Journal Article10.1002/1099-0771(200007/09)13:3<329::AID-BDM356>3.0.CO;2-Q
Multiple reference points in satisfaction and fairness assessment
216
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the effect of multiple reference points on ratings of salary satisfaction and fairness in a series of scenarios that described a salary offer made to a hypothetical MBA graduate and provided information about the salary offers made to either one or two other similar graduates.
read more
Abstract: Most studies of reference point effects have used a single referent, such as a price, a salary, or a target. There is considerable evidence that the judged fairness of, or satisfaction with, an outcome is significantly influenced by discrepancies from such single referents. In many settings, however, more than one reference point may be available, so the subject may be confronted simultaneously with some referents above, some at, and some below the focal outcome. Little is known about the simultaneous impact of such multiple reference points. We examine here the effects of two referents on ratings of salary satisfaction and fairness. Subjects were presented with a series of scenarios that described a salary offer made to a hypothetical MBA graduate and provided information about the salary offers made to either one or two other similar graduates. For each scenario, subjects judged how fair the focal graduate would feel the offer to be, and how satisfied he or she would be with it. Satisfaction ratings displayed asymmetric effects of comparisons: the pain associated with receiving a salary lower than another MBA is greater than the pleasure associated with a salary higher than the other student by the same amount. Fairness ratings showed a different pattern of asymmetric effects of discrepancies from the reference salaries: the focal graduate's salary was judged somewhat less fair when others received lower offers, and much less fair when others received higher offers. The asymmetric effects occurred for both reference points, suggesting that the focal salary was compared separately to each of the referents rather than to a single reference point formed by prior integration of the referents. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
The Price Is Unfair! A Conceptual Framework of Price Fairness Perceptions
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify research issues and gaps in existing knowledge on buyers' perceptions of price fairness, and conclude with guidelines for managerial practice for price fairness in the context of pricing.
1.4K
Shopper-Facing Retail Technology: A Retailer Adoption Decision Framework Incorporating Shopper Attitudes and Privacy Concerns
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a shopper-centric decision calculus that retailers can use when considering a new shopperfacing technology, which considers consumers' perceptions of fairness, value, satisfaction, trust, commitment, and attitudinal loyalty.
506
Does wage rank affect employees' well-being?
TL;DR: In this paper, the ordinal rank of an individual's wage within a comparison group was found to be correlated with quits in a workplace and with pay distribution skewness.
Dynamic Pricing and Consumer Fairness Perceptions
Kelly L. Haws,William O. Bearden +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors report the results of three studies that examine the effects of seller-, consumer-, time-, and auction-based price differences on perceived price fairness and purchase satisfaction.
415
The influence of price fairness on customer satisfaction: an empirical test in the context of automobile purchases
TL;DR: In this paper, a study was conducted in the context of automobile purchases in major German car dealerships and the authors aimed to link conceptually the concepts of price fairness and customer satisfaction and empirically demonstrate the influence of perceived price fairness on satisfaction judgments.
408
References
Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk
Daniel Kahneman,Amos Tversky +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a critique of expected utility theory as a descriptive model of decision making under risk, and develop an alternative model, called prospect theory, in which value is assigned to gains and losses rather than to final assets and in which probabilities are replaced by decision weights.
•Posted Content
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk
Daniel Kahneman,Amos Tversky +1 more
TL;DR: Prospect Theory as mentioned in this paper is an alternative theory of individual decision making under risk, developed for simple prospects with monetary outcomes and stated probabilities, in which value is given to gains and losses (i.e., changes in wealth or welfare) rather than to final assets, and probabilities are replaced by decision weights.
24.5K
•Book
Encyclopedia of Human Behavior
Vilayanur S. Ramachandran
- 31 Jan 2012
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an approach for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on the concept of cognitive disambiguation, which they call Cognitive Disparity and Cognitive Dissonance.
3.3K