TL;DR: A two-year experience with an endoscopic method using a unique valved prosthesis eliminating complicated surgical reconstructions, aspiration, and stenosis is reported, and ninety-four of 60 patients achieved fluent voices with one deglutition problem.
Abstract: Reports of restoration of voice after total laryngectomy include diversion of exhaled pulmonary air though planned or spontaneous fistulae with a variety of modified tracheal cannulas and valves. Limitations of these techniques include aspiration, scar closure of the shunts, wound complications, and failure to achieve voice consistently. We report a two-year experience with an endoscopic method using a unique valved prosthesis eliminating complicated surgical reconstructions, aspiration, and stenosis. Fifty-four of 60 patients (90%) achieved fluent voices with one deglutition problem. Radiation therapy preceded voice restoration in 63% of the patients and radical neck dissection in 72%. The endoscopic procedure, hospitalization and period of speech therapy are short and constitute a cost-effective voice rehabilitation program. The results of this simple method and lack of complications are encouraging.
TL;DR: Voice quality, hyposmia and dysgeusia, nasal discharge, swallowing and smoking habits were studied by means of a structured interview with 63 laryngectomized patients and significant correlations were found between the quality of the voice and fatigue, frequency of making telephone calls and anxiety about speaking.
Abstract: Functional changes after total laryngectomy, including voice quality, hyposmia and dysgeusia, nasal discharge, swallowing and smoking habits were studied by means of a structured interview with 63 laryngectomized patients. Eighty per cent of the patients reported that they were satisfied with the quality of their voice including speaking on the telephone. Significant correlations were found between the quality of the voice and fatigue, frequency of making telephone calls and anxiety about speaking (P < 0.01). Vocal rehabilitation was achieved in the majority of patients (78%) with the indwelling Provox voice prosthesis. Forty-five per cent of the patients complained about annoying eructation. Hyposmia was reported by 52% of the patients, while 15% experienced dysgeusia. A significant correlation was found between hyposmia and dysgeusia (R = 0.43, P < 0.001). All patients with a taste problem also reported a poor sense of smell. Daily nasal discharge was reported by 38% of the patients. Due to difficulties in swallowing solid food, about one quarter of the patients changed their diet. All but one patient had been heavy smokers pre-operatively. Only 9% continued to smoke post-operatively. These results, along with the previously reported respiratory problems resulting from total laryngectomy, should be taken into account in counselling patients who are candidates for this surgical procedure.
TL;DR: A multi-institution prospective study design demonstrated that at six months following laryngectomy only 12 (26%) of their 47 patients used esophageal speech, and at one year, 39 patients continued to use their voice prosthesis.
Abstract: Gates et al suggested that commonly accepted statistics on esophageal speech acquisition may be inflated because they are compiled from retrospective observations that tend to exclude high-risk or poor-outcome patients who are unavailable or unwilling to be assessed. Using a multi-institution prospective study design, they demonstrated that at six months following laryngectomy only 12 (26%) of their 47 patients used esophageal speech. We prospectively assessed a group of 47 laryngectomees' pretracheoesophageal puncture and posttracheoesophageal puncture to determine the efficacy of this speech-rehabilitation method. Forty-four patients (94%) achieved good to superior tracheoesophageal speech, and, at one year, 39 patients (83%) continued to use their voice prosthesis. Results of this study reveal (1) preoperative speech intelligibility and acceptability, (2) predictive value of the preoperative esophageal insufflation test, (3) speech intelligibility and acceptability four days following initial voice prosthesis placement, (4) cost profiles, and (5) results and experiences at one year.
TL;DR: A low-resistance indwelling prosthesis for vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy, Provox was developed in the Netherlands Cancer Institute 5 years ago and good to fair vocal rehabilitation was achieved in 92% of the patients.
Abstract: A low-resistance indwelling prosthesis for vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy, ProvoxTM was developed in the Netherlands Cancer Institute 5 years ago. The long-term results in 132 patients using this prosthesis are now reported. The mean and median device life of the prosthesis in the 75 patients in long-term follow-up are 235 and 141 days respectively. Good to fair vocal rehabilitation was achieved in 92% of the patients. Statistical analysis revealed a significant relationship of the device life with the original tumour site (P=0.0078).
Radiotherapy had a borderline (P=0.0652) negative influence on the device life but not on prosthesis-related complications. Increasing follow-up time has a positive influence on the device life of the prosthesis (P < 0.0001).
TL;DR: One hundred ProvoxTM voice prostheses consecutively inserted in 37 patients and replaced only when phonation was impaired or complications noted were analyzed for in situ lifetime, causes for replacement, and complications.
Abstract: One hundred ProvoxTM voice prostheses consecutively inserted in 37 patients and replaced only when phonation was impaired or complications noted were analyzed for in situ lifetime, causes for replacement, and complications. The mean in situ lifetime was 311 days. Actuarial analysis(Kaplan-Meier method) of the in situ lifetime revealed that 65.9%, 23.7%, and 16.4% of the voice prosthesis were still in situ by the 6th, 12th, and 18th postinsertion month. Cause for replacement was salivary leakage through the prosthesis valve, salivary leakage around the prosthesis, deterioration of the prosthesis, and excessive crusting resulting in increased airflow resistance in 33%, 27%, 24%, and 16% of cases, respectively. Complications included granulation tissue formation, cervical cellulitis, necrosis of the tracheoesophageal puncture, tracheostomal stenosis, and swallowing impairment in six, two, one, three, and one patient, respectively.