About: Tridiagonal matrix algorithm is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 1070 publications have been published within this topic receiving 21084 citations.
TL;DR: This paper locates and explains the different reasons the recursive algorithms for inverting tridiagonal matrices fail to deliver satisfactory result, and proposes new formulae for the elements of X that allow to construct the asymptotically fastest possible algorithm for computing the inverse of an arbitrary tridiagon matrix.
Abstract: If $A$ is a tridiagonal matrix, then the equations $AX=I$ and $XA=I$ defining the inverse $X$ of $A$ are in fact the second order recurrence relations for the elements in each row and column of $X$. Thus, the recursive algorithms should be a natural and commonly used way for inverting tridiagonal matrices -- but they are not. Even though a variety of such algorithms were proposed so far, none of them can be applied to numerically invert an arbitrary tridiagonal matrix. Moreover, some of the methods suffer a huge instability problem. In this paper, we investigate these problems very thoroughly. We locate and explain the different reasons the recursive algorithms for inverting such matrices fail to deliver satisfactory (or any) result, and then propose new formulae for the elements of $X=A^{-1}$ that allow to construct the asymptotically fastest possible algorithm for computing the inverse of an arbitrary tridiagonal matrix $A$, for which both residual errors, $\|AX-I\|$ and $\|XA-I\|$, are always very small.
TL;DR: Some special classes of tridiagonal matrices A are considered, and the complexity of solving a linear system Ax=f is investigated, when rational preconditioning on A is allowed, and in all cases the number of necessary multiplicative operations, apart from preconditionsing, is shown to be greater than thenumber of indeterminates defining A.
Abstract: Some special classes of tridiagonal matrices A are considered, and the complexity of solving a linear system Ax=f is investigated, when rational preconditioning on A is allowed. Non-trivial lower bounds are found, and in all cases the number of necessary multiplicative operations, apart from preconditioning, is shown to be greater than the number of indeterminates defining A.
TL;DR: Based on Luo’s parallel algorithm for certain Toeplitz cyclic tridiagonal systems on distributed-memory multicomputer, an improved algorithm is presented that is simple and redundant computing is small for solving massively systems.
Abstract: Based on Luo’s parallel algorithm [4] for certain Toeplitz cyclic tridiagonal systems on distributed-memory multicomputer, we present an improved algorithm. Its communication mechanism is simple and redundant computing is small for solving massively systems. The numerical experiments show that the parallel efficiency of the improved algorithm is higher than Luo’s algorithm [4].
TL;DR: The effect of this matrix approximation is studied and a rigorous error analysis is given and the numerical results are presented.
Abstract: The Parallel Diagonal Dominant (PDD) Algorithm has been proposed for solving certain types of tridiagonal linear systems. The algorithm employ a matrix approximation. Both theoretical and experimental results have shown that the PDD algorithm is a highly efiient parallel algorithm for a variety of architectures. In this paper, the effect of this approximation is studied and a rigorous error analysis is given. The numerical results are presented.