TL;DR: The Vertex and Bisector Transformation (VBT) takes the image gradient as input and outputs two arrays, accumulating evidence of respectively angle vertex and angle bisector.
Abstract: We present a new transformation for angle vertex and bisector detection. The Vertex and Bisector Transformation (VBT) takes the image gradient as input and outputs two arrays, accumulating evidence of respectively angle vertex and angle bisector. A geometric model of the gradient orientation is implemented using a pair-wise voting scheme: normal vectors of two adjacent sides of a triangle have a specific relationship depending on the corresponding vertex angle. Our approach is able to accurately detect vertices and bisectors of a triangular road sign in a 360×270 image in about 50 ms with no particular optimization. We tested our approach on a 48 images database containing 40 triangular signs with different colors and orientations (red intersection and give way warnings, blue pedestrian crossing): 33 are correctly detected (82%) and 7 are missed with 2 false positives.
TL;DR: It is shown that the bisector may be regarded as (a subset of) a “variable-distance” offset curve to C which has the attractive property, unlike fixed-distance offsets, of being generically a rational curve.
TL;DR: Given a point and a rational curve in the plane, their bisector curve is rational and given two rational space curves, the bisector surface is rational (except for the degenerate case in which the two curves are coplanar).
Abstract: Given a point and a rational curve in the plane, their bisector curve is rational [Farouki and Johnston 1994a]. However, in general, the bisector of two rational curves in the plane is not rational [Farouki and Johnstone 1994b]. Given a point and a rational space curve, this art icle shows that the bisector surface is a rational ruled surface. Moreover, given two rational space curves, we show that the bisector surface is rational (except for the degenerate case in which the two curves are coplanar).
TL;DR: Evidence is provided for a novel illusion where an angle embedded in an isosceles triangle is judged substantially larger than the same angles embedded in a scalene triangle, demonstrating that mechanisms for computing angles are sensitive to the context within which angles are presented.
TL;DR: The Brocard points as mentioned in this paper are a special points associated with the triangle, and the Brocard angle of a plane triangle can be seen as a special point in the triangle geometry.
Abstract: In the flourishing days of triangle geometry, many special points were discovered and investigated. Apart from well-known points like the centroid (or median point), the orthocenter, and the circumcenter, 'new' triangle points were studied, points called the symmedian point (or point of Lemoine) and the points of Gergonne, Nagel, Torelli, and Brocard, to name but a few. There is little doubt in my mind that the Brocard points rank amongst the most interesting of these special points associated with the triangle. Although general interest has long since waned and results once regarded as important have sunk into oblivion, it might still be worth our while to revive some of the gems of triangle geometry. In the brilliant light of modern knowledge we might even discover new and interesting insights. In the literature on Euclidean geometry some books can be singled out that deal exclusively with the geometry of the triangle and the circle. An excellent monograph is [4], and for those with a smattering of German [3] gives much information, too; [5] is of a more general nature, but this work also contains many pages devoted to the triangle and its associated points. Finally, the Brocard configuration is the singular topic of Emmerich's treatise [2], recommendable for its proverbial 'Griindlichkeit.' In the rich field of Brocardian geometry, our attention shall be focused on the set of triangles equibrocardal to a given triangle (T). In order to explain the terminology, our first concern should be with the reader who wishes to be introduced to the Brocard points and the Brocard angle of a plane triangle. Well then, given a triangle (T) with vertices A1, A2, and A3, notation: (T) = A1A2A3, the first (or positive) Brocard point of (T) is the unique point Q such that the angles ZQA1A2, zQA2A3, and zQA3A1 are equal. The second (or negative)