Steven V. Rouse
Pepperdine University
42 Papers
234 Citations
Steven V. Rouse is an academic researcher from Pepperdine University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory & Personality. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 33 publications. Previous affiliations of Steven V. Rouse include Baylor University.
Chat about Author
Papers
A reliability analysis of Mechanical Turk data
TL;DR: MTurk-based responses for a personality scale were found to be significantly less reliable than scores previously reported for a community sample, and the presence of an item asking respondents to affirm that they were attentive and honest was associated with more reliable responses.
419
Predictive and treatment validity of life satisfaction and the quality of life inventory.
Michael B. Frisch,Michelle P. Clark,Steven V. Rouse,M. David Rudd,Jennifer K. Paweleck,Andrew Greenstone,David A. Kopplin +6 more
TL;DR: The predictive validity of the QOLI and life satisfaction in a university counseling center was supported in terms of its ability to predict academic retention both by itself and in conjunction with cumulative grade point average 1 to 3 years in advance.
317
The Development and Validation of the Comprehensive Intellectual Humility Scale.
TL;DR: The analyses suggest that the 22-item Comprehensive Intellectual Humility Scale has utility as a self-report measure for future research.
278
Advances in clinical personality measurement : An item response theory analysis of the MMPI-2 PSY-5 scales
TL;DR: Item response theory (IRT) provides valuable methods for the analysis of the psychometric properties of a psychological measure as mentioned in this paper, however, these methods have not been used frequently by personality assessment researchers, due to the fact that most of the development of IRT has taken place in applied education assessment settings, resulting in terminology that is ability focused rather than trait focused.
70
The deconstruction of the Hy Scale of MMPI-2: failure of RC3 in measuring somatic symptom expression.
TL;DR: It is concluded that some RC Scales do not represent the measurement domain of the original scales and should not be relied on for or used to refine traditional interpretation, particularly in medical or forensic situations (such as personal injury cases) because of their confusing and conflicting results.
46