Open AccessPosted Content
Robust reflection principles
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors study the extent to which certain reflection properties of large cardinals can be satisfied robustly by small cardinals and introduce natural strengthenings of these principles which are always robust and which hold at sufficiently large cardinal, and investigate the possibility of these strengthenings holding at small cardinal successors.
read more
Abstract: A cardinal $\lambda$ satisfies a property P robustly if, whenever $\mathbb{Q}$ is a forcing poset and $|\mathbb{Q}|^+ < \lambda$, $\lambda$ satisfies P in $V^{\mathbb{Q}}$. We study the extent to which certain reflection properties of large cardinals can be satisfied robustly by small cardinals. We focus in particular on stationary reflection and the tree property, both of which can consistently hold but fail to be robust at small cardinals. We introduce natural strengthenings of these principles which are always robust and which hold at sufficiently large cardinals, consider the extent to which these strengthenings are in fact stronger than the original principles, and investigate the possibility of these strengthenings holding at small cardinals, particularly at successors of singular cardinals.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
References
Squares, scales and stationary reflection
TL;DR: Interactions between these three theories in the context of singular cardinals are considered, focusing on the various implications between square and scales (a fundamental notion in PCF theory), and on consistency results between relatively strong forms of square and stationary set reflection.
234
•Book
Walks on ordinals and their characteristics
Stevo Todorcevic
- 01 Jan 2007
TL;DR: The Square-bracket operation on countable ordinals has been studied extensively in the literature, e.g. in this article, where the authors describe a general walk on a countable cardinal.
On Successors of Singular Cardinals
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the successors of singular cardinals and explain the situation for the successor of a strong limit singular cardinal λ, which can be stopped from being stationary by μ -complete forcing.
139
The tree property at successors of singular cardinals
Menachem Magidor,Saharon Shelah +1 more
TL;DR: It is shown that if $\ lambda$ is a singular limit of strongly compact cardinals, then $\lambda^+$ carries no Aronszajn trees.
80
•Posted Content
The tree property at successors of singular cardinals
Menachem Magidor,Saharon Shelah +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a model of ZFC was obtained in which aleph+1 carries no Aronszajn trees, and it was shown that if lambda is a singular limit of strongly compact cardinals, then lambda^+ carries no aronszjn trees.
57