About: Tattoo ink is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 210 publications have been published within this topic receiving 2667 citations. The topic is also known as: tattoo colors.
TL;DR: Concerns are the potential for phototoxicity, substance migration, and the possible metabolic conversion of tattoo ink ingredients into toxic substances, which apply to cleavage products that are formed during laser-assisted tattoo removal.
TL;DR: Although most tattoos are not darkened by laser treatment, short-pulsed lasers over a wide spectrum can cause immediate darkening of some tattoo inks, and patients are warned of the potential for irreversible cosmetic tattoo darkening.
Abstract: Background: High-energy, short-pulse lasers, eg, Q-switched lasers, emitting visible and near-infrared light have recently been developed for removing tattoos, with little risk of scarring. The mechanisms of action, and possible adverse effects other than scarring and hypopigmentation, are not fully understood. Observations: We describe five cases of pulsed-laser— induced, immediate, irreversible darkening of cosmetic, white, flesh (skin-color), and pink-red colored tattoos. Irreversible ink darkening can be an insidious complication, because immediate whitening of the skin temporarily obscures the subsequently impressive color change. Among these cases, irreversible ink darkening occurred with Q-switched ruby (694 nm), Q-switched neodymium (Nd):YAG (1064 nm/532 nm), and pulsed green dye (510 nm) lasers. Attempts to remove the darkened ink with further laser treatment failed in two cases, and surgical excision was necessary. In the other three cases, subsequent laser treatments successfully removed the darkened ink. The red cosmetic tattoo ink used in one of the cases was placed in agar in vitro and was converted to a black compound immediately on Q-switched ruby laser exposure. Ferric oxide, a brown-red ingredient commonly used in cosmetic tattoos, was similarly tested and blackened in vitro by Q-switched ruby laser exposures. Conclusions: Although most tattoos are not darkened by laser treatment, short-pulsed lasers over a wide spectrum can cause immediate darkening of some tattoo inks. Patients should be warned of the potential for irreversible cosmetic tattoo darkening, and test-site exposures should be performed prior to treatment. In some cases, subsequent laser treatments may remove the blackened ink. The mechanism probably involves, at least for some tattoos, reduction of ferric oxide (Fe 2 O 3 , "rust") to ferrous oxide (FeO, jet black), but the chemical reaction that is involved remains unknown. ( Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:1010-1014)
TL;DR: The composition of elements in tattoo inks varies greatly, even among like-colored pigments, and knowledge of the chemical composition of popular tattoo inKS might aid the clinician in effective laser removal.
Abstract: Background: The composition of cosmetic tattoos might prove relevant to their treatment by high-powered lasers. Objectives: To test the accuracy and completeness of information supplied by the tattoo ink manufacturers and to perform an elemental assay of tattoo pigments using scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive xray analysis. Design: Samples of 30 tattoo inks were examined using “standardless” energy-dispersive spectrometry. This technique uses quantitative electron x-ray microanalysis. The technique reliably identifies all elements with the exception of those elements with atomic numbers less than 11. Setting: A major national referral laboratory for microscopic examination and biochemical analysis of tissue. These results were compared with ink compositions compiled from manufacturer-supplied material safety data sheets. Main Outcome Measures: (1) The percentage of any given element in whole tattoo pigments. (2) The presence or absence of elements and/or compounds as recorded in material safety data sheets supplied by the tattoo ink manufacturers. Results: Of the 30 tattoo inks studied, the most commonly identified elements were aluminum (87% of the pigments), oxygen (73% of the pigments), titanium (67% of the pigments), and carbon (67% of the pigments). The relative contribution of elements to the tattoo ink compositions was highly variable between different compounds. Overall, the manufacturer-supplied data sheets were consistent with the elemental analysis, but there were important exceptions. Conclusion: The composition of elements in tattoo inks varies greatly, even among like-colored pigments. Knowledge of the chemical composition of popular tattoo inks might aid the clinician in effective laser removal. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137:143-147
TL;DR: Clinical observation and epidemiology disagree with register data, which indicate an increased risk of cancer due to chemical carcinogens present in some inks, however, tattooing in humans is essentially a single-dose exposure, which might explain the observed discrepancy.
Abstract: Tattoos cause a broad range of clinical problems. Mild complaints, especially sensitivity to sun, are very common and seen in 1/5 of cases. Medical complications are dominated by allergy to tattoo pigment haptens or haptens generated in the skin, especially in red tattoos but also in blue and green tattoos. Symptoms are major and can be compared to cumbersome pruritic skin diseases. Tattoo allergies and local reactions show distinct clinical manifestations, with plaque-like, excessive hyperkeratotic, ulcero-necrotic, lymphopathic, neuro-sensory, and scar patterns. Reactions in black tattoos are papulo-nodular and non-allergic and associated with the agglomeration of nanoparticulate carbon black. Tattoo complications include effects on general health conditions and complications in the psycho-social sphere. Tattoo infections with bacteria, especially staphylococci, which may be resistant to multiple antibiotics, may be prominent and may progress into life-threatening sepsis. Contaminated tattoo ink is an open-window risk vector that can lead to epidemic tattoo infections across national borders due to contaminated bulk production. Hepatitis B and C and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transferred by tattooing remain a significant risk needing active prevention. It is noteworthy that cancer arising in tattoos, in regional lymph nodes, and in other organs due to tattoo pigments and ingredients has not been detected or noted as a significant clinical problem hitherto, despite millions of people being tattooed for decennia. Clinical observation and epidemiology disagree with register data, which indicate an increased risk of cancer due to chemical carcinogens present in some inks. Registers rely on chronic dosaging of cell lines and animals. However, tattooing in humans is essentially a single-dose exposure, which might explain the observed discrepancy.
TL;DR: This work has shown that tattooing can be a viable method for introducing nanoparticles into the human body by the intradermal route and the content of NPs in tattoo inks is unknown.
Abstract: Summary
Background To our knowledge tattooing has never been thought of as a method of introducing nanoparticles (NPs) into the human body by the intradermal route, and as such it has never been a topic of research in nanotoxicology. The content of NPs in tattoo inks is unknown.
Objectives To classify the particle sizes in tattoo inks in general usage.
Methods The particle size was measured by laser diffraction, electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction.
Results The size of the pigments could be divided into three main classes. The black pigments were the smallest, the white pigments the largest and the coloured pigments had a size in between the two. The vast majority of the tested tattoo inks contained significant amounts of NPs except for the white pigments. The black pigments were almost pure NPs, i.e. particles with at least one dimension < 100 nm.
Conclusions The finding of NPs in tattoo inks in general usage is new and may contribute to the understanding of tattoo ink kinetics. How the body responds to NP tattoo pigments should be examined further.