Mick Green
Lancaster University
14 Papers
180 Citations
Mick Green is an academic researcher from Lancaster University. The author has contributed to research in topics: GLIM & Regression analysis. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 14 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
•Book
GLIM system release 4 manual
Brian Francis,Mick Green,Clive Payne +2 more
- 03 Jun 1993
TL;DR: The GLIM 4 as mentioned in this paper manual describes how GLIM can be used for statistical analysis in its most general sense, including data manipulation and display, model fitting, and prediction, and a thorough re-working of the previous GLIM manual to take account of updates to the software.
150
Developments in areal interpolation methods and GIS
Robin Flowerdew,Mick Green +1 more
TL;DR: A method is developed suitable for areal interpolation of normally distributed data and is applied to house price data for Preston, Lancashire, starting with mean house prices in 1990 for local government wards and estimatingmean house prices for postcode sectors.
135
Using areal interpolation methods in geographic information systems
Robin Flowerdew,Mick Green,Evangelos Kehris +2 more
- 01 Jul 1991
TL;DR: In this paper, the problem of comparing different data sets when they have been made available for different zonal systems has been studied, based on using additional information to guide the interpolation process.
129
Behavior of sewage sludge-derived PAHs on pasture.
TL;DR: There is the potential for persistent organic contaminants to be introduced into the grazing animal food chain if sewage sludge is applied to pasture land and the effect of sludge-pasture contact time prior to weathering by rain on the residual levels remains unclear.
65
Reducing bias in ecological studies: an evaluation of different methodologies
TL;DR: The method that is most successful at reducing ecological bias is stratified ecological regression as mentioned in this paper, which allows individual level covariate information to be incorporated into a stratified analysis, as well as the combination of disease and risk factor information from two separate data sources, e.g. outcomes from a cancer registry and risk factors from the census sample of anonymized records data set.
21