TL;DR: Rotationplasty was not associated with any disadvantages with regard to function or quality of life in comparison with endoprosthetic replacement and it is possible that the psychosocial outcome is influenced by the fact that patients who have a rotationplasty know that additional operative intervention is not usually necessary.
Abstract: Background: The present study was performed to determine whether there is a difference, with regard to functional outcome and quality of life, between endoprosthetic replacement and rotationplasty for the treatment of malignant tumors of the distal part of the femur or the proximal part of the tibia. Methods: Sixty-seven patients, between the ages of eleven and twenty-four years at the time of the diagnosis, had a malignant tumor of the distal part of the femur or the proximal part of the tibia. A rotationplasty was performed in thirty-three patients, and an endoprosthetic replacement was done in thirty-four patients. The median duration of follow-up was six years and one month (range, two years to sixteen years and two months). The scale developed by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society was used to evaluate the functional results. Quality-of-life issues were assessed with the questionnaire developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Results: The patients who had had a rotationplasty had a mean functional score, according to the system of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society, of 24 points, and the patients who had had an endoprosthetic replacement had a mean score of 25 points. This difference was not found to be significant, with the numbers available (p = 0.47). Only one patient who had had a rotationplasty used an assistive device when walking long distances, whereas six patients who had had an endoprosthetic replacement used an assistive device. This difference was significant (p < 0.001). The quality-of-life questionnaire revealed that the patients who had had a rotationplasty could participate in hobbies such as carpentry and sports as well as in other daily activities to a significantly greater degree than those who had had an endoprosthetic replacement (p = 0.001). Restriction in daily activities due to pain was significantly less common in the group that had had a rotationplasty than it was in the group that had had an endoprosthetic replacement (p = 0.047). Conclusions: Rotationplasty was not associated with any disadvantages with regard to function or quality of life in comparison with endoprosthetic replacement. It is possible that the psychosocial outcome is influenced by the fact that patients who have a rotationplasty know that additional operative intervention is not usually necessary. Despite good functional and quality-of-life results, the cosmetic appearance may be the most serious disadvantage of rotationplasty. The decision to perform this procedure must be made on a case-by-case basis.
TL;DR: In patients with a tumor endoprosthesis with an infection associated with prosthesis, repeated revision surgery should be avoided and ablative surgery recommended at an early stage because of the high risk of limb salvage failure.
Abstract: Introduction: Infection associated with prosthesis used after tumor resection is a common and serious complication. The purpose of the current retrospective study was to describe the course of infection in patients with a tumor endoprosthesis and the determination of risk factors associated with failed limb salvage. Material and Methods: 30 patients with an infection associated with a tumor endoprosthesis were investigated with regard to treatment strategies, number and type of revision operations, duration of hospital stay, determination of risk factors associated with failed limb salvage and final outcome. Results: Limb salvage related to the complication infection was achieved in 19 patients (63.3%). Two-stage reimplantation of an endoprosthesis was successful in 14 patients but subsequently failed in one patient. Out of 11 patients where limb salvage failed, an amputation was performed in 6 patients, a rotationplasty in 4, and stump lengthening procedure in 1 patient. A poor soft tissue condition was a significant (P<0.05) risk factor for failed limb salvage. No patient receiving chemotherapy with a poor soft tissue condition had limb salvage surgery. The mean number of revision operations per patients was 2.6. The mean duration of hospital stay was 68 days. Conclusion: Infection associated with prosthesis is a serious complication and is involved with long hospitalization. Limb salvage failed mostly in the case of a poor soft tissue condition. In these cases repeated revision surgery should be avoided and ablative surgery recommended at an early stage. Rotationplasty is an alternative to amputation in the case of an infection of the proximal or distal part of the femur.
TL;DR: Most patients are candidates for limbsparing procedures because of effective chemotherapeutic agents and regimens, improved imaging modalities, and advances in reconstructive surgery.
Abstract: Amputation, once the mainstay of treatment of malignant bone tumors, now is used selectively and infrequently. Most patients are candidates for limb-sparing procedures because of effective chemotherapeutic agents and regimens, improved imaging modalities, and advances in reconstructive surgery. Patient age as well as tumor location and extent of disease help define the most appropriate surgical alternatives. Options for skeletal reconstruction include modular endoprostheses, osteoarticular or bulk allografts, allograft-prosthetic composites, vascularized bone grafts, arthrodesis, expandable prostheses, rotationplasty, and limb-lengthening techniques. Two key factors must be considered: survival rates should be no worse than those associated with amputation, and the reconstructed limb must provide satisfactory function. Functional outcome studies comparing limb-sparing procedures and amputation have inherent limitations, including the inability to randomize treatment and the subjective nature of important outcome measures.
TL;DR: The increase in limb salvage procedures and the better long term survival of patients results in a higher rate of immediate and delayed complications, and functional outcome after rotationplasty is superior to limb salvage reconstruction and amputation.
Abstract: One hundred thirty-six patients with non-metastatic high grade osteosarcoma treated from 1978 to 1994 in one institution with a multidisciplinary approach that included intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy were studied to evaluate which factors influence the outcome of modern orthopaedic therapy. Anatomic location, tumor volume, surgical margins, complications, and functional outcome were analyzed. Seventy-nine patients had a limb salvage procedure, 21 had a rotationplasty, and 33 had an amputation. Limb salvage consisted of 32 endoprostheses, 39 allograft replacements, six autograft replacements, and two shortening procedures. Three patients died during preoperative chemotherapy treatment. At a mean followup of 43 months, 81 patients continue to be disease free, three are alive after local recurrence, 17 are alive after having metastatic lesions, five are alive with metastatic lesions present, and 30 patients died of their disease. Forty-seven patients had pulmonary metastatic lesions, 14 had osseous metastatic lesions, three had abdominal metastatic lesions, two had lymphatic metastatic lesions, and eight patients had skip metastatic lesions. Prognosis correlated with chemotherapy response, surgical margins, and tumor volume. The minor complication rate for limb salvage was 4% and the major complication rate was 52%. Amputations had a 6% minor complication rate and 34% major complication rate. Rotationplasties had 10% minor and 48% major complication rates. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional evaluation after limb salvage showed that 23 (38%) patients had more than 75% of the maximum functional score, 34 (56%) were from 50% to 75%, and three (5%) less than 50%. Of the rotationplasties, six (67%) were functionally better than 75% and three (33%) were functionally better than from 50% to 75%. In the group of amputations, 13 (56%) were from 50% to 75%, and 10 (44%) less than 50%. The extent of preoperative necrosis, surgical margins, and tumor volume are the most important prognostic factors. The increase in limb salvage procedures and the better long term survival of patients results in a higher rate of immediate and delayed complications. Functional outcome after rotationplasty is superior to limb salvage reconstruction and amputation.
TL;DR: Comparison of functional mobility and quality of life is performed in patients with lower‐extremity bone sarcoma following either amputation, limb‐sparing surgery, or rotationplasty with four different types of outcome measures.