TL;DR: Analysis of patients with a history of systemic allergic reactions to either honeybee or yellow jacket stings during VIT concluded that results obtained from studies on the allergy to one Hymenoptera venom cannot be extrapolated to allergies to other Hymanoptera venoms.
Abstract: Venom immunotherapy (VIT) for Hymenoptera allergy is accepted as safe and effective. However, widely varying success rates and frequencies of side effects are reported. Differences between various Hymenoptera species could account for these diverging results. We therefore analyzed 205 patients with a history of systemic allergic reactions to either honeybee (148 patients) or yellow jacket stings (57 patients) during VIT. All patients had a positive skin test to the respective venom before VIT, were monitored for side effects of VIT, and submitted to a sting challenge while they were receiving VIT. Patients with honeybee-venom allergy had a higher sensitivity in both skin tests (p less than 0.05) and RAST (p less than 0.001) than patients with yellow jacket-venom allergy. They developed systemic side effects to VIT injections significantly more often (41% versus 25%; p less than 0.01) and also reacted more frequently to the sting challenge (23% versus 9%; p less than 0.01) than patients with yellow jacket-venom allergy. We conclude that results obtained from studies on the allergy to one Hymenoptera venom cannot be extrapolated to allergies to other Hymenoptera venoms.
TL;DR: It is concluded that early in the maintenance phase of low-dose venom immunotherapy, the risk of a reaction to a challenge sting is significantly greater for those patients with low levels of venom-specific IgG antibodies.
Abstract: Parameters associated with successful venom immunotherapy in insect allergy were sought by comparison of treatment failures with successes. Half-dose treatment was completely protective in 32 patients (successes) but was only partially effective in eight (failures). The outcome of treatment was not related to the severity of pretreatment sting reactions, to the degree of skin-test sensitivity, to an atopic personal history, or to age or gender. The mean yellow jacket venom-specific IgG antibody level (by the Staph-A solid-phase radioimmunoassay) was significantly less in the failures (3.9 ± 0.6 μg/ml) than in the successes (7.3 ± 1.1 μg/ml) (p
TL;DR: Only 28% of patients with a history of Hymenoptera anaphylaxis developed anAnaphylactic reaction after an in-hospital sting challenge, and Plasma levels of PGD2 in severely reacting patients did not differ significantly from those in Patients with a mild or no reaction.
Abstract: One hundred thirty-eight patients with a previous anaphylactic reaction to a yellow jacket or a honeybee sting, as well as eight volunteers, were subjected to an in-hospital sting challenge. Plasma levels of histamine, tryptase, and prostaglandin D 2 (PGD 2 ) during sting challenge were studied in relation to clinical symptoms. Prechallenge levels (mean±SD) of histamine, tryptase, and PGD 2 were 2±1 nmol/L, 0.3±0.3 U/L, and 320±223 ng/L, respectively. In the volunteers and in none except for one of the nonreacting patients, these levels did not change significantly after challenge. In contrast, mean increases in the group of 18 patients with a mild reaction were significant for histamine and tryptase at one or more time points after the challenge. (Five patients demonstrated no increase in histamine; nine demonstrated no increase in tryptase.) Except for histamine levels in one patient, these increases were considerably more in all 17 patients with a severe reaction, starting from the first anaphylactic symptoms. Fifteen minutes later, peak values were reached of 1275±2994 nmol of histamine per liter (range, 3 to 12800 nmol/L; median, 11 nmol/L) and 406±1062 U of tryptase per liter (range, 1.8 to 4400 U/L; median, 17 U/L). This rise in levels inversely correlated with the mean arterial pressure. Plasma levels of PGD 2 in severely reacting patients did not differ significantly from those in patients with a mild or no reaction. In conclusion, only 28% of patients with a history of Hymenoptera anaphylaxis developed an anaphylactic reaction after an in-hospital challenge. The clinical severity of these reactions correlated with the level of systemically released, preformed histamine and tryptase, but not of PGD 2 .
TL;DR: The results help to clarify the commonly observed varying degrees of multiple sensitivity of people to different vespids and identify the major allergen with each vespid venom.
Abstract: White-faced hornet, yellow hornet, and yellow jacket venoms have very similar protein compositions; each contains mainly three basic proteins. Two of these proteins have hyaluronidase and phospholipase activities and the third one, designated as antigen 5, is of as yet unidentified biochemical function. These three proteins have molecular weights of about 45 000, 35 000, and 25 000, respectively. The three proteins of white-faced hornet venom have been purified to near homogeneity, while this is the case only for antigen 5 of yellow hornet and yellow jacket venoms. Strong antigenic cross-reaction of the hyaluronidase from these three vespid venoms was observed using specific rabbit anti-venom sera, while weak cross-reactions of phospholipases and of antigen 5s were observed. All three proteins are active as allergens to varying degrees in vespid sensitive individuals. With each vespid venom its antigen 5 seems to be the major allergen. The results help to clarify the commonly observed varying degrees of multiple sensitivity of people to different vespids.
TL;DR: Based on the review, mastocytosis patients have a high risk of severe sting reactions in particular to yellow jacket and VIT could be suggested, so patients should be warned that the efficacy of VIT might be less than optimal and they should continue carrying two adrenaline auto injectors.
Abstract: The most important causative factor for anaphylaxis in mastocytosis are insect stings. The purpose of this review is to analyse the available data concerning prevalence, diagnosis, safety and effectiveness of venom immunotherapy (VIT) in mastocytosis patients. If data were unclear, authors were contacted personally for further information. Quality of evidence (A: high, B: moderate, C: low and D: very low) and strength of recommendation (strong 1 and weak 2) concerning VIT in mastocytosis patients are assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation and are marked in square brackets. Results of VIT were described in 117 patients to date. The mean rate of side-effects during treatment in studies published so far is 23.9% (7.6% requiring adrenaline) with an overall protection rate of 72%. Based on the review we conclude that (1) mastocytosis patients have a high risk of severe sting reactions in particular to yellow jacket, (2) VIT could be suggested [2] in mastocytosis, (3) probably should be done life long [2], (4) VIT in mastocytosis is accompanied by a higher frequency of side-effects, so (5) special precautions should be taken into account notably during the built up phase of the therapy [2], (6) VIT is able to reduce systemic reactions, but to a lesser extent compared to the general insect venom allergic population [2], so (7) patients should be warned that the efficacy of VIT might be less than optimal and they should continue carrying two adrenaline auto injectors [2].