TL;DR: The essays in the collection as discussed by the authors address generational tensions that have resulted from changing realities in the particular cultures under examination, and the consequence of the manipulation of memory in preand post-conflict situations.
Abstract: events—which, they contend, continue to shape African life long after the original conflicts themselves have abated. The essays in the collection address two main themes. The first is the generational tensions that have resulted from changing realities in the particular cultures under examination. In part, shifting attitudes toward, and the availability of, traditional ideologies of masculinity have brought about differences of opinion between younger men and their elders. But, as many of the chapters assert, situations of conflict and the resulting changes in economic, social, and political circumstances have intensified these differences. Detailed expositions of gang warfare resulting from such isolation in Sierra Leone, South Africa, and Nigeria provide a picture of the frustration of young men with a system that excludes them at nearly every level. The second theme focuses on the consequence of the manipulation of memory in preand post-conflict situations. In post-conflict contexts, remembered events can be constructed in such a way as to privilege one group over another. It is often the case that victorious regimes attempt to rewrite history in an attempt to preserve their authority. Particularly in the essays dealing with Guinea-Bissau, Rwanda, and Zimbabwe, the reconstruction of memory and, consequently, key narratives created in the wake of victory have shaped the manner in which conflict and recovery have been managed—which the authors of these chapters carefully reveal.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine developments in Islamic feminism and offer a critique of feminist theories, which construct it as an authentic and indigenous emancipatory alternative to secular feminisms.
Abstract: This article examines developments in ‘Islamic feminism’, and offers a critique of feminist theories, which construct it as an authentic and indigenous emancipatory alternative to secular feminisms. Focusing on Iranian theocracy, I argue that the Islamization of gender relations has created an oppressive patriarchy that cannot be replaced through legal reforms. While many women in Iran resist this religious and patriarchal regime, and an increasing number of Iranian intellectuals and activists, including Islamists, call for the separation of state and religion, feminists of a cultural relativist and postmodernist persuasion do not acknowledge the failure of the Islamic project. I argue that western feminist theory, in spite of its advances, is in a state of crisis since (a) it is challenged by the continuation of patriarchal domination in the West in the wake of legal equality between genders, (b) suspicious of the universality of patriarchy, it overlooks oppressive gender relations in non-western societies and (c) rejecting Eurocentrism and racism, it endorses the fragmentation of women of the world into religious, national, ethnic, racial and cultural entities with particularist agendas.
TL;DR: Goldberg's Kingdom Coming as mentioned in this paper explores the influence of dominionism in American life, showing how an increasingly bellicose fundamentalism is gaining traction throughout our national life, taking us on a tour of the parallel right-wing evangelical culture that is buoyed by Republican political patronage.
Abstract: Michelle Goldberg, a senior political reporter for Salon.com, has been covering the intersection of politics and ideology for years. Before the 2004 election, and during the ensuing months when many Americans were trying to understand how an administration marked by cronyism, disregard for the national budget, and poorly disguised self-interest had been reinstated, Goldberg traveled through the heartland of a country in the grips of a fevered religious radicalism: the America of our time. From the classroom to the mega-church to the federal court, she saw how the growing influence of dominionism-the doctrine that Christians have the right to rule nonbelievers-is threatening the foundations of democracy. In Kingdom Coming, Goldberg demonstrates how an increasingly bellicose fundamentalism is gaining traction throughout our national life, taking us on a tour of the parallel right-wing evangelical culture that is buoyed by Republican political patronage. Deep within the red zones of a divided America, we meet military retirees pledging to seize the nation in Christ's name, perfidious congressmen courting the confidence of neo-confederates and proponents of theocracy, and leaders of federally funded programs offering Jesus as the solution to the country's social problems. With her trenchant interviews and the telling testimonies of the people behind this movement, Goldberg gains access into the hearts and minds of citizens who are striving to remake the secular Republic bequeathed by our founders into a Christian nation run according to their interpretation of scripture. In her examination of the ever-widening divide between believers and nonbelievers, Goldberg illustrates the subversive effect of this conservative stranglehold nationwide. In an age when faith rather than reason is heralded and the values of the Enlightenment are threatened by a mystical nationalism claiming divine sanction, Kingdom Coming brings us face to face with the irrational forces that are remaking much of America.
TL;DR: Arjomand as mentioned in this paper offers a richly researched sociological and historical study of Shi'ism and the political order of premodern Iran that exposes the roots of what became Khomeini's theocracy.
Abstract: Dismissing oversimplified and politically-charged views of the politics of Shi'ite Islam, Said Amir Arjomand offers a richly researched sociological and historical study of Shi'ism and the political order of premodern Iran that exposes the roots of what became Khomeini's theocracy.
TL;DR: Goodstein et al. as mentioned in this paper reported that Gov. Palin has long associations with religious leaders who practice a brand of Pentecostalism known as "spiritual warfare" which believes that demonic forces can colonize specific geographic areas and individuals.
Abstract: Not all spirits have retreated to metaphor, even in the very public sphere of U.S. electoral politics. As we learned during the last presidential campaign, Governor Sarah Palin enlisted the help of Kenyan pastor Thomas Muthee during his 2005 visit to Alaska to cast out the spirits that hindered her career. The New York Times elaborated, “Ms. Palin has long associations with religious leaders who practice a … brand of Pentecostalism known as ‘spiritual warfare.’ Its adherents believe that demonic forces can colonize specific geographic areas and individuals.… Critics say the goal of the spiritual warfare movement is to create a theocracy” (Goodstein 2008, my emphasis).