TL;DR: In patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma 1997 TNM stage, tumor size, nuclear grade and histological tumor necrosis were significantly associated with cancer specific survival, and a scoring system based on these features can be used to predict outcome.
TL;DR: This study analyzes the criteria by which the CRM needs to be assessed to predict local recurrence for nonirradiated patients and shows that an increased risk is present when margins are ≤2 mm, compared with earlier studies.
Abstract: Despite improved surgical treatment strategies for rectal cancer, 5-15% of all patients will develop local recurrences. After conservative surgery, circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement is a strong predictor of local recurrence. The consequences of a positive CRM after total mesorectal excision (TME) have not been evaluated in a large patient population. In a nationwide randomized multicenter trial comparing preoperative radiotherapy and TME versus TME alone for rectal cancer, CRM involvement was determined according to trial protocol. In this study we analyze the criteria by which the CRM needs to be assessed to predict local recurrence for nonirradiated patients (n = 656, median follow-up 35 months). CRM involvement is a strong predictor for local recurrence after TME. A margin of < or = 2 mm is associated with a local recurrence risk of 16% compared with 5.8% in patients with more mesorectal tissue surrounding the tumor (p <0.0001). In addition, patients with margins < or = 1 mm have an increased risk for distant metastases (37.6% vs 12.7%, p <0.0001) as well as shorter survival. The prognostic value of CRM involvement is independent of TNM classification. Accurate determination of CRM in rectal cancer is important for determination of local recurrence risk, which might subsequently be prevented by additional therapy. In contrast to earlier studies, we show that an increased risk is present when margins are < or = 2 mm.
TL;DR: It is still not clear whether obtaining a radical margin will decrease the rate of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery, but it is absolutely unacceptable to have tumor cells directly at the cut edge of the excised specimen, regardless of the type of post-surgical adjuvant therapy.
Abstract: Background Patients receiving breast conservation therapy have a lifelong risk of local recurrence. To minimize this risk, surgeons have explored various approaches to examining the surgical margins of the resection specimen. If tumor cells are found at the margin, there is a high probability that residual tumor remains in the surgical cavity. This review examines published reports about standard and innovative approaches to assessing surgical margins, the clinical significance of margin size, and risk factors for positive margins. Methods: Published literature abstracted in Medline was reviewed using the Gateway site from the National Library of Medicine. Conclusions It is still not clear whether obtaining a radical margin will decrease the rate of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery. What is clear is that it is absolutely unacceptable to have tumor cells directly at the cut edge of the excised specimen, regardless of the type of post-surgical adjuvant therapy.
TL;DR: Men undergoing RRP for clinically localized prostate cancer showed a 16% actuarial rate of development of metastatic disease at 10 years, considerably better than conservative therapy and justifies RRP as the treatment of choice for men with clinically localized disease who are otherwise healthy and have a greater than 10-year life expectancy.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated the clinical outcome of patients with chordoma using modern surgical principles aimed at complete resection and to identify prognostic factors such as larger tumor size, performance of an invasive morphologic diagnostic procedure outside of the tumor center, inadequate surgical margins, microscopic tumor necrosis, Ki-67 > 5%, and local recurrence were found to be adverse prognosis factors.