Selen Cremaschi
Auburn University
107 Papers
194 Citations
Selen Cremaschi is an academic researcher from Auburn University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Multiphase flow & Stochastic programming. The author has an hindex of 14, co-authored 80 publications. Previous affiliations of Selen Cremaschi include University of Tulsa.
Chat about Author
Papers
Adaptive sequential sampling for surrogate model generation with artificial neural networks
John P. Eason,Selen Cremaschi +1 more
TL;DR: Results of the case study, optimization of carbon dioxide capture process with aqueous amines, revealed that the mixed adaptive sampling algorithm may reduce the required sample size by up to 40% compared to a purely space-filling design.
250
Process synthesis of biodiesel production plant using artificial neural networks as the surrogate models
Ismail Fahmi,Selen Cremaschi +1 more
TL;DR: A superstructure optimization model is developed to synthesize the optimum biodiesel production plant, i.e., the one that gives the minimum net present sink, which differs less than one percent from the result obtained by modeling the solution in a process simulator.
121
A perspective on process synthesis: Challenges and prospects
TL;DR: This paper is an extended version of a conference paper ( Cremaschi, 2014 ) presented at the 8th International Conference on Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design.
63
Optimization of CO2 Capture Process with Aqueous Amines—A Comparison of Two Simulation–Optimization Approaches
TL;DR: RSM results are compared to those obtained by optimizing a global surrogate model of the system over the whole decision space with a global solver, which uses an artificial neural network (ANN) as the global sur...
53
Efficient Surrogate Model Development: Impact of Sample Size and Underlying Model Dimensions
Sarah E. Davis,Selen Cremaschi,Mario R. Eden +2 more
- 01 Jan 2018
TL;DR: The comparison of surrogate-modeling construction approaches at large sample sizes revealed that surrogate modelstrained using ANN, ALAMO, and ELM yielded smaller root mean squared error and higher adjusted R-squared values than the models trained using the rest of the approaches.
52