TL;DR: It is proposed that cognitive control stems from the active maintenance of patterns of activity in the prefrontal cortex that represent goals and the means to achieve them, which provide bias signals to other brain structures whose net effect is to guide the flow of activity along neural pathways that establish the proper mappings between inputs, internal states, and outputs needed to perform a given task.
Abstract: ▪ Abstract The prefrontal cortex has long been suspected to play an important role in cognitive control, in the ability to orchestrate thought and action in accordance with internal goals. Its neural basis, however, has remained a mystery. Here, we propose that cognitive control stems from the active maintenance of patterns of activity in the prefrontal cortex that represent goals and the means to achieve them. They provide bias signals to other brain structures whose net effect is to guide the flow of activity along neural pathways that establish the proper mappings between inputs, internal states, and outputs needed to perform a given task. We review neurophysiological, neurobiological, neuroimaging, and computational studies that support this theory and discuss its implications as well as further issues to be addressed
TL;DR: The sections in this article are: Essence of Prefrontal Function: Regulation of Behavior by Representational Knowledge, Multiple Subsystems of Pre Frontal Cortex: Unity or Diversity of Function, and Functional Speculations.
Abstract: The sections in this article are:
1
Essence of Prefrontal Function: Regulation of Behavior by Representational Knowledge
11
Subdivisions of Prefrontal Cortex
12
Global Nature of Prefrontal Syndrome in Humans
13
Animal Model for Prefrontal Function in Humans
14
Delayed-Response Tests and Varying Interpretations of Their Functional Significance
15
Distractability and Perseveration: Secondary Consequences of Basic Defect in Representational Memory
16
Representational Memory in Wisconsin Card Sort and Other Diagnostic Tests of Prefrontal Function in Humans
17
Localization of Delayed-Response Function: Principal Sulcus
18
Circuit Basis of Visuospatial Functions
2
Accessing and “On-Line” Processing of Representations in Visuospatial Domain: Parietal-Prefrontal Connections
21
Visuospatial Representational Memory in Humans
22
Spatial-Mnemonic Nature of Delayed-Response Deficit: Domain-Specific Memory Loss
23
Topography of Representational Memory in Prefrontal Cortex
24
Electrophysiological Evidence of Spatial-Mnemonic Processes in Principal Sulcus
25
Parietal-Prefrontal Connectivity
26
Columnar and Laminar Framework for Feedforward and Feedback Mechanisms
27
Functional Significance of Parietal-Prefrontal Collaboration
3
Long-Term Memory and “Off-Line” Processing: Prefrontal-Limbic Connections
31
Role of Hippocampus in Spatial Memory
32
Multiple Connections Between Principal Sulcus and Hippocampal Formation
33
Quadripartite Neural Network: Parietal-Temporal-Cingulate-Prefrontal Circuit
34
Limbic Contribution to Spatial Memory
4
Response Initiation and Inhibition: Projections to Striatum, Tectum, Thalamus, and Premotor Cortex
41
Motor-Control Functions of Prefrontal Cortex
42
Cortical-Striatal Pathway and Related Feedback Loops
43
Cortical-Tectal Pathway
44
Thalamic-Cortical Systems
45
Prefrontal-Premotor Connections: Anterior Supplementary Motor Cortex Relays
46
Functional Speculations
5
Modulatory Mechanisms: Brain Stem Catecholamine Projections
51
Activation of Cognitive Machinery
52
Concentration and Synthesis of Catecholamines in Primate Cortex
53
Brain Stem Innervation of Prefrontal Cortex
54
Delayed-Response Deficits and Recovery Produced by Catecholamine Loss and Replacement in Prefrontal Cortex
55
Circuit Basis for Neuromodulation in Principal Sulcus
6
Multiple Subsystems of Prefrontal Cortex: Unity or Diversity of Function
61
Unity or Diversity of Prefrontal Function
62
Frontal Eye Fields
63
Inferior Convexity
64
Orbital Prefrontal Cortices
65
Problem of Integration
7
Diseases Affecting Prefrontal Cortex
71
Schizophrenia: Loss of Corticocortical Processing and Regulation of Behavior by Representational Knowledge
72
Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome: Loss of Thalamocortical and Brain Stem Modulatory Mechanisms
73
Huntington's Chorea and Parkinson's Disease: Loss of Prefrontal-Striatal Mechanisms and Initiation or Inhibition of Motor Response
74
Overview of Neurobiology of Disease
8
Summary
TL;DR: It is concluded that social neuroscience paradigms provide reliable and accurate insights into complex social phenomena such as empathy and that meta-analyses of previous studies are a valuable tool in this endeavor.
TL;DR: The present study used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate potential neural substrates of self-referential processing and suggests that self- Referential processing is functionally dissociable from other forms of semantic processing within the human brain.
Abstract: Researchers have long debated whether knowledge about the self is unique in terms of its functional anatomic representation within the human brain. In the context of memory function, knowledge about the self is typically remembered better than other types of semantic information. But why does this memorial effect emerge? Extending previous research on this topic (see Craik et al., 1999), the present study used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate potential neural substrates of self-referential processing. Participants were imaged while making judgments about trait adjectives under three experimental conditions (self-relevance, other-relevance, or case judgment). Relevance judgments, when compared to case judgments, were accompanied by activation of the left inferior frontal cortex and the anterior cingulate. A separate region of the medial prefrontal cortex was selectively engaged during self-referential processing. Collectively, these findings suggest that self-referential processing is functionally dissociable from other forms of semantic processing within the human brain.
TL;DR: The degree to which the self is implicated in processing personal information was investigated in this paper, where subjects rated adjectives on four tasks designed to force varying kinds of encoding: structural, phonemic, semantic, and self-reference.
Abstract: The degree to which the self is implicated in processing personal information was investigated. Subjects rated adjectives on four tasks designed to force varying kinds of encoding: structural, phonemic, semantic, and self-reference. In two experiments, incidental recall of the rated words indicated that adjectives rates under the self-reference task were recalled the best. These results indicate that self-reference is a rich and powerful encoding process. As an aspect of the human information-processing system, the self appears to function as a superordinate schema that is deeply involved in the processing, interpretation, and memory of personal information.