Journal Article10.1002/STC.301
Benchmark structural control problem for a seismically excited highway bridge—Part I: Phase I Problem definition
104
TL;DR: In this article, a 3D finite-element model is developed in MATLAB to represent the complex behavior of the full-scale highway over-crossing and the nonlinear behavior of center columns and isolation bearings is considered in formulating the bilinear force-deformation relationship.
read more
Abstract: This paper presents the problem definition of the benchmark structural control problem for the seismically excited highway bridge. The benchmark problem is based on the newly constructed 91/5 highway over-crossing in southern California. The goal of this benchmark effort is to develop a standardized model of a highway bridge using which competing control strategies, including devices, algorithms and sensors, can be evaluated comparatively. To achieve this goal, a 3D finite-element model is developed in MATLAB to represent the complex behavior of the full-scale highway over-crossing. The nonlinear behavior of center columns and isolation bearings is considered in formulating the bilinear force–deformation relationship. The effect of soil–structure interaction is considered by modeling the interaction by equivalent spring and dashpot. The ground motions are considered to be applied simultaneously in two directions. A MATLAB-based nonlinear structural analysis tool has been developed and made available for nonlinear dynamic analysis. Control devices are assumed to be installed between the deck and the end abutments of the bridge. Evaluation criteria and control constraints are specified for the design of controllers. Passive, semi-active and active devices and algorithms can be used to study the benchmark model. The participants in this benchmark study are required to define their control devices, sensors and control algorithms, evaluate and report the results of their proposed control strategies. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Experimental benchmark control problem for multi-axial real-time hybrid simulation
Johnny W. Condori Uribe,Manuel Salmeron,Edwin Patino,Herta Montoya,Shirley J. Dyke,Christian E. Silva,Amin Maghareh,Mehdi Najarian,Arturo Montoya +8 more
TL;DR: This paper proposes a multi-axial real-time hybrid simulation (maRTHS) benchmark control problem to advance RTHS methods, enabling the development and validation of control techniques for tracking translation and rotation degrees of freedom in a steel frame under seismic loads.
An SMA passive device proposed within the highway bridge benchmark
TL;DR: In this article, a shape memory alloy (SMA) device is used to limit peak bearing and displacement response quantities during strong earthquakes, but this is achieved at the cost of an increase in peak base shear and overturning moment.
Neuro-fuzzy active control optimized by Tug of war optimization method for seismically excited benchmark highway bridge
TL;DR: This study presents an active neuro-fuzzy optimized control algorithm based on a new optimization method taken from Tug of War competition, which is highly efficient for civil structures and can effectively reduce the performance indices of the structure.
References
A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics
TL;DR: In this paper, the method is capable of application to structures of any degree of complication, with any relationship between force and displacement, from linear elastic behavior through various degrees of inelastic behavior or plastic response, up to failure; any type of dynamic loading, due to shock or impact, vibration, earthquake, or nuclear blast can be considered.
5.1K
A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics
TL;DR: Method is capable of application to structures of any degree of complication, with any relationship between force and displacement, from linear elastic behavior through various degrees of inelastic behavior or plastic response, up to failure.
4.8K
Structural control: past, present, and future
George W. Housner,Lawrence A. Bergman,Thomas K. Caughey,Anastasios Chassiakos,R. O. Claus,Sami F. Masri,Robert E. Skelton,T. T. Soong,Billie F. Spencer,J. T. P. Yao +9 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide a concise point of departure for researchers and practitioners alike wishing to assess the current state of the art in the control and monitoring of civil engineering structures, and provide a link between structural control and other fields of control theory.
2.1K
Modeling and Control of Magnetorheological Dampers for Seismic Response Reduction
TL;DR: In this paper, a clipped-optimal control strategy based on acceleration feedback for controlling magnetorheological dampers is proposed to reduce structural responses due to seismic loads, and a numerical example, employing a newly developed model that accurately portrays the salient characteristics of the MR dampers, is presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the approach.