TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce a formal model of two-sided network externalities based in textbook economics, a mix of Katz and Shapiro network effects, price discrimination, and product differentiation.
Abstract: How can firms profitably give away free products? This paper provides a novel answer and articulates trade-offs in a space of information product design. We introduce a formal model of two-sided network externalities based in textbook economics-a mix of Katz and Shapiro network effects, price discrimination, and product differentiation. Externality-based complements, however, exploit a different mechanism than either tying or lock-in even as they help to explain many recent strategies such as those of firms selling operating systems, Internet browsers, games, music, and video.
The model presented here argues for three simple but useful results. First, even in the absence of competition, a firm can rationally invest in a product it intends to give away into perpetuity. Second, we identify distinct markets for content providers and end consumers and show that either can be a candidate for a free good. Third, product coupling across markets can increase consumer welfare even as it increases firm profits.
The model also generates testable hypotheses on the size and direction of network effects while offering insights to regulators seeking to apply antitrust law to network markets.
TL;DR: A formal model of two-sided network externalities based in textbook economics-a mix of Katz and Shapiro network effects, price discrimination, and product differentiation is introduced, offering insights to regulators seeking to apply antitrust law to network markets.
Abstract: How can firms profitably give away free products? This paper provides a novel answer and articulates tradeoffs in a space of information product design. We introduce a formal model of two-sided network externalities based in textbook economics - a mix of Katz & Shapiro network effects, price discrimination, and product differentiation. Externality-based complements, however, exploit a different mechanism than either tying or lock-in even as they help to explain many recent strategies such as those of firms selling operating systems, Internet browsers, games, music, and video.The model presented here argues for three simple but useful results. First, even in the absence of competition, a firm can rationally invest in a product it intends to give away into perpetuity. Second, we identify distinct markets for content providers and end consumers and show that either can be a candidate for a free good. Third, product coupling across markets can increase consumer welfare even as it increases firm profits.The model also generates testable hypotheses on the size and direction of network effects while offering insights to regulators seeking to apply antitrust law to network markets.
TL;DR: The authors distinguishes between two types of costly signals that state leaders might employ in trying to credibly communicate their foreign policy interests to other states, whether in the realm of foreign policy or not.
Abstract: The author distinguishes between two types of costly signals that state leaders might employ in trying to credibly communicate their foreign policy interests to other states, whether in the realm o...
TL;DR: In this article, it is argued that EMS membership brings potentially large credibility gains for policy-makers in inflation-prone countries, since not only it attaches an extra penalty to inflation (in terms of real appreciation), but makes the public aware that the policymaker is faced with such penalty, and thus helps to overcome the inefficiency stemming from the public's mistrust of the authorities.
TL;DR: The authors investigates empirically whether top corporate executives are compensated as if their performance is evaluated relative to the performance of competitors, and they find that tying executive pay to firm performance helps align the goal of executives with the goals of the firm's owners.
Abstract: This paper investigates empirically whether top corporate executives are compensated as if their performance is evaluated relative to the performance of competitors.1 This research extends previous investigations into the structural relation between executive compensation and absolute measures of firm performance.2 The premise of these investigations was that tying executive pay to firm performance helps align the goals of executives with the goals of the firm's owners. The efficiency