Traction splint

Abstract: A review of all flexor tendon repairs in the "no man's land" performed from January of 1985 to June of 1987 was done to evaluate the efficacy of our method of rehabilitation. There were 60 fingers (57 patients) with complete laceration of the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis tendons in zone II. Fingers with phalangeal fractures, joint injuries, or significant skin loss were excluded. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 48 months. Rehabilitation consisted of a 12-week protocol using the U.S. military combined regimen of controlled motion. Features from the technique of controlled active extension against rubber band passive flexion as well as those of controlled passive extension and passive flexion were incorporated. The palmar pulley modification of Kleinert's dynamic traction splint was utilized. Strickland's total active motion formula was employed to determine results. The results were classified into the four categories of excellent, good, fair, and poor. Fifty-two fingers (86 percent) were rated excellent, 4 fingers (7 percent) were rated good, 1 finger (2 percent) was rated fair, and 3 fingers (5 percent) were rated poor.

Abstract: The present study was completed to establish an epidemiologic database defining the prehospital occurrence of midthigh trauma/suspected femoral shaft fractures, and the use of/need for traction splints (TS) in hope of developing recommendations for further treatment protocols. On review of 4,513 paramedic run reports for the 12-month period from January 1999 through December 1999, from a low-volume urban emergency medical services (EMS) system, 16 persons (0.35% total patients) presented with midthigh injuries. Data collected included patient chief complaint/injury, mechanism of injury, clinical findings, splint application, additional interventions, iatrogenic complications, patient age, and ambulance field time. Paramedics noted injuries suspicious for femoral shaft fractures in 5 patients (31.25% study patients, 0.11% total patients). TSs were applied successfully only twice (12.50% study patients, 0.04% total patients). Fourteen patients (87.50% study patients) were managed with long backboard immobilization, rigid splinting, and/or patient transportation in a position of comfort. No sequelae as a result of such care occurred. No inappropriate use, point estimate (PE) [(0)/(16) (0.00% to 20.60%)] or unmet need, PE [(0)/(4), 497) (0.00% to 0.08%)] of care was noted. The data presented in this study suggest that given similar EMS system characteristics, prehospital midthigh injuries/suspected femoral shaft fractures occur on an extremely rare basis, and treatment with long backboard immobilization, rigid splinting, and/or patient transportation in a position of comfort may constitute an acceptable course of care. Including TSs as essential ambulance equipment may be unnecessary.

Abstract: Devices and methods are disclosed for achieving control and stabilization of bone fractures in mammals, most specifically humans. Stabilization and traction is often required to support fractured bones of the arms or legs. The devices and methods disclosed herein are especially useful in the emergency or military setting. The devices utilize a collapsible frame or inflatable member that may be expanded and locked into position. The frame or inflatable member is fabricated primarily from polymeric materials with low radiodensity. The limb contact regions are adjustable to fit a wide variety of limb sizes and fracture locations. The traction applied by the splint is adjustable, controllable and measurable. The traction splint is sufficiently compact that it will fit in a compartment of most ambulances and emergency rescue vehicles, thus making it more available for use than standard traction splints in use today. The traction splint is either a separate device or integrated into a backboard.