TL;DR: In the case of complete coincidence, the authors show that the careers of the statue and the piece of clay which made it up are entirely coincident, since the two came into being at the same time and ceased to be at different times.
Abstract: Suppose that a statue of Goliath is made by fusing together two appropriately shaped pieces of clay and that after a few minutes, the artisan, frustrated with his work, dissolves the statue in a solvent which destroys clay and statue alike. Then a natural thing to say is that the careers of the statue and the lump or piece of clay which made it up are entirely coincident. The statue and the piece of clay came into being at the same time and ceased to be at the same time. Throughout their respective careers, the piece of clay constituted the statue. Had the artisan despaired only of the arms and calves of Goliath and dissolved only them, replacing them with new pieces of appropriately molded clay, then we should say that distinct but not wholly distinct pieces of clay constituted the statue of Goliath over its lifetime. In this second case we naturally conclude that the statue is not absolutely identical with the whole piece of clay which originally constituted it, since the piece arguably did not survive the dissolving of significant parts of it, while the statue clearly did survive the dissolving; as is evidenced by the fact that the statue had new arms and calves attached to it. So also, it seems natural to conclude that even in the first case in which the original piece of clay constituted the statue throughout its entire career, the statue is not absolutely identical with the clay, since the statue could have survived certain changes which the piece of clay would not have survived, e.g. the changes described in the second case. Philosophers have gone to some lengths to resist this last conclusion. Thus David Lewis, Alan Gibbard, Anil Gupta and Denis Robinson all allege that something special about modal predication invalidates the argument to non-identity in the case of complete coincidence.' Concentrating on Lewis's way of putting the point, since it fits neatly into a familiar systematic way of thinking of modality, the situation is supposed&to be as follows.2 If the term "Lumpl" names the piece of clay which makes up the statue Goliath, the aim is to defend
TL;DR: The context of royal portraits: media for the royal image functions of royal statues statue types, diadems and attributes royal image and kingship theory as discussed by the authors, and sculptured portraits: Alexander and Diadochs the Villa of Papyri other mid-Hellenistic portraits the Ptolemies and Egypt the later Hellenistic period.
Abstract: Part 1 The context of royal portraits: media for the royal image functions of royal statues statue types, diadems and attributes royal image and kingship theory. Part 2 The sculptured portraits: Alexander and Diadochs the Villa of the Papyri other mid-Hellenistic portraits the Ptolemies and Egypt the later Hellenistic period. Part 3 Portraits and politics: king and city to the 2nd century late Hellenistic and Parthian kings Romans and their friends Pompey, Augustus and kings under Empire. Appendices: 1 - the Hellenistic dynasties 2 - previous studies 3 - Philip II 4 - Torlonia "Euthydemos" 5 - 3rd century Ptolemies 6 - Cyprus 7 - Iran 8 - statues and statuettes.
TL;DR: The question of Caesar's divinity and the problem of his cult statue is addressed in this article, where the authors propose a solution to the problem by making men gods and making men make men gods.
Abstract: 1. Making men gods 2. The question of Caesar's divinity and the problem of his cult statue 3. Augural images: old traditions and new institutions 4. Romulus, Quirinus, genius, divus 5. Caesar's portrait and the Simulacrum Divi Iulii 6. Auspicious, propitious, victorious 7. Representation in an era of divinization 8. Ad urbem et ex urbe: the imagery of the divus and its fate 9. Coda: reverberations in the east.
TL;DR: In 2003, a digitally-produced image of the Statue of Liberty, draped in a burqa and carrying a copy of the Qur'an, was banned by a city council in the English Midlands from a touring exhib...
Abstract: In February 2003, a digitally-produced image of the Statue of Liberty, draped in a burqa and carrying a copy of the Qur'an, was banned by a city council in the English Midlands from a touring exhib...
TL;DR: In this article, the Roman Empire in 41 AD is described as follows: the problem of Claudius 1. Claudius Caesar 2. A statue in silver 3. Imperial favors 4. Subduing the ocean 5. Lists of peoples and places 6. Caesar-lovers 7. The eight hundredth year of Rome 8. Practical pyramids 9. The burden of government 10. The judgment of Pallas 11. Signaling retreat? 12.
Abstract: Prologue: the Roman Empire in 41 AD Introduction: the problem of Claudius 1. Claudius Caesar 2. A statue in silver 3. Imperial favors 4. Subduing the ocean 5. Lists of peoples and places 6. Caesar-lovers 7. The eight hundredth year of Rome 8. Practical pyramids 9. The burden of government 10. The judgment of Pallas 11. Signaling retreat? 12. The golden predicament.