Background: Digital tourniquets used in the emergency department have been scrutinized due to complications associated with their use, including neurovascular injury secondary to excessive tourniquet pressure and digital ischemia caused by a forgotten tourniquet. To minimize these risks, a conspicuous tourniquet that applies the least amount of pressure necessary to maintain hemostasis is recommended. Objective: To evaluate the commonly used tourniquet methods, the Penrose drain, rolled glove, the Tourni-cot and the T-Ring, to determine which applies the lowest pressure while consistently preventing digital perfusion. Methods: We measured the circumference of selected digits of 200 adult males and 200 adult females to determine the adult finger size range. We then measured the pressure applied to four representative finger sizes using a pressure monitor and assessed the ability of each method to prevent digital blood flow with a pulse oximeter. Results: We selected four representative finger sizes: 45mm, 65mm, 70mm, and 85mm to test the different tourniquet methods. All methods consistently prevented digital perfusion. The highest pressure recorded for the Penrose drain was 727 mmHg, the clamped rolled glove 439, the unclamped rolled glove 267, Tourni-cot 246, while the T-Ring had the lowest at 151 mmHg and least variable pressures of all methods. Conclusion: All tested methods provided adequate hemostasis. Only the Tourni-cot and T-Ring provided hemostasis at safe pressures across all digit sizes with the T-Ring having a lower overall average pressure. [West J Emerg Med. 2011;12(2):242-249.]

/pdf/comparison-of-pressures-applied-by-digital-tourniquets-in-3o8tx4y5mt.pdf

Comparison of Pressures Applied by Digital Tourniquets in the Emergency Department - eScholarship

Hand fractures are the most common fractures of the upper extremity, with a reported incidence of 3.7 per 1000 per year for men and 1.3 per 1000 per year for women. Understanding the diagnosis and management of these injuries is vital for any clinician working in the emergency department, plastic or orthopaedic surgery or providing community care. This review identifies the most common presentations and outlines how to assess and manage such fractures appropriately, with an emphasis on clinical and radiographic examination. The majority of hand fractures are managed conservatively and operative management should be carefully considered on a case-by-case basis with analysis of patient and fracture-related factors, in order to achieve optimal hand function following treatment.

Management of hand fractures.

Nail Procedures

Validation of digital tourniquet pressures: An experimental comparison of T-RingTM and conventional surgical glove in human volunteers.

The ideal finger tourniquet must be easy to use and provide a completely bloodless field with control of the pressure exerted at the compression site. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the T-RING™ digital tourniquet in emergency hand surgery; the secondary objective was to define the optimal indications and possible contraindications. This prospective study, undertaken between May 4 and July 30, 2015, comprised the application of 100 finger tourniquets in the following indications: all single or multiple digital wounds, distal from the base of the proximal phalanx, irrespective of their nature and the suspected structural damage. Data were collected with a questionnaire at the end of each surgical use of the finger tourniquet. An overall grade out of 30 was obtained by combining these scores. The facility of opening the packing was rated on average at 4/4, the facility of applying the finger tourniquet was rated at 3.8/4, the quality of the exsanguination at the beginning and at the end of the procedure were rated at 3.4/4 and 3.1/4, respectively, the difficulty related to positioning of the finger tourniquet was rated at 2.7/3, the facility of removing the finger tourniquet was rated at 3.6/4, the risk of forgetting the finger tourniquet at the end of the procedure was rated to 2.8/3, the comparison with an arm tourniquet was rated at 1.9/4. The overall grade was 25.1/30 on average. In current practice, use of the T-Ring™ tourniquet did not cause any difficulty. The tourniquet was never forgotten and the risk of forgetting it was considered low by the surgeons. The exsanguination appeared satisfactory, with a reduction in its effectiveness over time. We identified specific situations where its use could be indispensable: contraindication to trunk or plexus regional anesthesia, or as a relay to a pneumatic arm tourniquet after more than 2hours.

A prospective study of 100 cases of sterile T–RING™ digital tourniquet application

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

We encountered an error while loading the panel. Please try refreshing the page.

Something went wrong

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

Anyone with the link can view this chat. You can switch it back to private anytime.

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

C. Wapler

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

A prospective study of 100 cases of sterile T–RING™ digital tourniquet application