TL;DR: The microbial quality of five types of fresh produce obtained at the retail level was determined by standard quantitative techniques, which included aerobic plate count (APC), total coliform counts, Escherichia coli counts, and yeast and mold counts.
TL;DR: Triplicate bulk tank milk samples collected and analyzed for total bacterial count and presumptive streptococcus, gram-negative, and staphylococcus counts indicated a lack of significant variation among the triplicate samples, suggesting that one sample can reliably gauge the microbial status of the entire bulk tank.
TL;DR: The results of this study indicate that selective DCT based on results obtained by the Petrifilm on-farm culture system enabled a reduction in the use of DCT without negatively affecting milk production and milk quality.
TL;DR: The results indicated that all five methods were highly comparable, with the exception of Petrifilm versus Spiral Plate System, which was 0.88, and exhibited a high degree of accuracy and agreement.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used 3M E. coli/coliform count plates (3M, Minneapolis, MN), previously validated for enumerating E coli in food, to test environmental water samples enumerated with Petrifilm were significantly correlated (R > 0.9; slope = 0. 9-1.0; p < 0.001).
Abstract: Escherichia coli is often monitored in environmental waters as an indicator of the possible presence of human pathogens associated with feces. Petrifilm E. coli/coliform count plates (3M, Minneapolis, MN), previously validated for enumerating E. coli in food, were tested for monitoring E. coli in environmental water. Escherichia coli counts in environmental water samples enumerated with Petrifilm were significantly correlated (R > 0.9; slope = 0.9-1.0; p < 0.001) with counts obtained with three commonly used methods, mTEC (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD), m-ColiBlue (Hach, Loveland, CO), and Colilert-18/IDEXX Quanti-Tray 2000 (IDEXX, Westbrook, ME). Blue colonies on Petrifilm plates were most reliably identified as E. coli when accompanied by gas formation, as determined by characterization of the colonies on MacConkey agar plates (PML Microbiologicals, Mississauga, ON, Canada) and by polymerase chair reaction (PCR) with E. coli-specific primers. The main disadvantage of Petrifilm plates for environmental water testing is the small volume (1 mL per sample) that can be tested; however, the plates appear to be suitable for screening and locating sites that exceed criteria for total body and partial body contact. Simplicity of use and storage, reliability, and relatively low cost make Petrifilm plates suitable for volunteer-based and educational water quality monitoring applications, particularly when used as a preliminary screening method to identify problem sites.