1. What contributions have the authors mentioned in the paper "Estimating a three-level latent variable regression model with cross-classified multiple membership data" ?
In this paper, the authors evaluated the impact of ignoring multiple membership structures when a researcher is interested in estimating a three-level latent variable regression model.
read more
2. What future works have the authors mentioned in the paper "Estimating a three-level latent variable regression model with cross-classified multiple membership data" ?
The current simulation study only investigated the baseline conditional CCMM-LVR and HM3-LVR models, however, future simulation research should include predictors at the different levels in the models to compare parameter recovery across the two estimating models.. Researchers might be interested in other coding possibilities ( for example, final instead of initial status ) that would change the parameterization of the growth model ( see Grady & Beretvas, 2010 ).. This would be another direction for future research with the HM3-LVR model, although even more problems may be encountered with some of the parameter estimates given that the more parsimonious model evaluated in this study led to some issues with parameter recovery.. Future methodological research should investigate additional ways of handling missing identifiers in multiple membership data structures.
read more





