We will review some of the major results in random graphs and some of the more challenging open problems. We will cover algorithmic and structural questions. We will touch on newer models, including those related to the WWW.

Random graphs

Online mechanisms extend the methods of mechanism design to dynamic environments with multiple agents and private information. Decisions must be made as information about types is revealed online and without knowledge of the future in the sense of online algorithms. We first consider single-valued preference domains and characterize the space of decision policies that can be truthfully implemented in a dominant strategy equilibrium. Working in a model-free environment we present truthful auctions for domains with expiring items and limited-supply items. Turning to a more general preference domain, and assuming the existence of a probabilistic model for agent types, we define a dynamic Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanism that is efficient and Bayes-Nash incentive compatible. We close with some thoughts about future research directions in this area.

Algorithmic Game Theory: Quantifying the Inefficiency of Equilibria

In this paper we survey the primary research, both theoretical and applied, in the area of robust optimization (RO). Our focus is on the computational attractiveness of RO approaches, as well as the modeling power and broad applicability of the methodology. In addition to surveying prominent theoretical results of RO, we also present some recent results linking RO to adaptable models for multistage decision-making problems. Finally, we highlight applications of RO across a wide spectrum of domains, including finance, statistics, learning, and various areas of engineering.

/pdf/theory-and-applications-of-robust-optimization-3tpe0fjexc.pdf

Theory and Applications of Robust Optimization

A new era of theoretical computer science addresses fundamental problems about auctions, networks, and human behavior.

http://www.maths.lse.ac.uk/Personal/stengel/TEXTE/agt-stengel.pdf

Algorithmic Game Theory

In this paper we survey the primary research, both theoretical and applied, in the area of Robust Optimization (RO). Our focus is on the computational attractiveness of RO approaches, as well as the modeling power and broad applicability of the methodology. In addition to surveying prominent theoretical results of RO, we also present some recent results linking RO to adaptable models for multi-stage decision-making problems. Finally, we highlight applications of RO across a wide spectrum of domains, including finance, statistics, learning, and various areas of engineering.

Let $f:2^X \rightarrow \cal R_+$ be a monotone submodular set function, and let $(X,\cal I)$ be a matroid. We consider the problem ${\rm max}_{S \in \cal I} f(S)$. It is known that the greedy algorithm yields a $1/2$-approximation [M. L. Fisher, G. L. Nemhauser, and L. A. Wolsey, Math. Programming Stud., no. 8 (1978), pp. 73-87] for this problem. For certain special cases, e.g., ${\rm max}_{|S| \leq k} f(S)$, the greedy algorithm yields a $(1-1/e)$-approximation. It is known that this is optimal both in the value oracle model (where the only access to $f$ is through a black box returning $f(S)$ for a given set $S$) [G. L. Nemhauser and L. A. Wolsey, Math. Oper. Res., 3 (1978), pp. 177-188] and for explicitly posed instances assuming $P \neq NP$ [U. Feige, J. ACM, 45 (1998), pp. 634-652]. In this paper, we provide a randomized $(1-1/e)$-approximation for any monotone submodular function and an arbitrary matroid. The algorithm works in the value oracle model. Our main tools are a variant of the pipage rounding technique of Ageev and Sviridenko [J. Combin. Optim., 8 (2004), pp. 307-328], and a continuous greedy process that may be of independent interest. As a special case, our algorithm implies an optimal approximation for the submodular welfare problem in the value oracle model [J. Vondrak, Proceedings of the $38$th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2008, pp. 67-74]. As a second application, we show that the generalized assignment problem (GAP) is also a special case; although the reduction requires $|X|$ to be exponential in the original problem size, we are able to achieve a $(1-1/e-o(1))$-approximation for GAP, simplifying previously known algorithms. Additionally, the reduction enables us to obtain approximation algorithms for variants of GAP with more general constraints.

/pdf/maximizing-a-monotone-submodular-function-subject-to-a-1ag1ags3m8.pdf

Maximizing a Monotone Submodular Function Subject to a Matroid Constraint

In the Submodular Welfare Problem, m items are to be distributed among n players with utility functions wi: 2[m] → R+. The utility functions are assumed to be monotone and submodular. Assuming that player i receives a set of items Si, we wish to maximize the total utility ∑i=1n wi(Si). In this paper, we work in the value oracle model where the only access to the utility functions is through a black box returning wi(S) for a given set S. Submodular Welfare is in fact a special case of the more general problem of submodular maximization subject to a matroid constraint: max{f(S): S ∈ I}, where f is monotone submodular and I is the collection of independent sets in some matroid. For both problems, a greedy algorithm is known to yield a 1/2-approximation [21, 16]. In special cases where the matroid is uniform (I = S: |S| ≤ k) [20] or the submodular function is of a special type [4, 2], a (1-1/e)-approximation has been achieved and this is optimal for these problems in the value oracle model [22, 6, 15]. A (1-1/e)-approximation for the general Submodular Welfare Problem has been known only in a stronger demand oracle model [4], where in fact 1-1/e can be improved [9]. In this paper, we develop a randomized continuous greedy algorithm which achieves a (1-1/e)-approximation for the Submodular Welfare Problem in the value oracle model. We also show that the special case of n equal players is approximation resistant, in the sense that the optimal (1-1/e)-approximation is achieved by a uniformly random solution. Using the pipage rounding technique [1, 2], we obtain a (1-1/e)-approximation for submodular maximization subject to any matroid constraint. The continuous greedy algorithm has a potential of wider applicability, which we demonstrate on the examples of the Generalized Assignment Problem and the AdWords Assignment Problem.

https://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/files/us-jvondrak/submod-value.pdf

Optimal approximation for the submodular welfare problem in the value oracle model

Submodular maximization generalizes many important problems including Max Cut in directed and undirected graphs and hypergraphs, certain constraint satisfaction problems, and maximum facility location problems. Unlike the problem of minimizing submodular functions, the problem of maximizing submodular functions is NP-hard. In this paper, we design the first constant-factor approximation algorithms for maximizing nonnegative (non-monotone) submodular functions. In particular, we give a deterministic local-search $\frac{1}{3}$-approximation and a randomized $\frac{2}{5}$-approximation algorithm for maximizing nonnegative submodular functions. We also show that a uniformly random set gives a $\frac{1}{4}$-approximation. For symmetric submodular functions, we show that a random set gives a $\frac{1}{2}$-approximation, which can also be achieved by deterministic local search. These algorithms work in the value oracle model, where the submodular function is accessible through a black box returning $f(S)$ for a given set $S$. We show that in this model, a $(\frac{1}{2}+\epsilon)$-approximation for symmetric submodular functions would require an exponential number of queries for any fixed $\epsilon>0$. In the model where $f$ is given explicitly (as a sum of nonnegative submodular functions, each depending only on a constant number of elements), we prove NP-hardness of $(\frac{5}{6}+\epsilon)$-approximation in the symmetric case and NP-hardness of $(\frac{3}{4}+\epsilon)$-approximation in the general case.

Maximizing Non-monotone Submodular Functions

Is it possible to maximize a monotone submodular function faster than the widely used lazy greedy algorithm (also known as accelerated greedy), both in theory and practice? In this paper, we develop the first linear-time algorithm for maximizing a general monotone submodular function subject to a cardinality constraint. We show that our randomized algorithm, STOCHASTIC-GREEDY, can achieve a (1 — 1/e — e) approximation guarantee, in expectation, to the optimum solution in time linear in the size of the data and independent of the cardinality constraint. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm on submodular functions arising in data summarization, including training large-scale kernel methods, exemplar-based clustering, and sensor placement. We observe that STOCHASTIC-GREEDY practically achieves the same utility value as lazy greedy but runs much faster. More surprisingly, we observe that in many practical scenarios STOCHASTIC-GREEDY does not evaluate the whole fraction of data points even once and still achieves indistinguishable results compared to lazy greedy.

/pdf/lazier-than-lazy-greedy-19zfdytgi9.pdf

Lazier than lazy greedy

There has been much progress recently on improved approximations for problems involving submodular objective functions, and many interesting techniques have been developed. However, the resulting algorithms are often slow and impractical. In this paper we develop algorithms that match the best known approximation guarantees, but with significantly improved running times, for maximizing a monotone submodular function f: 2[n] → R+ subject to various constraints. As in previous work, we measure the number of oracle calls to the objective function which is the dominating term in the running time.Our first result is a simple algorithm that gives a (1--1/e -- e)-approximation for a cardinality constraint using O(n/e log n/e) queries, and a 1/(p + 2e + 1 + e)-approximation for the intersection of a p-system and e knapsack (linear) constraints using O (n/e2 log2n/e) queries. This is the first approximation for a p-system combined with linear constraints. (We also show that the factor of p cannot be improved for maximizing over a p-system.) The main idea behind these algorithms serves as a building block in our more sophisticated algorithms.Our main result is a new variant of the continuous greedy algorithm, which interpolates between the classical greedy algorithm and a truly continuous algorithm. We show how this algorithm can be implemented for matroid and knapsack constraints using O(n2) oracle calls to the objective function. (Previous variants and alternative techniques were known to use at least O(n4) oracle calls.) This leads to an O(n2/e4 log2n/e)-time (1--1/e -- e)-approximation for a matroid constraint. For a knapsack constraint, we develop a more involved (1--1/e -- e)-approximation algorithm that runs in time O(n2(1/e log n)poly(1/e)).

/pdf/fast-algorithms-for-maximizing-submodular-functions-4wxrn8j74m.pdf

Fast algorithms for maximizing submodular functions

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

We encountered an error while loading the panel. Please try refreshing the page.

Something went wrong

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

Anyone with the link can view this chat. You can switch it back to private anytime.

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

Jan Vondrák

Author Tools

Chat about Author