Proceedings Article10.1145/1133265.1133291
Appropriating and assessing heuristics for mobile computing
Enrico Bertini,Silvia Gabrielli,Stephen Kimani,Tiziana Catarci,Giuseppe Santucci +4 more
- 23 May 2006
- pp 119-126
TL;DR: An effort for realizing usability heuristics appropriate for mobile computing is reported, which intends to capture contextual requirements while still drawing from the inexpensive and flexible nature of heuristic-based techniques.
read more
Abstract: Mobile computing presents formidable challenges not only to the design of applications but also to each and every phase of the systems lifecycle. In particular, the HCI community is still struggling with the challenges that mobile computing poses to evaluation. Expert-based evaluation techniques are well known and they do enable a relatively quick and easy evaluation. Heuristic evaluation, in particular, has been widely applied and investigated, most likely due to its efficiency in detecting most of usability flaws at front of a rather limited investment of time and human resources in the evaluation. However, the capacity of expert-based techniques to capture contextual factors in mobile computing is a major concern. In this paper, we report an effort for realizing usability heuristics appropriate for mobile computing. The effort intends to capture contextual requirements while still drawing from the inexpensive and flexible nature of heuristic-based techniques. This work has been carried out in the context of a research project task geared toward developing a heuristic-based evaluation methodology for mobile computing. This paper describes the methodology that we adopted toward realizing mobile heuristics. It also reports a study that we carried out in order to assess the relevance of the realized mobile heuristics by comparing their performance with that of the standard/traditional usability heuristics. The study yielded positive results in terms of the number of usability flaws identified and the severity ranking assigned.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
How to develop usability heuristics
Daniela Quiones,Cristian Rusu +1 more
TL;DR: A systematic literature review of papers published between 2006 and 2016 shows that most studies use an informal process to develop usability heuristics, and a few studies apply formal methodologies to establish usabilityHeuristics.
189
A systematic mapping study of mobile application testing techniques
TL;DR: A systematic mapping study to categorize and to structure the research evidence that has been published in the area of mobile application testing techniques and challenges that they have reported and specific key testing issues for practitioners are identified.
178
Heuristic evaluation on mobile interfaces: a new checklist.
TL;DR: This paper proposes a compilation of heuristic evaluation checklists taken from the existing bibliography but readapted to new mobile interfaces, and shows the usefulness of the proposed checklist for avoiding usability gaps even with nontrained developers.
Supporting cancer patients in illness management: usability evaluation of a mobile app.
TL;DR: The usability of the Connect Mobile app was evaluated to identify existing design and functionality issues and to provide patients with a real look-and-feel of the mobile system, an online system that supports cancer patients in managing health-related issues.
135
A unified methodology for the evaluation of accessibility and usability of mobile applications
Marco Billi,Laura Burzagli,Tiziana Catarci,Giuseppe Santucci,Enrico Bertini,Francesco Gabbanini,Enrico Palchetti +6 more
TL;DR: A unified methodology developed to evaluate the accessibility and usability of mobile computing applications, which is intended to guarantee universal access as far as possible is reported.
115
References
•Book
Human-Computer Interaction
Alan Dix,Janet Finlay,Gregory D. Abowd,Russell Beale +3 more
- 01 Feb 1997
TL;DR: The human and the design of interactive systems: The myth of the infinitely fast machine, a guide to designing for diversity and the process of design.
5.3K
Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces
Jakob Nielsen,Rolf Molich +1 more
- 01 Mar 1990
TL;DR: Four experiments showed that individual evaluators were mostly quite bad at doing heuristic evaluations and that they only found between 20 and 51% of the usability problems in the interfaces they evaluated.
3.6K
•Dissertation
Providing architectural support for building context-aware applications
Anind K. Dey,Gregory D. Abowd +1 more
- 01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: This dissertation shows how the Context Toolkit has been used as a research testbed, supporting the investigation of difficult problems in context-aware computing such as the building of high-level programming abstractions, dealing with ambiguous or inaccurate context data and controlling access to personal context.
Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation
Claire-Marie Karat,Robert L. Campbell,Tarra Fiegel +2 more
- 01 Jun 1992
TL;DR: The findings were replicated across the two systems and show that the empirical testing condition identified the largest number of problems, and identified a significant number of relatively severe problems that were missed by the walkthrough conditions.
Heuristic Evaluation of Groupware Based on the Mechanics of Collaboration
Kevin Baker,Saul Greenberg,Carl Gutwin +2 more
- 11 May 2001
TL;DR: This paper describes how Nielsen's heuristic evaluation methodology, designed originally for single user applications, was adapted to help inspectors rapidly, cheaply effectively identify usability problems within groupware systems.