TL;DR: The hypothesis that hypertrophy develops to normalize systolic but not diastolic wall stress is suggested, and it is proposed that increased syStolic tension development by myocardial fibers results in fiber thickening just sufficient to return the systolics stress (force per unit cross-sectional area) to normal.
Abstract: It is generally recognized that chronic left ventricular (LV) pressure overload results primarily in wall thickening and concentric hypertrophy, while chronic LV volume overload is characterized by chamber enlargement and an eccentric pattern of hypertrophy. To assess the potential role of the hemodynamic factors which might account for these different patterns of hypertrophy, we measured LV wall stresses throughout the cardiac cycle in 30 patients studied at the time of cardiac catheterization. The study group consisted of 6 subjects with LV pressure overload, 18 with LV volume overload, and 6 with no evidence of heart disease (control). LV pressure, meridional wall stress (sigman), wall thickness (h), and radius (R) were measured in each patient throughout the cardiac cycle. For patients with pressure overload, LV peak systolic and end diastolic pressures were significantly increased (220 plus or minus 6/23 plus or minus 3 mm Hg) compared to control (117 plus or minus 7/10 plus or minus 1 mm Hg, P less than 0.01 for each). However, peak systolic and end diastolic (sigman) were normal (161 plus or minus 24/23 plus or minus 3 times 10-3 dyn/cm-2) compared to control (151 plus or minus 14/17 plus or minus 2 times 10-3 dyn/cm-2, NS), reflecting the fact that the pressure overload was exactly counterbalanced by increased wall thickness (1.5 plus or minus 0.1 cm for pressure overload vs. 0.8 plus or minus 0.1 cm for control, P less than 0.01). For patients with volume overload, peak systolic (sigman) was not significantly different from control, but end diastolic (sigmam) was consistently higher than normal (41 plus or minus 3 times 10-3 dyn/cm-2 for volume overload, 17 plus or minus 2 times 10-3 dyn/cm-2 for control, P less than 0.01). LV pressure overload was associated with concentric hypertrophy, and an increased value for the ratio of wall thickness to radius (h/R ratio). In contrast, LV volume overload was associated with eccentric hypertrophy, and a normal h/R ratio. These data suggest the hypothesis that hypertrophy develops to normalize systolic but not diastolic wall stress. We propose that increased systolic tension development by myocardial fibers results in fiber thickening just sufficient to return the systolic stress (force per unit cross-sectional area) to normal. In contrast, increased resting or diastolic tension appears to result in gradual fiber elongation or lengthening which improves efficiency of the ventricular chamber but cannot normalize the diastolic wall stress.
TL;DR: Correspondence of left ventricular mass in concentric remodeling appeared to reflect offsetting by volume "underload" of the effects of pressure overload, whereas eccentric hypertrophy was associated with concomitant pressure and volume overload.
TL;DR: This review will focus on the pathogenesis of pressure- versus volume-overload types of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), detection, and chronichypertrophy, which may be deleterious because it increases the risk for the development of heart failure and premature death.
Abstract: When the heart faces a hemodynamic burden, it can do the following to compensate: (1) use the Frank-Starling mechanism to increase crossbridge formation; (2) augment muscle mass to bear the extra load; and (3) recruit neurohormonal mechanisms to increase contractility. The first mechanism is limited in its scope, and the third is deleterious as a chronic adjustment. Thus, increasing mass assumes a key role in the compensation for hemodynamic overload. This increase in mass is due to the hypertrophy of existing myocytes rather than hyperplasia, because cardiomyocytes become terminally differentiated soon after birth. In response to pressure overload in conditions such as aortic stenosis or hypertension, the parallel addition of sarcomeres causes an increase in myocyte width, which in turn increases wall thickness. This remodeling results in concentric hypertrophy (increase in ratio of wall thickness/chamber dimension).
According to LaPlace’s Law, the load on any region of the myocardium is given as follows: (pressure×radius)/(2×wall thickness); thus, an increase in pressure can be offset by an increase in wall thickness. Because systolic stress (afterload) is a major determinant of ejection performance, the normalization of systolic stress helps maintain a normal ejection fraction even when needing to generate high levels of systolic pressure.1 Volume overload in conditions such as chronic aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation, or anemia engenders myocyte lengthening by sarcomere replication in series and an increase in ventricular volume. This pattern of eccentric hypertrophy (cavity dilatation with a decrease in ratio of wall thickness/chamber dimension) is also initially compensatory, such that the heart can meet the demand to sustain a high stroke volume. However, chronic hypertrophy may be deleterious because it increases the risk for the development of heart failure and premature death.
This review will focus on the pathogenesis of pressure- versus volume-overload types of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), detection, …
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss potential novel therapies for these disorders, including: sildenafil, an unexpected option for anti-transition therapy; surgery for increased sphericity caused by chronic volume overload of mitral regurgitation; an antifibrotic peptide to inhibit the fibrogenic effects of transforming growth factor β; mechanical intervention in advanced heart failure; and stem-cell therapy.
TL;DR: In the setting of either pressure overload or volume overload, the right ventricular mechanics and function are altered and the RV chamber becomes more spherical and tricuspid regurgitation is aggravated, a cascade leading to increasing venous congestion as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Acute right ventricular (RV) failure is a complex clinical syndrome that results from many causes. Research efforts have disproportionately focused on the failing left ventricle, but recently the need has been recognized to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of RV anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology, and of management approaches. Right ventricular mechanics and function are altered in the setting of either pressure overload or volume overload. Failure may also result from a primary reduction of myocardial contractility owing to ischaemia, cardiomyopathy, or arrhythmia. Dysfunction leads to impaired RV filling and increased right atrial pressures. As dysfunction progresses to overt RV failure, the RV chamber becomes more spherical and tricuspid regurgitation is aggravated, a cascade leading to increasing venous congestion. Ventricular interdependence results in impaired left ventricular filling, a decrease in left ventricular stroke volume, and ultimately low cardiac output and cardiogenic shock. Identification and treatment of the underlying cause of RV failure, such as acute pulmonary embolism, acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute decompensation of chronic pulmonary hypertension, RV infarction, or arrhythmia, is the primary management strategy. Judicious fluid management, use of inotropes and vasopressors, assist devices, and a strategy focusing on RV protection for mechanical ventilation if required all play a role in the clinical care of these patients. Future research should aim to address the remaining areas of uncertainty which result from the complexity of RV haemodynamics and lack of conclusive evidence regarding RV-specific treatment approaches.