About: Two-point discrimination is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 163 publications have been published within this topic receiving 4974 citations.
TL;DR: Preliminary data indicate that body image is disrupted, and tactile acuity is decreased, in the area of usual pain, in patients with chronic back pain, and this finding raises the possibility that training body image or Tactile acuity may help patients in chronic spinal pain.
Abstract: The conscious sense of our body, or body image, is often taken for granted, but it is disrupted in many clinical states including complex regional pain syndrome and phantom limb pain. Is the same true for chronic back pain? Body image was assessed, via participant drawings, in six patients with chronic back pain and ten healthy controls. Tactile threshold and two-point discrimination threshold (TPD) were assessed in detail. All the patients, and none of the controls, showed disrupted body image of the back. Five patients were unable to clearly delineate the outline of their trunk and stated that they could not "find it". TPD was greatly increased in the same zone as the absence or disruption of body image, but was otherwise similar to controls. The disturbance of body image and decrease in tactile acuity coincided with the normal distribution of pain, although there was no allodynia and there was no relationship between resting pain level and TPD. Tactile threshold was unremarkable for patients and controls. These preliminary data indicate that body image is disrupted, and tactile acuity is decreased, in the area of usual pain, in patients with chronic back pain. This finding raises the possibility that training body image or tactile acuity may help patients in chronic spinal pain, as it has been shown to do in patients with complex regional pain syndrome or phantom limb pain.
TL;DR: This work provides the first systematic whole‐body mapping of spatial acuity for pain in the body, more than a century after the initial description of tactile acuity across the body.
TL;DR: The measurements for two-point discrimination obtained with the protocol employed in this study were found to have an interobserver reliability at the p less than 0.00001 level.
Abstract: Both moving and static two-point discrimination are valid measurements of functional sensibility in the hand. The present study investigated the interobserver variability of these measurements when two observers used the same testing instrument and the same definition of the testing procedure's end point. In testing 30 nerve-injured patients, interobserver variability was found to vary within 1 mm, or less, for moving two-point discrimination in 93.3% of the measurements and for static two-point discrimination in 86.8% of the measurements. In only two of the 30 measurements of moving two-point discrimination and in four of the measurements for static two-point discrimination were interobserver differences equal to 2 mm. Measurements for both moving and static two-point discrimination were analyzed statistically by linear regression and correlation co-efficient techniques. The measurements for two-point discrimination obtained with the protocol employed in this study were found to have an interobserver reliability at the p less than 0.00001 level.
TL;DR: The main finding was that aging is much harder on some body regions than on others, and the hands and feet turned out to be far more vulnerable than the more central regions, including the very acute lip and tongue.
Abstract: Spatial acuity over 13 regions of the body was assessed cross-sectionally in 122 male and female subjects between 8 and 87 years of age. Of two measures, the primary one was a threshold for detecting a gap between two points (a refinement of the conventional two-point threshold). The secondary one was a threshold of point localization in 7 of these 13 body regions. The two measures yielded similar pictures of body acuity and age-related changes in acuity, and they agreed in essentials with an early acuity map dating back to Weber in 1835, as cited and confirmed experimentally by Weinstein (1968). To this acuity map, the present study added the dimension of age. The main finding was that aging is much harder on some body regions than on others. Declining acuity with age was found to characterize all regions to one degree or another, but the hands and feet turned out to be far more vulnerable than the more central regions, including the very acute lip and tongue. Deterioration of acuity in the great toe (averaging 400% between youth and advanced age) and fingertip (averaging 130%) may adversely affect such diverse activities as braille reading, grasping, and maintaining balance. The acuity map determined by gap discrimination was essentially the same for males and females; however, males gave significantly smaller localization thresholds than females. In two body regions tested (fingertip and upper lip), children significantly outperformed young adults at gap discrimination.
TL;DR: In assessing the prospects for surgical and other kinds of rehabilitation in tetraplegia and stroke patients the two-point discrimination test, correctly performed by experienced examiners, is of great value.
Abstract: In assessing the prospects for surgical and other kinds of rehabilitation in tetraplegia and stroke patients the two-point discrimination test, correctly performed by experienced examiners, is of great value. Valid and repeatable results depend on exact technique and proper tools. There is a firm correlation between the thresholds of two-point discrimination on the pulps of the fingers and the accuracy of position sense at the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints. Microneurography has shown that cutaneous receptors have proprioceptive as well as exteroceptive functions. Thus the two-point discrimination test can be used as a measure of proprioceptive function. The results can be expressed numerically. A two-point threshold less than 10 mm on the pulp is a valid measure of useful finger proprioception. It also shows tactile gnosis, necessary for precision sensory grips.