About: Soil compaction is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 3013 publications have been published within this topic receiving 53773 citations. The topic is also known as: Soil compaction.
TL;DR: In this paper, the importance of these factors in limiting forest regeneration in abandoned pastures was assessed in a recently abandoned pasture and adjacent primary rain forest in southern Costa Rica, and the results suggest that the most important limitation is lack of seed dispersal.
Abstract: Vegetation, seed rain, seed germination, microclimate, and soil physical and chemical parameters were measured in a recently abandoned pasture and adjacent primary rain forest in southern Costa Rica. The goal of this study was to assess the importance of these factors in limiting forest regeneration in abandoned pastures. Seed rain of animal dispersed species decreased dramatically in the pasture >5 m from the forestlpasture edge; fewer wind dispersed seeds fell in the pasture than in the forest, but the difference was much less than for animal dispersed seeds. Percent seed germination of most species studied was similar in the forest and in pasture with grasses; seed germination was lower during the dry season in areas of pasture cleared of grasses. Air temperature, vapor pressure deficit (VPD), and photon flux density (PFD) were much higher in the pasture than in the forest at 1 m above the ground. VPD and PFD at ground level and soil temperature were similar in the pasture and the forest, indicating that pasture grasses strongly modify microclimatic conditions near the soil surface. The lowest gravimetric water content recorded in the pasture during the dry season was 0.5 and leaf relative water contents of the two species measured in the forest and pasture were identical, suggesting that plants in the pasture were not water stressed. Levels of most soil nutrients were lower in the pasture as compared to the forest; however, aboveground and root biomass for seedlings grown in pasture and forest soils did not differ significantly. Although a number of factors impede forest recovery in abandoned pastures, these results suggest that the most important limitation is lack of seed dispersal.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compare methods to determine the degree of compactness (DC) and limits of field bulk density for plant growth under no-tillage in subtropical soils.
Abstract: The concept of degree of compactness (DC), referred to as field bulk density (BD) as a percentage of a reference bulk density (BD ref ), was developed to characterize compactness of soil frequently disturbed, but for undisturbed soil such as under no-tillage critical degree of compactness values have not been tested. The objective of this study was to compare methods to determine BD ref and limits of DC and BD for plant growth under no-tillage in subtropical soils. Data from the literature and other databases were used to establish relationships between BD and clay or clay plus silt content, and between DC and macroporosity and yield of crops under no-tillage in subtropical Brazil. Data of BD ref reached by the soil Proctor test on disturbed soil samples, by uniaxial compression with loads of 200 kPa on disturbed and undisturbed soil samples, and 400, 800 and 1600 kPa on undisturbed soil samples, were used. Also, comparisons were made with critical bulk density based on the least limiting water range (BDc LLWR) and on observed root and/or yield restriction in the field (BDc Rest). Using vertical uniaxial compression with a load of 200 kPa on disturbed or undisturbed samples generates low BD ref and high DC-values. The standard Proctor test generates higher BD ref -values, which are similar to those in a uniaxial test with a load of 1600 kPa for soils with low clay content but lower for soils with high clay content. The BDc LLWR does not necessarily restrict root growth or crop yield under no-tillage, since field investigations led to higher BDc Rest-values. A uniaxial load greater than 800 kPa is promising to determine BD ref for no-tillage soils. The BD ref is highly correlated to the clay content and thus pedotransfer functions may be established to estimate the former based on the latter. Soil ecological properties are affected before compaction restricts plant growth and yield. The DC is an efficient parameter to identify soil compaction affecting crops. The effect of compaction on ecological properties must also be further considered.
TL;DR: A review of the early literature on soil compaction and root growth can be found in this paper, where Howard M. Taylor and co-workers showed that root growth and distribution were altered to the point that water and nutrient uptake, and hence, plant growth and yield, were reduced when soil strength reached critical levels due to natural or induced compaction.
Abstract: Adverse effects of soil compaction on crop production have been recognized for many years. The objectives of this report were to briefly review the early literature, review the contributions of Dr. Howard M. Taylor (1924-1991) and co-workers, examine the current status of soil compaction and root growth research, and identify research needs related to soil compaction and root growth. Early in his career, Dr. Taylor and co-workers established relationships among soil strength, soil water content, and seedling emergence and root growth. These studies showed that root growth and distribution were altered to the point that water and nutrient uptake, and, hence, plant growth and yield, were reduced when soil strength reached critical levels due to natural or induced compaction. That research formed the basis for our current knowledge concerning the effects of compaction on root growth and the alleviation of compaction through soil and tillage management
TL;DR: In this paper, the impacts of organic matter removal and soil compaction are reported for the 26 oldest installations in the nation-wide network of long-term soil productivity sites, and the results show that complete removal of surface organic matter led to declines in soil C concentration to 20 cm depth and to reduced nutrient availability.
TL;DR: Extent and persistence of soil and crop responses to sub-soil compaction caused by vehicles with high axle loads are reviewed and methods to protect the subsoil from permanent deterioration are discussed.
Abstract: Extent and persistence of soil and crop responses to subsoil compaction caused by vehicles with high axle loads are reviewed and methods to protect the subsoil from permanent deterioration are discussed Traffic by vehicles with high axle loads on soils with high moisture contents generally causes deep subsoil compaction At an axle load of 10 Mg, compaction typically penetrates to a depth of 50 cm With still higher loads, compaction to a depth of 1 m has been reported Subsoil compaction is very persistent At depths of more than 40 cm it is virtually permanent even in clay soils in regions with annual freezing Deep subsoil compaction also causes persistent and possibly permanent reductions of crop yields Complete amelioration by mechanical loosening is usually impossible and definitely expensive From a soil productivity point of view, limits for mechanical stresses in the subsoil are needed These may have the form of axle load limits for the vehicles or a combination of limits for the axle load and for some other important factors, such as the ground contact pressure of the running gear or the per cent water saturation of the soil at the time of trafficking Guidelines for such limits should preferably be worked out in an international joint effort