TL;DR: This personal historical article traces the development of the Big-Five factor structure, whose growing acceptance by personality researchers has profoundly influenced the scientific study of individual differences.
Abstract: This personal historical article traces the development of the Big-Five factor structure, whose growing acceptance by personality researchers has profoundly influenced the scientific study of individual differences. The roots of this taxonomy lie in the lexical hypothesis and the insights of Sir Francis Galton, the prescience of L. L. Thurstone, the legacy of Raymond B. Cattell, and the seminal analyses of Tupes and Christal. Paradoxically, the present popularity of this model owes much to its many critics, each of whom tried to replace it, but failed. In reaction, there have been a number of attempts to assimilate other models into the five-factor structure. Lately, some practical implications of the emerging consensus can be seen in such contexts as personnel selection and classification.
TL;DR: The first large experimental inquiry carried out by the methods of factor analysis described by Thurstone in The Vectors of the Mind as discussed by the authors was made possible by financial grants from the Social Science Research Committee of the University of Chicago, the American Council of Education, and the Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Abstract: This publication is the opening number of a series which the Psychometric Society proposes to issue. It reports the first large experimental inquiry, carried out by the methods of factor analysis described by Thurstone in The Vectors of the Mind 1. The work was made possible by financial grants from the Social Science Research Committee of the University of Chicago, the American Council of Education, and the Carnegie Corporation of New York. The results are eminently worthy of the assistance so generously accorded. Thurstone’s previous theoretical account, lucid and comprehensive as it is, is intelligible only to those who have a knowledge of matrix algebra. Hence his methods have become known to British educationists chiefly from the monograph published by W. P. Alexander8. This enquiry has provoked a good deal of criticism, particularly from Professor Spearman’s school ; and differs, as a matter of fact, from Thurstone’s later expositions. Hence it is of the greatest value to have a full and simple illustration of his methods, based on a concrete inquiry, from Professor Thurstone himself.
TL;DR: The use of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis is examined in this paper, with particular attention given to situations where there is a complex factor pattern and standard methods yield poor solutions.
Abstract: The use of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis will be examined. Particular attention will be given to situations where there is a complex factor pattern and standard methods yield poor solutions. Some little known but interesting rotation criteria will be discussed and methods for weighting variables will be examined. Illustrations will be provided using Thurstone's 26 variable box data and other examples.
TL;DR: This paper discusses some methods of factor analysis and considers some mathematical problems of the model, such as whether certain kinds of observed data determine the model uniquely, and treats the statistical problems of estimation and tests of certain hypotheses.
Abstract: In this paper we discuss some methods of factor analysis. The entire discussion is centered around one general probability model. We consider some mathematical problems of the model, such as whether certain kinds of observed data determine the model uniquely. We treat the statistical problems of estimation and tests of certain hypotheses. For these purposes the asymptotic distribution theory of some statistics is treated. The primary aim of this paper is to give a unified exposition of this part of factor analysis from the viewpoint of the mathematical statistician. The literature on factor analysis is scattered; moreover, the many papers and books have been written from many different points of view. By confining ourselves to one model and by emphasizing statistical inferences for this model we hope to present a clear picture to the statistician. The development given here is expected to point up features of model-building and statistical inference that occur in other areas where statistical theories are being developed. For example, nearly all of the problems met in factor analysis are met in latent structure analysis. There are also some new results given in this paper. The proofs of these are mainly given in a technical Part II of the paper. In confining.ourselves to the mathematical and statistical aspects of one model, we are leaving out of consideration many important and interesting topics. We shall not consider how useful this model may be nor in what substantive areas one may expect to find data (and problems) that fit the model. We also do not consider methods based on other models. In doing this, we do not mean to imply that the model considered here is the most useful or important. It seems that this model has some usefulness and importance, it has been studied considerably, and one can give a fairly unified exposition of it. Extensive discussion of the purposes and applications (as well as other developments) of factor analysis is given in books by psychologists (for example, Holzinger and Harmon [10], Thomson [23], Thurstone [24]). Some general discussion of statistical inference has been given in papers by Bartlett [9] and Kendall [12].
TL;DR: In this paper, a review of the structure of cognitive abilities suggested by Spearman, Thurstone, Guilford, Vernon and Cattell-Horn is presented, with the g-factor at the top, two broad factors reflecting the ability to deal with verbal and figural information, respectively, at the second-order level, and the primary factors in the Thurstone/Guilford tradition at the lowest level.