Seojin Bang
Carnegie Mellon University
22 Papers
22 Citations
Seojin Bang is an academic researcher from Carnegie Mellon University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Argumentation theory. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 17 publications. Previous affiliations of Seojin Bang include Seoul National University.
Chat about Author
Papers
•Posted Content
Explaining a black-box using Deep Variational Information Bottleneck Approach
TL;DR: The variational information bottleneck for interpretation, VIBI, is proposed, a system-agnostic interpretable method that provides a brief but comprehensive explanation that is both interpretability and fidelity evaluated by human and quantitative metrics.
84
ATM-TCR: TCR-Epitope Binding Affinity Prediction Using a Multi-Head Self-Attention Model
TL;DR: The model ATM-TCR is presented which uses a multi-head self-attention mechanism to capture biological contextual information and improve generalization performance and a novel application of the attention map from the model is presented to improve out-of-sample performance by demonstrating on recent SARS-CoV-2 data.
42
Classifying Argumentative Relations Using Logical Mechanisms and Argumentation Schemes
TL;DR: The authors classify argumentative relations based on four logical and theory-informed mechanisms between two statements, namely (i) factual consistency, (ii) sentiment coherence, (iii) causal relation, and (iv) normative relation.
23
Detecting Attackable Sentences in Arguments
Yohan Jo,Seojin Bang,Emaad Manzoor,Eduard Hovy,Chris Reed +4 more
- 01 Nov 2020
TL;DR: The authors presented a large-scale analysis of sentence attackability in online arguments and demonstrated that machine learning models can automatically detect attackable sentences in arguments, significantly better than several baselines and comparably well to laypeople.
•Proceedings Article
Explaining A Black-box By Using A Deep Variational Information Bottleneck Approach
Seojin Bang,Pengtao Xie,Heewook Lee,Wei Wu,Eric P. Xing +4 more
- 25 Sep 2019
TL;DR: This paper proposed the variational information bottleneck for interpretation (VIBI), a system-agnostic interpretable method that provides a brief but comprehensive explanation of a black-box decision system, which adopts an information theoretic principle, information bottleneck principle, as a criterion for finding such explanations.