Unsatisfiable core

Abstract: Much research in the area of constraint processing has recently been focused on extracting small unsatisfiable "cores" from unsatisfiable constraint systems with the goal of finding minimal unsatisfiable subsets (MUSes). While most techniques have provided ways to find an approximation of an MUS (not necessarily minimal), we have developed a sound and complete algorithm for producing all MUSes of an unsatisfiable constraint system. In this paper, we describe a relationship between satisfiable and unsatisfiable subsets of constraints that we subsequently use as the foundation for MUS extraction algorithms, implemented for Boolean satisfiability constraints. The algorithms provide a framework with which many related subproblems can be solved, including relaxations of completeness to handle intractable instances, and we develop several variations of the basic algorithms to illustrate this. Experimental results demonstrate the performance of our algorithms, showing how the base algorithms run quickly on many instances, while the variations are valuable for producing results on instances whose complete results are intractably large. Furthermore, our algorithms are shown to perform better than the existing algorithms for solving either of the two distinct phases of our approach.

Abstract: A method of automatic abstraction is presented that uses proofs of unsatisfiability derived from SAT-based bounded model checking as a guide to choosing an abstraction for unbounded model checking. Unlike earlier methods, this approach is not based on analysis of abstract counterexamples. The performance of this approach on benchmarks derived from microprocessor verification indicates that SAT solvers are quite effective in eliminating logic that is not relevant to a given property. Moreover, benchmark results suggest that when bounded model checking successfully terminates, and the problem is unsatisfiable, the number of state variables in the proof of unsatisfiability tends to be small. In almost all cases tested, when bounded model checking succeeded, unbounded model checking of the resulting abstraction also succeeded.

Abstract: As SAT-algorithms become more and more complex, there is little chance of writing a SAT-solver that is free of bugs. So it is of great importance to be able to verify, the information returned by a SAT-solver. If the CNF formula to be tested is satisfiable, solution verification is trivial and can be easily done by the user. However, in the case of unsatisfiability, the user has to rely on the reputation of the SAT-solver. We describe an efficient procedure for checking the correctness of unsatisfiability proofs. As a by-product, the proposed procedure finds an unsatisfiable core of the initial CNF formula. The efficiency of the proposed procedure was tested on a representative set of large "real-life" CNF formulas from the formal verification domain.

Abstract: This paper describes a new algorithm for extracting unsatisfiable subformulas from a given unsatisfiable CNF formula. Such unsatisfiable "cores" can be very helpful in diagnosing the causes of infeasibility in large systems. Our algorithm is unique in that it adapts the "learning process" of a modern SAT solver to identify unsatisfiable subformulas rather than search for satisfying assignments. Compared to existing approaches, this method can be viewed as a bottom-up core extraction procedure which can be very competitive when the core sizes are much smaller than the original formula size. Repeated runs of the algorithm with different branching orders yield different cores. We present experimental results on a suite of large automotive benchmarks showing the performance of the algorithm and highlighting its ability to locate not just one but several cores.