About: Transfer (computing) is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 4365 publications have been published within this topic receiving 35187 citations. The topic is also known as: GT/s & data transfer.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors formulate semi-direct MP2 methods that utilize disk space (which is usually much larger than memory size) for the steps that require most storage, and show that these methods are superior to conventional algorithms despite requiring less disk space.
TL;DR: Big Transfer (BiT) as discussed by the authors uses pre-trained representations to improve sample efficiency and simplifies hyperparameter tuning when training deep neural networks for vision, achieving state-of-the-art performance on 20 datasets.
Abstract: Transfer of pre-trained representations improves sample efficiency and simplifies hyperparameter tuning when training deep neural networks for vision. We revisit the paradigm of pre-training on large supervised datasets and fine-tuning the model on a target task. We scale up pre-training, and propose a simple recipe that we call Big Transfer (BiT). By combining a few carefully selected components, and transferring using a simple heuristic, we achieve strong performance on over 20 datasets. BiT performs well across a surprisingly wide range of data regimes—from 1 example per class to 1M total examples. BiT achieves 87.5% top-1 accuracy on ILSVRC-2012, 99.4% on CIFAR-10, and 76.3% on the 19 task Visual Task Adaptation Benchmark (VTAB). On small datasets, BiT attains 76.8% on ILSVRC-2012 with 10 examples per class, and 97.0% on CIFAR-10 with 10 examples per class. We conduct detailed analysis of the main components that lead to high transfer performance.
TL;DR: By combining a few carefully selected components, and transferring using a simple heuristic, Big Transfer achieves strong performance on over 20 datasets and performs well across a surprisingly wide range of data regimes -- from 1 example per class to 1M total examples.
Abstract: Transfer of pre-trained representations improves sample efficiency and simplifies hyperparameter tuning when training deep neural networks for vision. We revisit the paradigm of pre-training on large supervised datasets and fine-tuning the model on a target task. We scale up pre-training, and propose a simple recipe that we call Big Transfer (BiT). By combining a few carefully selected components, and transferring using a simple heuristic, we achieve strong performance on over 20 datasets. BiT performs well across a surprisingly wide range of data regimes -- from 1 example per class to 1M total examples. BiT achieves 87.5% top-1 accuracy on ILSVRC-2012, 99.4% on CIFAR-10, and 76.3% on the 19 task Visual Task Adaptation Benchmark (VTAB). On small datasets, BiT attains 76.8% on ILSVRC-2012 with 10 examples per class, and 97.0% on CIFAR-10 with 10 examples per class. We conduct detailed analysis of the main components that lead to high transfer performance.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a data network with a remote data facility for providing redundant data storage and for enabling concurrent point-in-time backup operations, where the second system is enabled to transfer data from its data facility to a backup facility concurrently with, but independently of, the operation of the first system.
Abstract: A data network with a remote data facility for providing redundant data storage and for enabling concurrent point-in-time backup operations. A local data processing system with a data facility stores a data base and processes applications. A second system, physically separated from the first system, includes a data facility that normally mirrors the data in the first system. In a backup mode, the second system is enabled to transfer data from its data facility to a backup facility concurrently with, but independently of, the operation of the first system. On completion of the backup operation, the second system reconnects with and synchronizes with the first system thereby to reestablish the mirroring operation of the second system.
TL;DR: In this paper, a control protocol is proposed to coordinate an asymmetric response between the first and second server systems to a first data transfer request, such that file transferred by the client with the first data-transfer request is replicated to the first-and second-storing mediums, and such that the file transferred to the client system in response to the request is non-replicatively provided by either the first or second server system.
Abstract: A network computer system providing for the fault tolerant storage and retrieval of data files includes a client system connected to a data communication network that may source a first data transfer request to said data communication network for the transfer or retrieval of data. A first server system, including first medium for storing data files, is connected to the data communication network so as to be responsive to first data transfer requests. A second server system, including second medium for storing data files is also connected to said data communication network to also be responsive to first data transfer requests. A control protocol, established between the first and second server systems, coordinates an asymmetric response by the first and second server systems to a first data transfer request, such that file data transferred by the client with the first data transfer request is replicated to the first and second storing mediums and such that file data transferred to the client system in response to the first data transfer is non-replicatively provided to the client system by either the first or second server system.