TL;DR: An annotated taxonomic and nomenclatural catalogue of the insect order Strepsiptera is presented, showing known distributions and host associations as they are currently known.
Abstract: An annotated taxonomic and nomenclatural catalogue of the insect order Strepsiptera is presented. Known distributions and host associations are given as they are currently known. As of this publication, there are 627 valid species, 28 of which are known only from fossils. The misspelling of Viridipromontorius as Viridopromontoriusn. syn. (Roy and Niladri, 2016) is corrected to include Viridipromontorius aequus n. comb.Caenocholax pierci is moved to the genus Myrmecolax and becomes Myrmecolax pierci (Chattopadhyay and Chaudhuri, 1980) n. comb. Stichotrema trinadadensisGuenther, 1949) n. comb. is moved from Stichotrema to Myrmecolax. Halictophagus bohartiAbdulla, 1974 n. stat. was previously a junior synonym of Halictophagus variatus due to its being an invalid renaming of a homonym. The following species are reinstated as valid: Pseudoxenos andradeiLuna de Carvalho, 1953; Pseudoxenos atlanticusLuna de Carvalho, 1969 n. stat.; Pseudoxenos corcyricusSaunders, 1872; Pseudoxenos klugii (Saunders, 1852); Pseudoxenos lusitanicusLuna de Carvalho, 1960; Pseudoxenos schaumiiSaunders, 1872; Pseudoxenos seyrigi Monod, 1926; Stylops aburanaeKifune and Maeta, 1990 n. stat.; Stylops ainoKifune and Maeta, 1990 n. stat.; Stylops alfkeniHofeneder, 1939 n. stat; Stylops bimaculatae Perkins, 1918 n. stat.; Stylops bisalicidis Pierce, 1918 n. stat.; Stylops championi Pierce, 1918 n. stat.; Stylops collinusKifune and Maeta, 1990 n. stat.; Stylops dentataeKifune and Maeta, 1990 n. stat.; Stylops dominiqueiPierce, 1909 n. stat.; Stylops duboisi Bohart, 1937 n. stat.; Stylops duriensisLuna de Carvalho, 1974 n. stat.; Stylops esteponensisLuna de Carvalho, 1974 n. stat.; Stylops flavipedisHofeneder, 1923 n. stat.; Stylops fukuiensis Kifune, 1991 n. stat.; Stylops giganteusLuna de Carvalho, 1974 n. stat.; Stylops hirashimaiKifune and Maeta, 1990 n. stat.; Stylops izumoensisKifune and Maeta, 1990 n. stat.; Stylops krygeri Pierce, 1918 n. stat.; Stylops mandibularisPierce, 1911 n. stat.; Stylops medionitansPierce, 1919 n. stat.; Stylops moestae Pierce, 1918 n. stat.; Stylops muelleri Borchert, 1971 n. stat.; Stylops neonanae Pierce 1918 n. stat.; Stylops nipponicusKifune and Maeta, 1990 n. stat.; Stylops nitidaePasteels 1954 n. stat.; Stylops nitidiusculaePoluszynski 1927 n. stat.; Stylops oblongulusKifune and Hirashima, 1985 n. stat.; Stylops oklahomaePierce, 1909 n. stat.; Stylops orientisKifune and Maeta, 1990 n. stat.; Stylops pacificusBohart, 1936 n. stat.; Stylops perkinsiPasteels 1949 n. stat.; Stylops saliciflorisPierce, 1909 n. stat.; Stylops subcircularisKifune and Maeta, 1990 n. stat.; Stylops swenkiPierce 1909 n. stat.; Stylops truncatoidesKifune and Hirashima, 1985 n. stat. Stylops truncatusKifune and Hirashima, 1985 n. stat.; Xenos myrapetrus (Trois, 1988).
TL;DR: Internal and external head structures of males of Strepsiptera were examined and the head of a species of Mengenilla is described in detail, suggesting a reinterpretation of some structures and a closer relationship of Elenchus with these taxa.
Abstract: Internal and external head structures of males of Strepsiptera were examined and the head of a species of Mengenilla is described in detail. The results suggest a reinterpretation of some structures. The head of basal extant strepsipterans is subprognathous, whereas it is strictly orthognathous in the groundplan of Strepsiptera s.l. The labrum and hypopharynx are not part of the mouthfield sclerite. The labial palps are absent in all strepsipterans. A very slightly modified mandibular articulation is preserved in Eoxenos, whereas it is distinctly reduced in other extant groups. A salivary duct, salivary glands, and a cephalic aorta are absent. The cladistic analysis of 44 characters of the head results in the following branching pattern: (Protoxenos + (Mengea + (Eoxenos + (Mengenilla [Austr.] + Mengenilla) + (Elenchus + Dundoxenos + Xenos + Stylops)))). Most apomorphies of males are associated with the necessity of finding females within a short time span and with a reduced necessity to consume food: large "raspberry" eyes, flabellate antennae with numerous dome-shaped chemoreceptors, Hofeneder's organ, an ovoid sensillum of the maxillary palp, and the simplified condition of the maxilla and the labium. Strepsiptera excl. Protoxenos are supported by the dorsomedian frontal impression, the dorsally shifted antennal insertions, a reduced number of antennal segments, absence of the galea, and probably by the presence of the mouthfield sclerite, which is a unique apomorphic feature. The balloon-gut combined with an unusual air-uptake apparatus is another possible autapomorphy of this clade. It is likely that the last common ancestor of Strepsiptera excl. Protoxenos did not process food. Strepsiptera s.str. are characterized by the strongly reduced condition of the labrum and the absence of the epistomal suture. Eoxenos is the sister group of the remaining Strepsiptera s.str. Synapomorphies of Mengenilla + Stylopidia are the advanced reduction of the mandibular articulation and the secondary absence of the ovoid sensillum. The monophyly of Mengenilla is confirmed, even though a small free labrum is present in Australian species. Derived features of Stylopidia are the absence of the coronal suture and the reduced condition of the frontal suture. Apomorphies that have evolved within Stylopidia are the membranization of parts of the head, the fusion of antennal segments, the increase or decrease of the number of flabellate flagellomeres, reductions and modifications of the mandibles, and modifications of the mouthfield sclerite. The monophyly of Stylopiformia is not unambiguously supported. A position of the mandibles posterior to the mouthfield sclerite (when adducted) is a possible synapomorphy shared by Xenos, Stylops, and other "higher Stylopidia." The blade-like distal part of the mandibles suggests a closer relationship of Elenchus with these taxa.
TL;DR: It is documented that the time of emergence/activity in stylopised females follows the temporal trend of uninfected, protandrous males, and the potential adaptive value of the altered host behaviour for the parasite is ascribed to host manipulation.
Abstract: Stylopised (= parasitised by Strepsiptera Stylopidae) imagoes of Andrena (Hymenoptera Andrenidae) bees are known to exhibit intersexual morphology. Until now, their abnormal morphology has been thought to result from undernourishment of parasitised larvae during development. This hypothesis, however, dos not fit to mass provisioning Hymenoptera. We hypothesised that induced changes in the suite of morphological characters might be a consequence of manipulation of sex-specific behavioural traits by a strepsipteran parasite. Thus, the masculinised morphology of stylopised females might be connected with shifts in their sexual behaviour. Here, we tested the effect of Stylops (Strepsiptera Stylopidae) infection on the timing of spring nest emergence in Andrena bees, where males generally emerged conspicuously earlier than conspecific females. We used two independent data samplings – pan trapping and direct observation – to avoid possible bias caused by one of the methods. In accordance with our hypothesis, we...
TL;DR: External features of the embryonic development of Stylops ovinae (Strepsiptera) were examined and many embryological traits are closely correlated to the parasitic life style of the first instar larvae or to vivipary.