About: Ziprasidone is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 1895 publications have been published within this topic receiving 81727 citations. The topic is also known as: CP-88059 & CP-88059-27.
TL;DR: Olanzapine was the most effective in terms of the rates of discontinuation, and the efficacy of the conventional antipsychotic agent perphenazine appeared similar to that of quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone.
Abstract: background The relative effectiveness of second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs as compared with that of older agents has been incompletely addressed, though newer agents are currently used far more commonly. We compared a first-generation antipsychotic, perphenazine, with several newer drugs in a double-blind study. methods A total of 1493 patients with schizophrenia were recruited at 57 U.S. sites and randomly assigned to receive olanzapine (7.5 to 30 mg per day), perphenazine (8 to 32 mg per day), quetiapine (200 to 800 mg per day), or risperidone (1.5 to 6.0 mg per day) for up to 18 months. Ziprasidone (40 to 160 mg per day) was included after its approval by the Food and Drug Administration. The primary aim was to delineate differences in the overall effectiveness of these five treatments. results Overall, 74 percent of patients discontinued the study medication before 18 months (1061 of the 1432 patients who received at least one dose): 64 percent of those assigned to olanzapine, 75 percent of those assigned to perphenazine, 82 percent of those assigned to quetiapine, 74 percent of those assigned to risperidone, and 79 percent of those assigned to ziprasidone. The time to the discontinuation of treatment for any cause was significantly longer in the olanzapine group than in the quetiapine (P<0.001) or risperidone (P=0.002) group, but not in the perphenazine (P=0.021) or ziprasidone (P=0.028) group. The times to discontinuation because of intolerable side effects were similar among the groups, but the rates differed (P=0.04); olanzapine was associated with more discontinuation for weight gain or metabolic effects, and perphenazine was associated with more discontinuation for extrapyramidal effects. conclusions The majority of patients in each group discontinued their assigned treatment owing to inefficacy or intolerable side effects or for other reasons. Olanzapine was the most effective in terms of the rates of discontinuation, and the efficacy of the conventional antipsychotic agent perphenazine appeared similar to that of quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. Olanzapine was associated with greater weight gain and increases in measures of glucose and lipid metabolism.
TL;DR: A Bayesian-framework, multiple-treatments meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to compare 15 antipsychotic drugs and placebo in the acute treatment of schizophrenia found all drugs were significantly more effective than placebo.
TL;DR: These equivalency estimates may be useful for clinical and research purposes and the source of the dose equivalency estimation is evidence-based and consistent across medication.
Abstract: Background Several clinical and research applications require an estimation of therapeutic dose equivalence across antipsychotic medications. Since the advent of the newer atypical antipsychotics, new dose equivalent estimations have been needed. Method The reported minimum effective dose was identified for each newer atypical antipsychotic medication and for haloperidol across all available fixed-dose placebo-controlled studies. Reported minimum effective dose equivalence ratios to haloperidol were then converted to chlorpromazine equivalents using the "2 mg of haloperidol equals 100 mg of chlorpromazine" convention. Data sources and study selection To identify the fixed-dose studies, the following sources were searched until June 2002: MEDLINE, the bibliographies of identified reports, published meta-analyses and reviews, Cochrane reviews, Freedom of Information Act material available from the Food and Drug Administration, and abstracts from several scientific meetings from 1997 to 2002. Results Doses equivalent to 100 mg/day of chlorpromazine were 2 mg/day for risperidone, 5 mg/day for olanzapine, 75 mg/day for quetiapine, 60 mg/day for ziprasidone, and 7.5 mg/day for aripiprazole. Conclusion These equivalency estimates may be useful for clinical and research purposes. The source of the dose equivalency estimation is evidence-based and consistent across medication.
TL;DR: Atypical antipsychotic drugs may be associated with a small increased risk for death compared with placebo, and this risk should be considered within the context of medical need for the drugs, efficacy evidence, medical comorbidity, and the efficacy and safety of alternatives.
Abstract: ContextAtypical antipsychotic medications are widely used to treat delusions,
aggression, and agitation in people with Alzheimer disease and other dementia;
however, concerns have arisen about the increased risk for cerebrovascular
adverse events, rapid cognitive decline, and mortality with their use.ObjectiveTo assess the evidence for increased mortality from atypical antipsychotic
drug treatment for people with dementia.Data SourcesMEDLINE (1966 to April 2005), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register
(2005, Issue 1), meetings presentations (1997-2004), and information from
the sponsors were searched using the terms for atypical antipsychotic drugs
(aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone), dementia, Alzheimer disease, and clinical trial.Study SelectionPublished and unpublished randomized placebo-controlled, parallel-group
clinical trials of atypical antipsychotic drugs marketed in the United States
to treat patients with Alzheimer disease or dementia were selected by consensus
of the authors.Data ExtractionTrials, baseline characteristics, outcomes, all-cause dropouts, and
deaths were extracted by one reviewer; treatment exposure was obtained or
estimated. Data were checked by a second reviewer.Data SynthesisFifteen trials (9 unpublished), generally 10 to 12 weeks in duration,
including 16 contrasts of atypical antipsychotic drugs with placebo met criteria
(aripiprazole [n = 3], olanzapine [n = 5], quetiapine
[n = 3], risperidone [n = 5]). A total of 3353 patients
were randomized to study drug and 1757 were randomized to placebo. Outcomes
were assessed using standard methods (with random- or fixed-effects models)
to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and risk differences based on patients randomized
and relative risks based on total exposure to treatment. There were no differences
in dropouts. Death occurred more often among patients randomized to drugs
(118 [3.5%] vs 40 [2.3%]. The OR by meta-analysis was 1.54; 95% confidence
interval [CI], 1.06-2.23; P = .02; and
risk difference was 0.01; 95% CI, 0.004-0.02; P = .01).
Sensitivity analyses did not show evidence for differential risks for individual
drugs, severity, sample selection, or diagnosis.ConclusionsAtypical antipsychotic drugs may be associated with a small increased
risk for death compared with placebo. This risk should be considered within
the context of medical need for the drugs, efficacy evidence, medical comorbidity,
and the efficacy and safety of alternatives. Individual patient analyses modeling
survival and causes of death are needed.
TL;DR: The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments published guidelines for the management of bipolar disorder in 2005, with updates in 2007 and 2009, and this third update, in conjunction with the International Society for Bipolar Disorders, reviews new evidence and is designed to be used in conjunctionWith the previous publications.
Abstract: The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments published guidelines for the management of bipolar disorder in 2005, with updates in 2007 and 2009. This third update, in conjunction with the International Society for Bipolar Disorders, reviews new evidence and is designed to be used in conjunction with the previous publications.The recommendations for the management of acute mania remain largely unchanged. Lithium, valproate, and several atypical antipsychotic agents continue to be first-line treatments for acute mania. Monotherapy with asenapine, paliperidone extended release (ER), and divalproex ER, as well as adjunctive asenapine, have been added as first-line options.For the management of bipolar depression, lithium, lamotrigine, and quetiapine monotherapy, as well as olanzapine plus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), and lithium or divalproex plus SSRI/bupropion remain first-line options. Lurasidone monotherapy and the combination of lurasidone or lamotrigine plus lithium or divalproex have been added as a second-line options. Ziprasidone alone or as adjunctive therapy, and adjunctive levetiracetam have been added as not-recommended options for the treatment of bipolar depression. Lithium, lamotrigine, valproate, olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, risperidone long-acting injection, and adjunctive ziprasidone continue to be first-line options for maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder. Asenapine alone or as adjunctive therapy have been added as third-line options.