Abstract: 1. The Psychologies Underlying Political Psychology THEORETICAL APPROACHES 2. Models of Decision-Making 3. Childhood and Adult Political Development 4. Personality and Political Behavior 5. Evolutionary Approaches to Political Psychology 6. The Psychology of Emotion and Politics 7. Political Rhetoric INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 8. Political Psychology and Foreign Policy 9. Image Theory and Strategic Interaction in International Relations 10. Conflict Analysis and Resolution MASS POLITICAL BEHAVIOR 11. Communication and Politics in the Age of Information 12. Political Impressions: Formation and Management 13. Information Processing and Public Opinion 14. Values, Ideology, and the Structure of Political Attitudes INTERGROUP RELATIONS 15. Group Identity and Political Cohesion 16. Prejudice and Intergroup Hostility 17. Theorizing Gender in Political Psychology Research POLITICAL CHANGE 18. Education and Democratic Citizenship in a Changing World 19. Collective Political Action 20. Genocide, Mass Killing and Intractable Conflict: Roots, Evolution, Prevention, and Reconciliation EPILOGUE 21. Rescuing Political Science from Itself Index
TL;DR: This paper developed and tested a dual-process theory of political beliefs, attitudes, and behavior, claiming that all thinking, feeling, reasoning, and doing have an automatic component as well as a conscious deliberative component.
Abstract: Political behavior is the result of innumerable unnoticed forces and conscious deliberation is often a rationalization of automatically triggered feelings and thoughts. Citizens are very sensitive to environmental contextual factors such as the title 'President' preceding 'Obama' in a newspaper headline, upbeat music or patriotic symbols accompanying a campaign ad, or question wording and order in a survey, all of which have their greatest influence when citizens are unaware. This book develops and tests a dual-process theory of political beliefs, attitudes and behavior, claiming that all thinking, feeling, reasoning and doing have an automatic component as well as a conscious deliberative component. The authors are especially interested in the impact of automatic feelings on political judgments and evaluations. This research is based on laboratory experiments, which allow the testing of five basic hypotheses: hot cognition, automaticity, affect transfer, affect contagion and motivated reasoning.
TL;DR: A methodological framework for social media analytics in political context is proposed that summarizes most important politically relevant issues from the perspective of political institutions and corresponding methodologies from different scientific disciplines.
Abstract: In recent years, social media are said to have an impact on the public discourse and communication in the society. In particular, social media are increasingly used in political context. More recently, microblogging services (e.g., Twitter) and social network sites (e.g., Facebook) are believed to have the potential for increasing political participation. While Twitter is an ideal platform for users to spread not only information in general but also political opinions publicly through their networks, political institutions (e.g., politicians, political parties, political foundations, etc.) have also begun to use Facebook pages or groups for the purpose of entering into direct dialogs with citizens and encouraging more political discussions. Previous studies have shown that from the perspective of political institutions, there is an emerging need to continuously collect, monitor, analyze, summarize, and visualize politically relevant information from social media. These activities, which are subsumed under “social media analytics,” are considered difficult tasks due to a large numbers of different social media platforms as well as the large amount and complexity of information and data. Systematic tracking and analysis approaches along with appropriate scientific methods and techniques in political domain are still lacking. In this paper, we propose a methodological framework for social media analytics in political context. More specifically, our framework summarizes most important politically relevant issues from the perspective of political institutions and corresponding methodologies from different scientific disciplines.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors review advances in the study of retrospective voting, or how citizens evaluate and act on their perceptions of government performance, and discuss the circumstances under which retrospective voting achieves effective democratic accountability and when it fails to do so.
Abstract: We review advances in the study of retrospective voting, or how citizens evaluate and act on their perceptions of government performance. As a whole, the recent literature provides a more complete and nuanced picture of the retrospective voter as sometimes, but not always, effectively incentivizing elected officials to enhance public welfare. Leveraging examples of retrospective voting in areas other than the economy, the field is heading toward a middle ground in which voters resemble decision makers in many other domains. In many cases, a coherent logic governs voters' choices. In other instances, voters make mistakes, often in predictable ways subject to well-known psychological biases. Understanding the circumstances under which retrospective voting achieves effective democratic accountability and when it fails to do so is an important task for subsequent research. We discuss two additional issues for future exploration: a better understanding of normative benchmarks, and increased attention to the re...
TL;DR: In this article, the electoral relevance of welfare chauvinism and welfare populism for Dutch new-rightist populist parties was studied by means of survey data representative of the Dutch population (N = 1972).
Abstract: Next to their well-documented authoritarian cultural agenda, new-rightist populist parties have developed specific views on the welfare state: welfare chauvinism and welfare populism. This article studies the electoral relevance of these views for Dutch new-rightist populist parties by means of survey data representative of the Dutch population (N = 1972). The electorate of those parties shows high levels of both welfare chauvinism and welfare populism. However, only welfare populism underlies support for new-rightist populist parties in addition to well-known cultural motives. Based on these findings, ideological and electoral competition between political parties is discussed, and suggestions for further research are provided.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors presented cutting-edge empirical research on political trust as a relational concept and analyzed the most recent trends with regard to the development of political trust in traditional and emerging democracies in Europe.
Abstract: This book presents cutting-edge empirical research on political trust as a relational concept. From a European comparative perspective it addresses a broad range of contested issues. Can political trust be conceived as a one-dimensional concept and to what extent do international population surveys warrant the culturally equivalent measurement of political trust across European societies? Is there indeed an observable general trend of declining levels of political trust? What are the individual, societal and political prerequisites of political trust and how do they translate into trustful attitudes? Why do so many Eastern European citizens still distrust their political institutions and how does the implementation of welfare state policies both enhance and benefit from political trust? The comprehensive empirical evidence presented in this book by leading scholars provides valuable insights into the relational aspects of political trust and will certainly stimulate future research. This book features: * a state of the art European perspective on political trust; * an analysis of the most recent trends with regard to the development of political trust; * a comparison of traditional and emerging democracies in Europe; * the consequences of political trust on political stability and the welfare state; * a counterbalance of the gloomy American picture of declining political trust levels.
TL;DR: In recent years, political participation has benefited from growing attention to the study of social networks as mentioned in this paper, and most explanations for political participation have focused on characteristics of individuals, while incorporating social networks deepens our understanding of the factors that lead people to express voice in the democratic process.
Abstract: In recent years, the study of political participation has benefited from growing attention to the study of social networks. Historically, most explanations for political participation have focused on characteristics of individuals. Although these individual-level correlates do a “pretty good” job of predicting who participates, incorporating social networks deepens our understanding of the factors that lead people to express voice in the democratic process. Even though the participation literature has long been split between scholars who favor a focus on individuals and others who emphasize social networks, the two approaches need not be in tension. Instead, they complement one another. The individualistic factors known to correlate with participation—including education, religious attendance, political knowledge, political conviction, and civic duty—all have a social dimension.
TL;DR: In this paper, a multidimensional approach was adopted to the study of the impact of social media usage on political participation among young people in Hong Kong by examining how time spent on Facebook, exposure to shared political information, network size, network structural heterogeneity, and direct connection with public political actors relate to young people's online and offline political participation.
Abstract: Some recent studies have illustrated a positive relationship between social media use and political participation among young people. Researchers, however, have operationalized social media usage differently. This article adopts a multidimensional approach to the study of the impact of social media. Focusing on Facebook (FB), the most widely utilized social networking site in Hong Kong, this study examines how time spent on FB, exposure to shared political information, network size, network structural heterogeneity, and direct connection with public political actors relate to young people's online and offline political participation. Analysis of a survey of university students (N = 774) shows that participation is explained most prominently by direct connection with public political actors, followed by exposure to shared political information. These two variables also mediate the impact of other dimensions of FB use on political participation.
TL;DR: This article found that local governments whose constituents are similar politically, in terms of partisanship and voting behavior, were more likely to collaborate with one another in regional planning efforts than those whose constituents were politically diverse.
Abstract: We study the extent of political homophily—the tendency to form connections with others who are politically similar—in local governments’ decisions to participate in an important form of intergovernmental collaboration: regional planning networks. Using data from a recent survey of California planners and government officials, we develop and test hypotheses about the factors that lead local governments to collaborate within regional planning networks. We find that local governments whose constituents are similar politically, in terms of partisanship and voting behavior, are more likely to collaborate with one another in regional planning efforts than those whose constituents are politically diverse. We conclude that political homophily reduces the transaction costs associated with institutional collective action, even in settings where we expect political considerations to be minimal.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate the role of urban poor in the rise and fall of political party strategies in African democracies, and how the urban poor react to political party strategy.
Abstract: 1. Urbanization, voting behavior, and party politics in African democracies 2. Drivers of voting behavior among Africa's urban poor: why populist strategies prevail 3. The bite of 'King Cobra': populist strategies in the Zambian context 4. Gorgui's gamble: the rise and fall of populist strategies in Senegal 5. The view from below: how the urban poor react to political party strategies 6. Beyond the city: building coalitions with rural voters 7. Political parties and populist strategies in other African democracies 8. Conclusions, contributions, and implications.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used a novel experimental design and two original survey experiments to investigate how corruption affects voting behavior when economic conditions are poor and found that voters react negatively to corruption regardless of the state of the economy.
TL;DR: This paper found that issue ownership is more than merely an expression of partisanship and attitudes, and that attitudes and performance evaluations also have a substantial influence on ownership perceptions, while constituency-based ownership has a substantial, independent influence.
Abstract: Political parties’ issue ownership—their perceived competence in handling issues and problems—is a major ingredient explaining voting behavior. Yet, our understanding of the sources of issue ownership is limited. This study is the first to bring together and evaluate four different explanations of voters’ perceptions of parties’ issue ownership: partisanship, attitudes, perceived real-world developments, and constituency-based ownership. Using novel measures implemented in a national survey, we show that all four sources exert independent, if varying, influences on voters’ issue ownership perceptions. Even though voters’ partisanship tends to dominate issue ownership perceptions, attitudes and performance evaluations also matter. Moreover, the hitherto mostly neglected constituency based component of ownership has a substantial, independent influence on ownership perceptions. These findings indicate that issue ownership is more than merely an expression of partisanship and attitudes.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors created, validated, and analyzed new dynamic measures of state partisanship, state policy mood, and state political ideology, based on nearly 500 different surveys with a total of more than 740,000 respondents.
Abstract: In this article, we create, validate, and analyze new dynamic measures of state partisanship, state policy mood, and state political ideology. The measures of partisanship and policy mood begin in 1956 and the measure of ideology begins in 1976. Our approach uses the advantages of two leading techniques for measuring state public opinion—multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) and survey aggregation. The resulting estimates are based on nearly 500 different surveys with a total of more than 740,000 respondents. After validating our measures, we show that during the last half century, policy preferences in the states have shifted in important and sometimes surprising ways. For example, we find that differences in political attitudes across time can be as important as differences across states.
TL;DR: This paper showed that digital media use is positively related to political participation, however, this relationship does not appear in all studies and researchers have generally treated inconsistent media use as a predictor of political participation.
Abstract: Research shows that digital media use is positively related to political participation. However, this relationship does not appear in all studies. To date, researchers have generally treated incons...
TL;DR: The authors studied the trans-campaign effects of debates on voting behavior, image formation, and voting behavior of trans individuals in the 2008 U.S. presidential election, and found that trans individuals were more likely to vote in the debates.
Abstract: This study responds to The Racine Group's (2002) call for campaign debate research that explores “the trans-campaign effects of debates on such matters as voting behavior, image formation, and atti...
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors introduce a new measure enabling a more comprehensive assessment of swing voting, including the differentiation between clientelistic and collective goods motivations, in an environment where voters are rarely considered persuadable.
Abstract: What makes African voters “up for grabs”? Existing approaches to the swing voter have several liabilities. This article introduces a new measure enabling a more comprehensive assessment of swing voting, including the differentiation between clientelistic and collective goods motivations. The issue of swing voting is then brought to an environment where voters are rarely considered persuadable: Africa. Using a count-model estimation technique and original survey data from Ghana’s critical 2008 elections, the analysis challenges the near consensus in African politics on clientelism as the only electoral strategy. When voters perceive politicians as providing collective, developmental goods, the success of clientelism as a tool to win over voters is reduced. Many persuadable voters can also be won over by both clientelistic and collective goods thus contradicting the literature presenting these as mutually exclusive. Finally, the analysis shows that incumbents do better when they provide collective goods even in highly clientelistic environments.
TL;DR: The authors found that religious people are underrepresented among the radical right electorate, despite radical right parties' claim of being defenders of the Judeo-Christian society, and examined to what extent two dimensions of religion play a role in voting for a radical right party across seven West European countries.
Abstract: It is often found that religious people are underrepresented among the radical right electorate, despite radical right parties’ claim of being defenders of the Judeo-Christian society. This study investigates this paradoxical finding and examines to what extent two dimensions of religion – practice and belief – play a role in voting for a radical right party across seven West European countries. Using the European Values Study from 2008, it was found that religiously active people are indeed less likely to vote for a radical right party, because they tend to vote for a Christian party. However, the study challenges the common wisdom that religion alone is a restraint on radical right voting and shows that orthodox believers in three countries – Belgium, Norway and Switzerland – feel more threatened by the presence of immigrants and therefore are more likely than their mainstream counterparts to vote for a radical right party.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the influence of the Five-Factor Model of personality on ideology, partisanship, political efficacy, and two forms of political participation and found that openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and extraversion help explain public opinion and political behavior.
Abstract: In this paper, we argue that a stable set of characteristics—personality—can help explain mass political opinions and behavior. By analyzing data collected from over 750 people, we examine the influence of the Five-Factor Model of personality on ideology, partisanship, political efficacy, and two forms of political participation. After controlling for a host of demographic factors, we find that openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and extraversion help explain public opinion and political behavior. Neuroticism is the only factor that does not influence political life. We conclude by comparing these results to other findings in the field and suggest directions for future research.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors define mediatization as the growing intrusion of media logic as an institutional rule into fields where other rules of defining appropriate behavior prevailed (see Chapter 7), which can lead to an enhancement, adaptation, obstruction, or substitution of political functions by the logic of the media system.
Abstract: We define mediatization as the growing intrusion of media logic as an institutional rule into fields where other rules of defining appropriate behavior prevailed (see Chapter 7). Mediatization can lead to an enhancement, adaptation, obstruction, or even substitution of political functions by the logic of the media system. At its extreme it can lead to a state of ‘mediatized politics’ where politics ‘has lost its autonomy, has become dependent in its central functions on mass media, and is continuously shaped by interactions with mass media’ (Mazzoleni and Schulz 1999: 250). The professional, commercial, and technological production rules of the media -its operating logic — are important requirements which political actors must take into account if they are to receive publicity, public support, and legitimacy. Media logic provides an incentive structure that contextualizes, and often shapes, political processes — particularly those that are dependent on publicity and public support. From this it follows that — contrary to a priori assumptions of a fully transformed ‘media democracy’ — the concept of mediatization does not assume a complete ‘colonialization’ of politics by the media. Rather we expect that some institutions, stages, and activities in the political process will be mediatized more than others, depending on how media-compatible they are (Marcinkowski 2005).
TL;DR: This article examined the effect of general self-efficacy on young adults' voting behavior and found that general selfefficacy has a positive effect on voter turnout, and this effect is strongest for young people from low socioeconomic status families.
Abstract: Political science traditionally conceptualizes efficacy only in relation to politics and government. In this article, we look beyond political efficacy and examine the effect of general self-efficacy on young adults' voting behavior. General self-efficacy, an individual's estimation of capacity to operate successfully across a variety of domains, is often important to the behavioral decisions of individuals entering a new domain of activity. With data from the Children of the National Longitudinal Study of Youth, we examine the effect of general self-efficacy on voting behavior among young, first-time voters. We find that general self-efficacy has a positive effect on voter turnout, and this effect is strongest for young people from low socioeconomic-status families.
TL;DR: This article examined the impact of party positions and class voting in 15 Western Democracies: a Pooled Analysis, and concluded that the importance of political choice and other lessons learned Bibliography Index
Abstract: PART I: MODELS, MEASUREMENT AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 1. Explaining Cleavage Strength: The Role of Party Positions 2. Measuring Party Positions 3. Examining The Impact of Party Positions and Class Voting in 15 Western Democracies: A Pooled Analysis PART II: THE CASE STUDIES Anglo-Saxon Democracies 4. Ideological Convergence and the Decline of Class Voting in Britain 5. The United States: Still the Politics of Diversity 6. The Declining Impact of Class on the Vote in Australia: Testing Competing Explanations 7. The Class-Party Relationship in Canada, 1965- 2004 Mainland Europe 8. Enduring Divisions and New Dimensions: Class Voting in Denmark 9. The Political Evolution of Class and Religion: An Interpretation for the Netherlands 1971-2006 10. Political Change and Cleavage Voting in France: Class, Religion, Political Appeals, and Voter Alignments (1962-2007) 11. Social Divisions and Political Choices in Germany, East and West, 1980-2006 12. Class and Religious Voting in Italy: The Rise of PolicyResponsiveness Recent Democracies 13. Do Social Divisions Explain Political Choices? The Case of Poland 14. Social Class, Religiosity, and Vote Choice in Spain, 1979-2008 PART III: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS 15. The Importance of Political Choice and Other Lessons Learned Bibliography Index
TL;DR: It is confirmed that a class of nations with similar election rules fulfill the universality claim, and the role of parties in the electoral performance of candidates is crucial: alternative scalings not taking into account party affiliations lead to poor results.
Abstract: Election data represent a precious source of information to study human behavior at a large scale. In proportional elections with open lists, the number of votes received by a candidate, rescaled by the average performance of all competitors in the same party list, has the same distribution regardless of the country and the year of the election. Here we provide the first thorough assessment of this claim. We analyzed election datasets of 15 countries with proportional systems. We confirm that a class of nations with similar election rules fulfill the universality claim. Discrepancies from this trend in other countries with open-lists elections are always associated with peculiar differences in the election rules, which matter more than differences between countries and historical periods. Our analysis shows that the role of parties in the electoral performance of candidates is crucial: alternative scalings not taking into account party affiliations lead to poor results.
TL;DR: The authors investigates and analyses contemporary research regarding political participation, raising the issue pertaining to the distinction between conventional and unconventional political participation and showing why this distinction is largely artificial and to a certain extent elusive.
Abstract: This chapter investigates and analyses contemporary research regarding political participation. An extensive discussion on different conceptualizations and definitions of political participation is presented, raising the issue pertaining to the distinction between conventional and unconventional political participation and showing why this distinction is largely artificial and to a certain extent elusive. To facilitate our discussion about extreme and violent political participation activities (as they are described in contemporary research), frequent references are drawn to perceptions of the ancient Athenians as regards the roles and civil duties as citizens within their community, showing that these duties did not necessarily distinguish between different types of participation. The chapter makes further theoretical suggestions for future, pointing out the useful synergy between sociological research and political science analysis.
TL;DR: This article found evidence that the applicability of the stylized models of partisanship is conditioned on individuals' need for cognition and need for affect (NFA), with the social psychological model being most applicable to individuals who have a high NFA and the rational model more applicable to those with a high NFC.
Abstract: The voting behavior literature has advanced two prominent theoretical models of partisanship: the social psychological and rational models. Implicit to both stylized models is the assumption that all partisans process information similarly. Yet, growing research in psychology suggests that individuals possess different motivations when evaluating information. We propose that the applicability of the stylized models of partisanship is conditioned on individuals' need for cognition (NFC) and need for affect (NFA), with the social psychological model being most applicable to individuals who have a high NFA and the rational model most applicable to those with a high NFC. To test this proposition, we fielded a survey in which respondents who identified with the two major political parties in the United States (Democrat or Republican) were randomly assigned factual information that depicted either their party or their opposing party in a negative light. Respondents were then asked to assess the actions of that party and subsequently evaluate both political parties. We find evidence that is generally consistent with the proposition that the stylized models of partisanship are conditionally dependent on the extent to which individuals possess a need to engage in effortful thinking or a need to seek out emotions.
TL;DR: A multi-level, social ecological framework is built demonstrating how political violence threatens three inter-related domains of functioning: individual functioning in relationship to their environment; community functioning and social fabric; and governmental functioning and delivery of services to populations.
Abstract: Political violence is implicated in a range of mental health outcomes, including PTSD, depression, and anxiety. The social and political contexts of people's lives, however, offer considerable protection from the mental health effects of political violence. In spite of the importance of people's social and political environments for health, there is limited scholarship on how political violence compromises necessary social and political systems and inhibits individuals from participating in social and political life. Drawing on literature from multiple disciplines, including public health, anthropology, and psychology, this narrative review uses a multi-level, social ecological framework to enhance current knowledge about the ways that political violence affects health. Findings from over 50 studies were analysed and used to build a conceptual model demonstrating how political violence threatens three inter-related domains of functioning: individual functioning in relationship to their environment; community functioning and social fabric; and governmental functioning and delivery of services to populations. Results illustrate the need for multilevel frameworks that move beyond individual pathology towards more nuanced conceptualizations about how political violence affects health; findings contribute to the development of prevention programmes addressing political violence.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that it is not the changing political preferences of the working class that lead them to vote for extreme right parties, but changes in the supply side of party competition that have caused the reorientation of these voters from left-wing parties toward the extreme right.
Abstract: Although the over-representation of working-class members among the electorates of Extreme Right Parties (ERPs) in Western Europe is well documented, previous studies have usually explained this pattern as a result of this voter group's changing political preferences. In contrast to these studies, this article argues that it is not the changing political preferences of the working class that lead them to vote for ERPs, but changes in the supply side of party competition that have caused the re-orientation of these voters from left-wing parties toward the extreme right. Differentiating between an economic and a cultural dimension of party competition, it is shown that both the policy options offered by parties to voters as the salience of the two issue-dimensions have changed dramatically over the last three decades. While the salience of economic issues as well as of party system polarization among these issues have declined in most Western European countries, the very opposite trend can be identified for non-economic issues, including the core issues of ERPs (for example, immigration, and law-and-order). These changes on the supply side of party competition cause working-class voters to base their vote decisions solely on their authoritarian, non-economic preferences and not – as in the past – on their left-wing economic demands. The theoretical assumptions are tested empirically with data from the Eurobarometer Trend File for the period from 1980 to 2002. In contexts where the economic dimension is more polarized or more salient than the cultural dimension, the positive impact of being a member of the working class on the vote decision for an ERP is significantly reduced.
TL;DR: This article explored the broad set of factors that influence political efficacy among adolescents, who are at a crucial age for identity development, by analyzing interview data from 32 high school students and questionnaire responses from 142 undergraduates and found evidence to support a model that includes a wide variety of factors, such as persistence, political interest and political trust.
Abstract: Political scientists have found that one of the strongest predictors of political participation is political efficacy, the belief that individuals’ actions can influence political processes. Prior research indicates that political efficacy increases through various experiences, such as discussions of public issues, but it does not explain why or how these experiences support the development of political efficacy. To address this gap, this paper explores the broad set of factors that influence political efficacy amongst adolescents, who are at a crucial age for identity development. By analysing interview data from 32 high school students and questionnaire responses from 142 undergraduates, I found evidence to support a model that includes a wide variety of factors that contribute to political efficacy, such as persistence, political interest and political trust. Based on this empirical model, I provide practical recommendations to educators and researchers interested in preparing students for active polit...
TL;DR: This paper developed a theory of endogenous regimes transitions with a focus on democratic consolidation, which emphasizes the role of political culture and of its interaction with political institutions, focusing on two agencies of political socialization: the family and the state.
Abstract: We develop a theory of endogenous regimes transitions (with a focus on democratic consolidation), which emphasizes the role of political culture and of its interaction with political institutions. Political culture re‡ects the extent of individual commitment across citizens to defend democracy against a potential military coup, and it is an endogenous state variable of the model along with formal political institutions. We focus on two agencies of political socialization: the family and the state. Parents invest resources in order to transmit their own political values (commitment to democracy) to their children. The state invests resources in public indoctrination infrastructures. The model displays two-way
TL;DR: In this paper, a framework of leader political support is proposed, suggesting that the positive features of political leader behavior and testable propositions are developed, and its antecedents are explicated utilizing a social capital perspective.
Abstract: Historically, organizational politics and political leader behavior have been framed and characterized negatively, as self-serving and counter-productive. However, scholars have noted that political acts can achieve positive ends, and have called for further discussions of positive forms of political leadership. Continuing in this recent stream of research on positive perspectives on organizational politics, a framework of leader political support is proposed, suggesting that the positive features of leader political behavior, and testable propositions are developed. The leader political support construct is defined and its antecedents are explicated utilizing a social capital perspective. Additionally, social exchange theory is used to explain the consequences of leader political support. Contributions to both leadership and organizational politics literatures and directions for future research are discussed.