TL;DR: The theoretical basis for the development of the studied system are described, the designation of the system and its components are presented and it is proved social and pedagogical system’s components.
Abstract: Purpose The article is devoted to the system of social and pedagogical support of сo-dependent familiesin terms of rehabilitation centres for drug addictsThe theoretical basis for the development of the studied system are described, the designation of the systemand its components are presented Methods On the basis of the theoretical analysis of scientific researches it is proved social and pedagogicalsystem’s componentsResults The components of the socio-pedagogical system are the target, content, technological, subjectobjectand environmental The principles of the socio-pedagogical system are the principle of voluntarinessand acceptance of assistance, confidentiality, self-help, interaction of individual and differentiated approach,consideration strengths, humanism and tolerance The content component is through the following componentsof work: 1) with сo-dependent separately; 2) with drug-addicted children separately; 3) together with bothсo-dependent and drug addictsSuch work also takes place both in rehabilitation centre environment and outside itThe subject of social and pedagogical support in rehabilitation centre environment are a social educatorand an interdisciplinary team of specialists, outside the centre – social groups and social services is defined bythe subject-object component The objects are co-dependent and drug addicts, micro and macro environmentof their interactionThe environmental component consists of such elements: the environment of the rehabilitation centre, socioenvironment, interfamily environmentConclusion The technological component of the studied system combines forms (training, flash mob,round table), methods (group, peer-to-peer, self-help), stages (diagnostic, stage of implementation, correctional,final) and means (information and communication, educational and methodical, material)
TL;DR: The strategic management approach for natural protected areas (NPA) has been evolving over time mainly in the last decades in which management has acquired a more integral and inclusive character.
Abstract: The strategic management approach for natural protected areas (NPA) has been evolving over time mainly in the last decades in which management has acquired a more integral and inclusive character. NPA management is a process whereby management planning is the principal strategy in which ideally the main actions are defined; it also facilitates the systematization of guidelines and procedures for the accomplishment of conservation and development objectives. Nowadays NPAs are not only confined to their traditional role of protecting symbolic natural elements; they have gradually evolved towards the mainstreaming of territories with representative samples of the biodiversity or presence of significant socioenvironment systems. In this way biodiversity is a central element for conservation but it is not the only component that should be considered in conservation. Such condition has given a new dimension to natural heritage protection but in particular to the NPA function and its management effectiveness. Therefore due to the urgency to articulate nature science to social science (Morin 2001), and in an effort to highlight the importance of establishing a balance between the action of the driving biophysical and socio-economic forces (Boada and Sauri 2003), we presume the need to address the study of environmental issues, including conservation science, from an integral, multidisciplinary and multicriteria perspective. Thus a more systematic approach for designing and planning nature reserves must be made compatible with biodiversity conservation and with fulfilling the local population demand for natural resources and territory. In Mexico, decrees, management and administration of NPAs have revealed over time, different dimensions and potentialities that reinforce their capacity as instruments of environmental policy. In one hand natural areas can generate a territorial matrix for conservation and sustainable development initiatives whereby it can be possible to harmonize development schemes with conservation policies. On the other