TL;DR: The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness was adopted in 2005 and reaffirmed in Accra in 2008 at ministerial-level forums convened by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness was adopted in 2005 and reaffirmed in Accra in 2008 at ministerial-level forums convened by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The principles and indicators included in the Paris Declaration frame what OECD calls a “landmark reform” in development cooperation endorsed by leading development practitioners. The Paris Declaration did not emerge from the United Nations or any of its bodies, but given the high level of support that the Declaration has received from the major bilateral donors and the active engagement of key multilateral organizations such as the World Bank and OECD itself in its implementation, it is important to analyse it from the point of view of the right to development.
TL;DR: The role of the social sciences in human rights and social sciences is discussed in this article, where the authors propose a theory of human rights in the twenty-first century, based on the rise and fall of natural rights.
Abstract: Acknowledgements Chapter 1: Introduction: thinking about human rightsRealities, Concepts, The social sciences, Beyond human rights law, ConclusionChapter 2 Origins: the rise and fall of natural rightsWhy history? On rights and tyrants, Justice and rights, Natural rights, The age of revolutions, The decline of natural rights Chapter 3 After 1945: the new age of rightsThe UN and the human rights revival, The Universal Declaration, From theory to practice: (a)The Cold War, (b)After the Cold War, ConclusionChapter 4 Theories of human rightsWhy theory? Human rights theory: (a) Rights (b) Other values (c) Human nature (d) Conflicts of rights (e) Democracy (f) ConclusionChapter 5 The role of the social sciencesIntroduction: human rights and social science, The dominance of law, Political science, Sociology, Psychology, Anthropology, International relations, ConclusionChapter 6 Universality, diversity and difference: culture and human rights The problem of cultural imperialism, Cultural relativism, Minority rights, Indigenous peoples, The right to self-determination, The rights of women Chapter 7 Idealism, realism and repression: the politics of human rightsThe real politics of human rights, The boomerang theory, The national politics of human rights, The statistics of human rights, NGOs in world politicsChapter 8 Development and Globalization: economics and human rightsDevelopment versus human rights? The right to development, Globalization, International financial institutions, Economic and social rightsChapter 9 Conclusion: human rights in the twenty-first centuryLearning from history, Objections to human rights, Problems of intervention, Concluding remarksReferences Index
TL;DR: The Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar (myanmar Mechanism) as mentioned in this paper was created by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in order to support the Universal Periodic Review (UPR).
Abstract: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR's) Geneva headquarters incorporates the following three divisions: Human Rights Council and Treaty Mechanisms; Thematic Engagement, Special Procedures and Right to Development; and Field Operations and Technical Co-operation. OHCHR offers support and expertise to the UN's human rights monitoring mechanisms, including the Human Rights Council and the Universal Periodic Review (which assesses, cyclically, the human rights situation in all UN member states). In 2021 OHCHR was supporting eight independent investigations that had been authorized by the Human Rights Council. During September the CoI transferred its collected evidence on alleged atrocities perpetrated within Myanmar to a new Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar (the 'Myanmar Mechanism'-authorized by the Human Rights Council in September 2018), which was tasked with preparing files to be the basis of future criminal prosecutions under international law.
TL;DR: The authors argue that the statehood-by-2011 program cannot succeed either as the midwife of independence or as a strategy for Palestinian economic development, due to its inability to deliver sustainable and equitable economic growth worldwide, but also because neoliberal "governance" under occupation, however "good," cannot substitute for the broader struggle for national rights nor ensure the Palestinian right to development.
Abstract: The Palestinian statehood-by-2011 program, framed through neoliberal institution building, redefines and diverts the Palestinian liberation struggle. Focusing on its economic aspects, and in particular the underlying neoliberal thought that goes beyond narrow economic policy applications, this essay argues that the program cannot succeed either as the midwife of independence or as a strategy for Palestinian economic development. Its weaknesses, the authors contend, derive not only from neoliberalism9s inability to deliver sustainable and equitable economic growth worldwide, but also because neoliberal "governance" under occupation, however "good," cannot substitute for the broader struggle for national rights nor ensure the Palestinian right to development.