About: Globular protein is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 3674 publications have been published within this topic receiving 236709 citations. The topic is also known as: globular proteins & spheroprotein.
TL;DR: An analysis of the solvent content of 116 different crystal forms of globular proteins found that in many cases this range will be sufficiently restrictive to enable the probable number of molecules in the crystallographic asymmetric unit to be determined directly from the molecular weight of the protein and the space group and unit cell dimensions of the crystal.
TL;DR: In this article, a method for calculating accurate molar extinction coefficients for proteins at 280 nm, simply from knowledge of the amino acid composition, was presented, and the method was calibrated against 18 "normal" globular proteins.
TL;DR: This paper discusses the physical properties of polypeptides, the structure of which has been determined Crystallographically to High Resolution and its role in the biosynthesis of Proteins.
Abstract: Chemical Properties of Polypeptides Biosynthesis of Proteins Evolutionary and Genetic Origins of Protein Sequences Physical Interactions that Determine the Properties of Proteins Conformational Properties of Polypeptide Chains The Folded Conformations of Globular Proteins Proteins in Solution and in Membranes Interactions with Other Molecules Enzyme Catalysis Degradation Appendix: References to Protein Structures Determined Crystallographically to High Resolution
TL;DR: This method was used to delineate coiled-coil domains in otherwise globular proteins, such as the leucine zipper domains in transcriptional regulators, and to predict regions of discontinuity within coiled -coil structures,such as the hinge region in myosin.
Abstract: The probability that a residue in a protein is part of a coiled-coil structure was assessed by comparison of its flanking sequences with sequences of known coiled-coil proteins. This method was used to delineate coiled-coil domains in otherwise globular proteins, such as the leucine zipper domains in transcriptional regulators, and to predict regions of discontinuity within coiled-coil structures, such as the hinge region in myosin. More than 200 proteins that probably have coiled-coil domains were identified in GenBank, including alpha- and beta-tubulins, flagellins, G protein beta subunits, some bacterial transfer RNA synthetases, and members of the heat shock protein (Hsp70) family.
TL;DR: The present review aims to provide a reassessment of the factors important for folding in light of current knowledge, including contributions to the free energy of folding arising from electrostatics, hydrogen-bonding and van der Waals interactions, intrinsic propensities, and hydrophobic interactions.
Abstract: T e purpose of this review is to assess the nature and magnitudes of the dominant forces in protein folding. Since proteins are only marginally stable at room temperature,’ no type of molecular interaction is unimportant, and even small interactions can contribute significantly (positively or negatively) to stability (Alber, 1989a,b; Matthews, 1987a,b). However, the present review aims to identify only the largest forces that lead to the structural features of globular proteins: their extraordinary compactness, their core of nonpolar residues, and their considerable amounts of internal architecture. This review explores contributions to the free energy of folding arising from electrostatics (classical charge repulsions and ion pairing), hydrogen-bonding and van der Waals interactions, intrinsic propensities, and hydrophobic interactions. An earlier review by Kauzmann (1959) introduced the importance of hydrophobic interactions. His insights were particularly remarkable considering that he did not have the benefit of known protein structures, model studies, high-resolution calorimetry, mutational methods, or force-field or statistical mechanical results. The present review aims to provide a reassessment of the factors important for folding in light of current knowledge. Also considered here are the opposing forces, conformational entropy and electrostatics. The process of protein folding has been known for about 60 years. In 1902, Emil Fischer and Franz Hofmeister independently concluded that proteins were chains of covalently linked amino acids (Haschemeyer & Haschemeyer, 1973) but deeper understanding of protein structure and conformational change was hindered because of the difficulty in finding conditions for solubilization. Chick and Martin (191 1) were the first to discover the process of denaturation and to distinguish it from the process of aggregation. By 1925, the denaturation process was considered to be either hydrolysis of the peptide bond (Wu & Wu, 1925; Anson & Mirsky, 1925) or dehydration of the protein (Robertson, 1918). The view that protein denaturation was an unfolding process was