TL;DR: The fossil record indicates that the Monoplacophora gave rise to the Gastropoda, Cephalopoda, Rostroconchia, and possibly Polyplacophoras, and that the Pelecypoda and Scaphopoda are derived from the Rostroconschia.
Abstract: Stasek (1) theorized that the extant mollusks are the progeny of three separate lineages that separated before the phylum was well established. He wrote that no known intermediate forms, fossil or living, bridge the "enormous gaps between any two of the three lineages," and therefore treated each as a separate subphylum. These subphyla are (i) the subphylum Aculifera Hatscheck 1891, containing only the class Aplacophora, derived from the most primitive ancestors of the Mollusca; (ii) the subphylum Placophora von Jhering 1876, containing only the class Polyplacophora, and emphasizing the pseudometamerism of its more advanced premollusk ancestor; and (iii) the subphylum Conchifera Gegenbaur 1878, containing the Monoplacophora and the other classes derived from it. We point out that the Polyplacophora may be derived from the Monoplacophora instead of a more primitive ancestral stock. We also suggest that the Conchifera can be separated into two major lineages, each worthy of the rank of subphylum. The fossil record indicates that the Monoplacophora gave rise to the Gastropoda, Cephalopoda, Rostroconchia, and possibly Polyplacophora, and that the Pelecypoda and Scaphopoda are derived from the Rostroconchia. These last three classes thus form a lineage that diverged from the Monoplacophora in the Early Cambrian. They emphasized a shell form that in all groups is primitively open at both ends, allowing the gut to remain relatively straight, with an anterior mouth and posterior anus. They became burrowing (infaunal) deposit or filter feeders. We coin the term Diasoma (through-body) for the subphylum containing these three classes (Rostroconchia, Pelecypoda, and Scaphopoda). The remaining three classes (Monoplacophora, Gastropoda, and Cephalopoda) emphasize a conical univalved shell, usually twisted into a spiral. The relatively small single aperture forces the anus to lie close to the mouth, and the gut is bent into a "U." Most are surface-dwelling (epifaunal) grazers or carnivores. We coin the name Cyrtosoma (hunchback-body) for the subphylum containing these three classes. Strictly speaking, the cyrtosomes are the ancestors of the diasomes but, in fact, both subphyla appeared and began to diversify within a few million years in the Early Cambrian. Note added in proof: After proofs were corrected we were informed that the new genus Opikella (40) is preoccupied by (Opikella = Oepikella) Thorslund 1940, an Ordovican ostracod. We rename the mollusk genus Oepikila.
TL;DR: The affinities of a considerable part of the earliest skeletal fossils are problematical, but investigation of their microstructures may be useful for understanding biomineralization mechanisms in early metazoans and helpful for their taxonomy.
Abstract: The affinities of a considerable part of the earliest skeletal fossils are problematical, but investigation of their microstructures may be useful for understanding biomineralization mechanisms in early metazoans and helpful for their taxonomy. The skelet
TL;DR: Four Paleozoic bivalved genera are assigned to the new molluscan class Rostroconchia, which is regarded as more closely related to the Pelecypoda and Scaphopoda than to other known classes ofmollusks.
Abstract: Four Paleozoic bivalved genera are assigned to the new molluscan class Rostroconchia: Eopteria, Euchasma, Conocardium, and Pseudoconocardium. These mollusks have ani uncoiled univalved larval shell; an untorted bivalved adult shell; no hinge teeth, ligament, or adductor muscles; and a fused, almost inflexible. hinge. Rostroconchianis developed separately from the pelecypods through the ribeirioids, but are regarded as more closely related to the Pelecypoda and Scaphopoda than to other known classes of mollusks.
TL;DR: Nine monoplacophoran taxa and one bivalve are described from a late Middle Cambrian limestone lens in New Zealand and aspects of the Pojeta-Runnegar model for the early evolution of the Mollusca are critically appraised.
Abstract: Nine monoplacophoran taxa and one bivalve are described from a late Middle Cambrian limestone lens in New Zealand. Two new genera, Eurekapegma and Enigmaconus, and five new species, Obtusoconus foliaceus, Anabarella simesi, Eurekapegma cooperi, Enigmaconus parvus, and Protowenella cobbensis are named. Enigmaconus, a pegma-bearing monoplacophoran, is assigned to the new family Enigmaconidae within the order Cyrtonellida. Eurekapegma is assigned to the Stenothecidae Runnegar & Jell 1980. Pelagiellid monoplacophorans are assigned to a new order Pelagiellida. Aspects of the Pojeta-Runnegar model for the early evolution of the Mollusca are critically appraised. It is argued that Heraultipegma was not a rostroconch and that riberioid rostroconchs may have evolved from an Enigmaconus-like monoplacophoran as late as late Middle Cambrian. Evolution of bivalves from rostroconchs is rejected and replaced by the suggestion that bivalves are descended directly from monoplacophorans.