Superhydrophobicity: Localized Parameters And Gradient Surfaces
Glen McHale,Stephen R. Elliott,Michael I. Newton,Neil Shirtcliffe +3 more
- 30 Sep 2009
- pp 217-234
TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider the case of a variation in Cassie-Baxter fraction across a surfac e possessing a homogeneous hydrophobic surface chemistry and discuss the conditions (droplet volume, surface hydrophobicity, gradient in superhydrophobi city and contact angle hysteresis) under which a dr oplet may be set into motion.
read more
Abstract: The use of Cassie and Baxter’s equation and that of Wenzel have been subject to some criticism of late . It has been suggested that researchers use these equations without always considering the assumptions that ha ve been made and sometimes apply them to cases that are not suitable. This debate has prompted a reconsideration of the derivation of these equation s using the concept of parameters for the Wenzel ro ughness and Cassie-Baxter solid surface fractions that are local to the three-phase contact lines. In such cir cumstances, we show the roughness and Cassie-Baxter solid fract ions depend not only on the substrate material, but also on which part of the substrate is being sampled by the three-phase contact lines of a given droplet. W e show that this is not simply a theoretical debate, but i s one which has direct consequences for experiments on surfaces where the roughness or spatial pattern var ies across the surface. We use the approach to deri ve formulae for the contact angle observed on a double length scale surface under the assumption that the smallscale features on the peaks of larger scale feature s are either wetted or non-wetted. We also discuss the case of curved and re-entrant surface features and how t hese bring the Young’s law contact angle into the f ormula for roughness and the condition for suspending drop lets without penetration into the surface. To illus trate the use of local parameters, we consider the case of a variation in Cassie-Baxter fraction across a surfac e possessing a homogeneous hydrophobic surface chemistry and discuss the conditions (droplet volume, surface hydrophobicity, gradient in superhydrophobi city and contact angle hysteresis) under which a dr oplet may be set into motion. We show that different con tact angles on each side of a droplet of water plac ed on such a surface can generate sufficient lateral forc e for the droplet to move towards the region of the surface with the lowest contact angle. Using an electrodepo sited copper surface with a radial gradient in superhydrophobicity we exemplify these ideas by showing experimentally that droplets enter into selfactuated motion and accumulate in the centre of the surface where the wettability is higher. In princi ple, paths can be defined and water droplets can be collected by creating such gradients in superhydrophobicity t hrough changes in the lateral topography of the surface.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
An introduction to superhydrophobicity
TL;DR: This paper is derived from a training session prepared for COST P21 and is intended as an introduction to superhydrophobicity to scientists who may not work in this area of physics or to students.
630
The superhydrophobicity of polymer surfaces: Recent developments
TL;DR: The field of superhydrophobicity research has reached a stage where huge numbers of candidate treatments have been proposed and jumps have been made in theoretically describing them as mentioned in this paper, and there now seems to be a move to more practical concerns and to considering the demands of individual applications instead of more general cases.
Apparent Contact Angles on Lubricant-Impregnated Surfaces/SLIPS: From Superhydrophobicity to Electrowetting.
TL;DR: This approach shows how Cassie-Baxter, Wenzel, hemiwicking, and other equations for rough, textured or complex geometry surfaces and for electrowetting and dielectrowetting can be used with the Young's law contact angle replaced by the apparent contact angle from the equivalent smooth lubricant-impregnated surface.
102
Surface topographies of biomimetic superamphiphobic materials: design criteria, fabrication and performance.
TL;DR: Significantly, the impalement pressure and formulated rules of various re-entrant profiles are recommended in detail and fabrication, outstanding performances such as mechanical durability, chemical stability are also mentioned according to different types of morphologies.
52
•Dissertation
Experimental studies of liquid marbles and superhydrophobic surfaces
S. J. Elliott
- 01 Jan 2009
TL;DR: In this article, the interaction of water droplets with hydrophobic or rough, super-hydrophobic solid surfaces has been studied and a measure of hydrophobicity is obtained from the angle between the liquid and solid surface measured from the solid through the liquid, known as the contact angle.
1
References
Contact angle, wettability, and adhesion
Frederick M. Fowkes,William A. Zisman +1 more
- 01 Jan 1964
TL;DR: Good as mentioned in this paper pointed out that Galileo in the 17 century was quite likely the first investigator to observe contact angle behavior with his experiment of floating a thin gold leaf on top of a water surface.
2K
Water‐repellent soil and its relationship to granularity, surface roughness and hydrophobicity: a materials science view
TL;DR: In this article, a simple model is developed for a hydrophobic granular surface and it is shown that this can provide a mechanism for enhancement of soil water repellency through the relative size and spacing of grains and pores.