TL;DR: In this article, an attempt is made to define a geomagnetic storm as an interval of time when a sufficiently intense and long-lasting interplanetary convection electric field leads, through a substantial energization in the magnetosphere-ionosphere system, to an intensified ring current sufficiently strong to exceed some key threshold of the quantifying storm time Dst index.
Abstract: After a brief review of magnetospheric and interplanetary phenomena for intervals with enhanced solar wind-magnetosphere interaction, an attempt is made to define a geomagnetic storm as an interval of time when a sufficiently intense and long-lasting interplanetary convection electric field leads, through a substantial energization in the magnetosphere-ionosphere system, to an intensified ring current sufficiently strong to exceed some key threshold of the quantifying storm time Dst index. The associated storm/substorm relationship problem is also reviewed. Although the physics of this relationship does not seem to be fully understood at this time, basic and fairly well established mechanisms of this relationship are presented and discussed. Finally, toward the advancement of geomagnetic storm research, some recommendations are given concerning future improvements in monitoring existing geomagnetic indices as well as the solar wind near Earth.
TL;DR: In this article, an algorithm is presented for predicting the ground-based Dst index solely from a knowledge of the velocity and density of the solar wind and the north-south solar magnetospheric component of the interplanetary magnetic field.
Abstract: An algorithm is presented for predicting the ground-based Dst index solely from a knowledge of the velocity and density of the solar wind and the north-south solar magnetospheric component of the interplanetary magnetic field. The three key elements of this model are an adjustment for solar wind dynamic pressure, an injection rate linearly proportional to the dawn-to-dusk component of the interplanetary electric field which is zero for electric fields below 0.5 mV m−1, and an exponential decay rate of the ring current with an e folding time of 7.7 hours. The algorithm is used to predict the Dst signature of seven geomagnetic storm intervals in 1967 and 1968. In addition to being quite successful, considering the simplicity of the model, the algorithm pinpoints the causes of various types of storm behavior. A main phase is initiated whenever the dawn-to-dusk solar magnetospheric component of the interplanetary electric field becomes large and positive. It is preceded by an initial phase of increased Dst if the solar wind dynamic pressure increases suddenly prior to the main phase. The recovery phase is initiated when the injection rate governed by the interplanetary electric field drops below the ring current decay rate associated with the ring current strength built up during the main phase. Variable recovery rates are generally due to additional injection during the recovery phase. This one algorithm accounts for magnetospheric behavior at quiet and at disturbed times and seems capable of predicting the behavior of Dst during even the largest of storms.
TL;DR: Tsyganenko et al. as discussed by the authors developed a dynamical model of the storm-time geomagnetic field in the inner magnetosphere, using space magnetometer data taken during 37 major events in 1996-2000 and concurrent observations of the solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF).
Abstract: [1] This work builds on and extends our previous effort (Tsyganenko et al, 2003) to develop a dynamical model of the storm-time geomagnetic field in the inner magnetosphere, using space magnetometer data taken during 37 major events in 1996–2000 and concurrent observations of the solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) The essence of the approach is to derive from the data the temporal variation of all major current systems contributing to the distant geomagnetic field during the entire storm cycle, using a simple model of their growth and decay Each principal source of the external magnetic field (magnetopause, cross-tail current sheet, axisymmetric and partial ring currents, and Birkeland current systems) is driven by a separate variable, calculated as a time integral of a combination of geoeffective parameters NλVβBsγ, where N, V, and Bs are the solar wind density, speed, and the magnitude of the southward component of the IMF, respectively In this approach we assume that each source has its individual relaxation timescale and residual quiet-time strength, and its partial contribution to the total field depends on the entire history of the external driving of the magnetosphere during a storm In addition, the magnitudes of the principal field sources were assumed to saturate during extremely large storms with abnormally strong external driving All the parameters of the model field sources, including their magnitudes, geometrical characteristics, solar wind/IMF driving functions, decay timescales, and saturation thresholds, were treated as free variables, and their values were derived from the data As an independent consistency test, we calculated the expected Dst variation on the basis of the model output at Earth's surface and compared it with the actual observed Dst A good agreement (cumulative correlation coefficient R = 092) was found, in spite of the fact that ∼90% of the spacecraft data used in the fitting were taken at synchronous orbit and beyond, while only 37% of those data came from distances 25 ≤ R ≤ 4 RE The obtained results demonstrate the possibility to develop a truly dynamical model of the magnetic field, based on magnetospheric and interplanetary data and allowing one to reproduce and forecast the entire process of a geomagnetic storm, as it unfolds in time and space
TL;DR: In this article, a hydromagnetic theory is presented which explains the average characteristics of geomagnetic storms and the recovery from the main phase is attributed to the relief of the stress on the magnetic field by the transfer of the energy of the trapped protons to neutral hydrogen by means of ion-atom charge exchange.
Abstract: A hydromagnetic theory is presented which explains the average characteristics of geomagnetic storms. The magnetic storm is caused by a sudden increase in the intensity of the solar wind. Stresses are then set up in the geomagnetic field by the solar plasma impinging upon the geomagnetic field and becoming trapped in it. These stresses, which are propagated to the earth as hydromagnetic waves, account for the observed average magnetic storm variations. The sudden commencement of the magnetic storm is due to a hydromagnetic wave generated by the impact of the solar plasma on the geomagnetic field. The initial phase of the magnetic storm, during which the magnetic field is above average intensity, is due to the increased solar wind pressure. During the initial phase, instability causes small plasma clouds to become imbedded in the magnetic field. They break up and diffuse into the magnetic field to form a belt of trapped particles from the sun (principally protons and electrons). The trapped protons set up stresses, mainly due to centrifugal force, which account for the main phase of the magnetic storm. The recovery from the main phase is attributed to the relief of the stress on the geomagnetic field by the transfer of the energy of the trapped protons to neutral hydrogen by means of ion-atom charge exchange. The correct recovery time for the magnetic storm is predicted from the measured cross section of the ion-atom charge-exchange process and the hydrogen density values around the earth deduced from the scattering of solar Lyman-α radiation.
TL;DR: In this paper, the interplanetary energy flux is estimated on the basis of the Poynting flux and its variations with the rate of energy dissipation in terms of: (1) the ring-current particle injection, (2) Joule dissipation, and (3) auroral particle injection for 15 major geomagnetic storms.
Abstract: The interplanetary energy flux is estimated on the basis of the Poynting flux and its variations with the rate of energy dissipation in terms of: (1) the ring-current particle injection, (2) Joule dissipation in the ionosphere, and (3) auroral particle injection for 15 major geomagnetic storms. A relationship, in terms of the angle between the interplanetary magnetic field vector and the magnetospheric field vector, is defined by which the growth of geomagnetic storms is closely associated with the Poynting flux. It is found that the energy flux that enters the magnetosphere is dissipated through intramagnetospheric substorm processes. Geomagnetic storm phenomena represent the combined influence of such effects.