TL;DR: In this article, the dimensions of a Phenomenology of science in Husserl and the Young Dr. Heidegger are discussed, and a discussion of the relationship between science and philosophy is presented.
Abstract: (1973). On the Dimensions of a Phenomenology of Science in Husserl and the Young Dr. Heidegger. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology: Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 217-234.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the distinction between individuals and their aspect in the Problem of Knowledge and the difference between Essences and their instances in the meaning of being, and the nature of existence.
Abstract: Preface Part 1: The Background 1. Descartes: A New Conception of the Mind 2. Brentano: The Thesis of Intentionality 3. Kierkegaard: A Different Conception of Man Part 2: Edmund Husserl: The Problem of Knowledge 4. The Distinction Between Particulars and Universals 5. Husserl's Early View on Numbers 6. Husserl's Distinction Between Essences and Their Instances 7. Husserl's Distinction Between Individuals and Their Aspects 8. The Phenomenological Method Part 3: Martin Heidegger: The Meaning of Being 9. Heidegger's Project 10. Modes of Being 11. The Nature of Existence Part 4: Jean-Paul Sartre: The Quest for Freedom 12. The Structure of Mind 13. The Origin of Nothingness 14. The Pliancy of the Past
TL;DR: The present task is to show how to write intentionality, so central in Husserl's philosophy, into Quine's system of ontological naturalism and naturalized epistemology or into Heidegger's account of human being and existential phenomenology.
Abstract: Is consciousness or the subject part of the natural world or the human world? Can we write intentionality, so central in Husserl's philosophy, into Quine's system of ontological naturalism and naturalized epistemology — or into Heidegger's account of human being and existential phenomenology? The present task is to show how to do so. Anomalous monism provides a key.