas, and the challenges of accountability: social mobilisation and protected natural areas in Mexico -- Luisa Pare and Carlos Cortez * 6. From Protest to Proactive Action: Building Institutional Accountability Through Struggles for the Right to Housing -- Celestine Nyamu * 7. Rights to health and struggles for accountability in a Brazilian municipal health council -- Andrea Cornwall, Silvia Cordeiro and Nelson Giordano Delgado * Part 2: Investor accountabilities * Overview: Rights, resources, and investor accountability -- Peter Newell and Joanna Wheeler * 8. Corporate accountability and citizen action: Cases from India -- Peter Newell with Vaijanyanta Anand, Hasrat Arjjumend, Harsh Jaitli, Sampath Kumar and A.B.S.V. Ranga Rao * 9. Environmental injustice, law and accountability -- Rohit Lekhi and Peter Newell 10. Oil and accountability issues in the Niger Delta -- Oga Steve Abah and Jenks Zakari Okwori * 11. Compliance versus accountability: Struggles for dignity and daily bread in the Bangladesh garment industry -- Simeen Mahmud and Naila Kabeer * 12. Accountability begins at home: The living wage movement in the United States -- Stephanie Luce
TL;DR: In this article, two alternative interpretations of a right to housing are suggested, each related to a certain logic of housing provision, each of which is best seen as a social right in Marshall's meaning of an obligation of the state towards society as a whole.
Abstract: The article contributes to two central and interrelated discourses in welfare state theory and housing policy. One concerns the meaning of a ‘right to housing’, and the other concerns the meaning of the dichotomy ‘universal’–‘selective’ in housing policy. The right to housing is best seen as a political ‘marker of concern’ pointing out housing as an area for welfare state policy. The more precise meaning of the idea is always defined socially, in a specific national context of relations between state, citizen, and markets in housing provision. Two alternative interpretations of a right to housing are suggested, each related to a certain logic of housing provision. In a selective housing policy, the state provides a ‘protected’ complement to the general housing market, and the right to housing implies some legalistic minimum rights for households of lesser means. In a universal housing policy, the state provides correctives to the general housing market in order to make housing available to all types of households, and the right to housing is best seen as a social right in Marshall’s meaning of an obligation of the state towards society as a whole. The concepts of ‘universal’ and ‘selective’ may be applied to either the political discourse or the social outcome of policies. Furthermore, they may refer to different political levels (e.g. welfare state level, sector level, and policy instrument level). If the dichotomy is not specified in those two respects, the distinction between a universal and a selective policy will always be seriously blurred.
TL;DR: In this article, a decolocalization of radical politics in the context of housing and the city has been proposed, in a way that encompasses what Westernized and masculine takes on "radical politics" make of them.
Abstract: Urbanites worldwide fight for their right to housing and the city in ways that encompass what Westernized and masculine takes on ‘radical politics’ make of them. This intervention proposes a decolo...