Subsoiler

Abstract: Soil compaction caused by random traffic or repetitive tillage has been shown to reduce water use efficiency, and thus crop yield due to reduced porosity, decreased water infiltration and availability of nutrients. Conservation tillage coupled with subsoiling in northern China is widely believed to reduce soil compaction, which was created after many years of no-till. However, limited research has been conducted on the most effective time interval for subsoiling, under conservation tillage. Data from conservation tillage demonstration sites operating for 10 years in northern China were used to conduct a comparative study of subsoiling interval under conservation tillage. Three modes of traditional tillage, subsoiling with soil cover and no-till with soil cover were compared using 10 years of soil bulk density, water content, yield and water use efficiency data. Cost benefit analysis was conducted on subsoiling time interval under conservation tillage. Yield and power consumption were assessed by based on the use of a single pass combine subsoiler and planter. Annual subsoiling was effective in reducing bulk density by only 4.9% compared with no-till treatments on the silty loam soils of the Loess plateau, but provided no extra benefit in terms of soil water loss, yield increase or water utilization. With the exception of bulk density, no-till and subsoiling with cover were vastly superior in increasing water use (+10.5%) efficiency and yield (+12.9%) compared to traditional tillage methods. Four years of no-till followed by one subsoiling reduced mechanical inputs by 62%, providing an economic benefit of 49% for maize and 209% for wheat production compared to traditional tillage. Annual subsoiling reduced inputs by 25% with an increased economic benefit of 23% for maize and 135% for wheat production. Yield and power consumption was improved by 5% and 20%, respectively, by combining subsoiling with the planting operation in one pass compared with multipass operations of subsoiling and planting. A key conclusion from this is that annual subsoiling in dryland areas of northern China is uneconomical and unwarranted. Four years of no-till operations followed by 1 year subsoiling provided some relief from accumulated soil compaction. However, minimum soil disturbance and maximum soil cover are key elements of no-till for saving water and improving yields. Improved yields and reduced farm power consumption could provide a significant base on which to promote combined planter and subsoiling operations throughout northern China. Further research is required to develop a better understanding of the linkages between conservation tillage, soil quality and yield, aimed at designing most appropriate conservation tillage schemes.

Abstract: For many coastal plain soils in the southeastern USA, high soil strength within subsurface horizons requires that deep tillage be performed to provide a suitable rooting environment for row crops such as maize (Zea mays L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). We hypothesized that water filtering through the soil was recompacting it and that recompaction could be correlated with cumulative amount of rainfall since tillage. We measured cone indices in a structureless, fine loamy Acrisol near Florence, South Carolina, from 7 days to about 6 years after treatments were deep tilled. Measurements were made to a depth of 0.55 m at the point of maximum disruption of a bent-leg subsoiler (Paratill ® ) that tilled to a depth of 0.35–0.40 m. Regressions of cone indices with cumulative rainfall explained 67–91% of the recompaction and indicated that water filtering through the soil was causing the recompaction. Recompaction was slow, still taking place 6 years after tillage (the end of the experiment) probably because of controlled traffic or excessive disruption by the paratill. Recompaction was also temporarily greater for the 0.1–0.2 m depths when compared with that in the 0.25–0.35 m depths indicating that it was moving down the profile. Recompaction in other climates may be faster or slower depending on their cumulative rainfall relative to an annual amount of 900–1350 mm per year for this study and recompaction for structured soils may be faster or slower depending on whether the structure is stable or not. Though recompaction in this study was slow, tillage may still be necessary annually or seasonally because yield can be reduced even by incomplete recompaction that increases soil strength after a year or less. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.