Habitual offender

Abstract: The idea of selective incapacitation and the distinction between prevalence and incidence (participation and lambda) justify the search for a group of offenders whose criminality does not decline with age and who may be identified solely on the basis of legally relevant variables. This paper questions such research, arguing that the decline in age with crime characterizes even the most active offenders. and that the distinction between incidence and prevalence does not deserve the theoretical, research, or policy attention it has been claimed to merit (Farrington, 1985; Blumstein and Graddy, 1981–1982). In doing so, it relies on research results widely accepted in criminology. Thus, the current focus of criminological research on the “career criminal,” on selective incapacitation, and on longitudinal research remains unjustified.

Abstract: As legislatures proliferate novel "enhancements" to criminal sentencing, such as "three-strikes" and related provisions, and as criminologists debate their effects, the role of existing enhancements, such as habitual offender statutes, has received little empirical attention. This article explores the effect of race in the decision to prosecute and sentence eligible defendants as "habitual" offenders. During FY 1992-93, 9,690 males admitted to prison in Florida were statutorily eligible (two prior felony convictions or one prior violent felony conviction) for sentencing as "habitual" offenders. Approximately 20% received that disposition. They will serve at least 75% of their enhanced sentence as compared with the state average of about 40%. Logistic regression, controlling for prior record, crime seriousness, and other relevant factors, shows a significant and substantial race effect. The disadvantage of black defendants is particularly strong for drug offenses and for property crimes that have relatively high victimization rates for whites (larceny, burglary). Race is less consequential for violent and weapons-related crimes. Race effects are more often significant in sentencing contexts that are low in terms of percent black, racial income inequality, drug arrest rates, and violent crime rates. The relevance of these findings for a "racial threat" interpretation of sentencing outcomes is discussed.

Abstract: Part One: Thinking clearly about crime. The paradox of crime in the 1980s. Models of criminal justice. The going rate. The career criminal. Part Two: Get tough: the conservative attack on crime. Lock 'em up. Deterrence. Unleash the cops. Close the loopholes. Protect the victims. Part Three: Guns and gun crimes: the middle ground. Controlling handguns. Part Four: Reform the liberal prescription. Rehabilitation. Reform the law: decriminalization. Reform the system: eliminate injustice. Reform society: provide opportunity. Part Five: Conclusion.