Topic
Scientific priority
About: Scientific priority is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 11 publications have been published within this topic receiving 42 citations.
Papers
TL;DR: Dr. Howard Markel writes that as a profession, doctors are not only determined, but also somewhat obsessed with primacy and quite comfortable with intense competition.
Abstract: Dr. Howard Markel writes that as a profession, doctors are not only determined, but also somewhat obsessed with primacy and quite comfortable with intense competition.
12 citations
TL;DR: This commentary focuses on scientific priority two and future directions in measurement science, technology, data infrastructure, behavioral ontologies, and big data methods and analytics that have the potential to transform the behavioral and social sciences into more cumulative, data rich sciences that more efficiently build on prior research.
Abstract: The National Institutes of Health Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR) recently released its strategic plan for 2017-2021. This plan focuses on three equally important strategic priorities: 1) improve the synergy of basic and applied behavioral and social sciences research, 2) enhance and promote the research infrastructure, methods, and measures needed to support a more cumulative and integrated approach to behavioral and social sciences research, and 3) facilitate the adoption of behavioral and social sciences research findings in health research and in practice. This commentary focuses on scientific priority two and future directions in measurement science, technology, data infrastructure, behavioral ontologies, and big data methods and analytics that have the potential to transform the behavioral and social sciences into more cumulative, data rich sciences that more efficiently build on prior research. (PsycINFO Database Record
12 citations
TL;DR: To the Editor: The Perspective article by Markel (Dec. 30 issue) contains two incorrect assertions.
Abstract: To the Editor: The Perspective article by Markel (Dec. 30 issue)1 contains two incorrect assertions. Galen, perhaps the first physician to base medicine on nature rather than on miracles or metaphy...
8 citations
TL;DR: The commonly accepted practice in recognizing the scientific priority of a discovery requires finding a hitherto unknown phenomenon, publishing it to other scholars and doing it for the first time, and this finding fulfills all the conditions necessary for the recognition of the scientific discovery.
Abstract: The commonly accepted practice in recognizing the scientific priority of a discovery requires finding a hitherto unknown phenomenon, publishing it to other scholars and doing it for the first time. And this is what happened regarding the discovery of the intracranial fluid presence by the Venetian anatomist Massa in 1536. This finding fulfills all the conditions necessary for the recognition of the scientific discovery.
4 citations
Related Topics (5)
Performance Metrics
| Year | Papers |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 |
| 2018 | 1 |
| 2017 | 1 |
| 2013 | 1 |
| 2009 | 1 |
| 2005 | 3 |