Open AccessBook
Group Problem Solving
Patrick R. Laughlin
- 24 Jan 2011
102
TL;DR: Group Problem Solving is an essential resource for decision-making research in social and cognitive psychology, but also extremely relevant to multidisciplinary and multicultural problem-solving teams in organizational behavior, business administration, management, and behavioral economics as mentioned in this paper.
read more
Abstract: Experimental research by social and cognitive psychologists has established that cooperative groups solve a wide range of problems better than individuals. Cooperative problem solving groups of scientific researchers, auditors, financial analysts, air crash investigators, and forensic art experts are increasingly important in our complex and interdependent society. This comprehensive textbook--the first of its kind in decades--presents important theories and experimental research about group problem solving. The book focuses on tasks that have demonstrably correct solutions within mathematical, logical, scientific, or verbal systems, including algebra problems, analogies, vocabulary, and logical reasoning problems. The book explores basic concepts in group problem solving, social combination models, group memory, group ability and world knowledge tasks, rule induction problems, letters-to-numbers problems, evidence for positive group-to-individual transfer, and social choice theory. The conclusion proposes ten generalizations that are supported by the theory and research on group problem solving. Group Problem Solving is an essential resource for decision-making research in social and cognitive psychology, but also extremely relevant to multidisciplinary and multicultural problem-solving teams in organizational behavior, business administration, management, and behavioral economics.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Are groups more rational than individuals? A review of interactive decision making in groups
TL;DR: This article reviewed the literature of the last 25 years on decision making by groups and concluded that many real-world decisions are made by groups, it is possible to argue that standard game theory is a better descriptive model than previously believed by experimental researchers.
The cultural evolution of emergent group-level traits.
TL;DR: The emergence and evolution of group-level traits and the implications for the theory of cultural evolution are discussed, including ramifications for the evolution of human cooperation, technology, and cultural institutions, and for the equivalency of multilevel selection and inclusive fitness approaches.
The psychology of intelligence analysis: drivers of prediction accuracy in world politics.
Barbara A. Mellers,Eric Stone,Pavel Atanasov,Nick Rohrbaugh,S. Emlen Metz,Lyle H. Ungar,Michael P. Bishop,Michael Horowitz,Ed Merkle,Philip E. Tetlock +9 more
TL;DR: A profile of the best forecasters is developed; they were better at inductive reasoning, pattern detection, cognitive flexibility, and open-mindedness; they had greater understanding of geopolitics, training in probabilistic reasoning, and opportunities to succeed in cognitively enriched team environments.
Organizational Decision Making: An Information Aggregation View
Felipe A. Csaszar,J. P. Eggers +1 more
TL;DR: The authors studied four information aggregation structures commonly used by organizations to evaluate opportunities: individual decision making, delegation to experts, majority voting, and averaging of opinions, and found that delegation is the most effective structure when there is diversity of expertise, when accurate delegation is possible, and when a good fit between the firm's knowledge and the knowledge required by the environment.
156
How social information can improve estimation accuracy in human groups.
Bertrand Jayles,Hyerin Kim,Ramón Escobedo,Stéphane Cezera,Adrien Blanchet,Tatsuya Kameda,Clément Sire,Guy Theraulaz +7 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors measure and model the impact of social information at individual and collective scales and show that providing a moderate amount of incorrect information to individuals can counterbalance the human cognitive bias to systematically underestimate quantities and thereby improve collective performance.
110