TL;DR: The concept of reverse innovation as mentioned in this paper refers to the case where an innovation is adopted first in poor (emerging) economies before "trickling up" to rich countries, and it raises interesting theoretical questions, such as what kinds of innovation emerging economies are likely to spawn, why such innovations might diffuse to richer countries, what competitive advantages local and foreign firms enjoy in this process, and how it affects the global strategy and organization of established MNEs.
Abstract: ‘Reverse innovation’ refers to the case where an innovation is adopted first in poor (emerging) economies before ‘trickling up’ to rich countries. Although examples of reverse innovation are still rare, it raises interesting theoretical questions, such as what kinds of innovation emerging economies are likely to spawn, why such innovations might diffuse to rich countries, what competitive advantages local and foreign firms enjoy in this process, and how it affects the global strategy and organization of established MNEs. Research on reverse innovation can enrich and extend mainstream theories of innovation, internationalization, MNE management, and FDI spillovers.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used Swiss weighing-instrument manufacturer Mettler Toledo as a case example to show that frugal innovations are largely developed by local R&D subsidiaries of Western firms in emerging countries.
Abstract: OVERVIEW:The quality and number of innovations developed by multinational companies from emerging countries is increasing dramatically. In particular, frugal innovations—“good-enough,” affordable products that meet the needs of resource-constrained consumers—have created tremendous demand in emerging markets. While the development of such products has largely been the domain of local corporations in emerging countries, Western corporations have recently started to engage in frugal innovation as well. This is a difficult task for Western firms, however, because their business models and organizational structures are traditionally designed for the development of advanced products for the affluent few at the top of the economic pyramid. Using Swiss weighing-instrument manufacturer Mettler Toledo as a case example, this article suggests that frugal innovations are largely developed by local R&D subsidiaries of Western firms in emerging countries. A substantial degree of autonomy for those local R&D subsidiari...
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors define three criteria for frugal innovation: substantial cost reduction, concentration on core functionalities, and optimised performance level, based on the results of a literature review and interviews with 45 managers from companies and researchers from different research institutes.
Abstract: Recently, the innovation management literature has witnessed a rising interest in the so-called frugal innovation. The term was initially discussed in the context of emerging markets, giving non-affluent customers opportunities to consume affordable products and services suited to their needs. However, the meaning of frugal innovation is fuzzy. Further, the increasing appearance of frugal innovation in developed markets challenges earlier definitions that often characterised frugal innovation particularly in the context of emerging markets. So far, it has not been clear what differentiates frugal innovation from other innovation types. Thus, we need criteria that make it possible to determine what frugal innovation is and what is not. In order to determine a clear definition, we choose a multimethod approach, conduct a literature review, and interview 45 managers from companies and researchers from different research institutes. On the basis of the results, we define three criteria for frugal innovation: substantial cost reduction, concentration on core functionalities, and optimised performance level. We contribute to the literature by refining the meaning of frugal innovation. We also enable organisations to better deal with the challenge of developing frugal innovation in both emerging and developed markets.
TL;DR: In this article, the relationship between frugal and reverse innovation and sustainability remains largely unexplored in the literature, and the authors aim to fill in this gap and answer the research question: How can frugaling and reverse innovations strengthen sustainable development, and how can business models in this context be systemized and described? Employing a multiple case study design, a total of 59 frugual products and services were investigated from a business models and sustainability strategy perspective from June 2014 until June 2015.
TL;DR: In this paper, different types of resource-constrained innovation-cost, good-enough, frugal, and reverse innovation-conceptualizes the distinctions between them, and discusses the implications for strategy providing a framework for managers to systematically analyze their own approaches to resource-consistency innovation and craft proper development processes.
Abstract: Product and service innovations aimed at resource-constrained customers in emerging markets have recently attracted much research and management attention. Despite the prominence of this topic, however, there are some misconceptions around the different innovation types in this domain that may limit managers' ability to derive informed implications for strategy and operations. This article analyzes the different types of resource-constrained innovation-cost, good-enough, frugal, and reverse innovation-conceptualizes the distinctions between them, and discusses the implications for strategy providing a framework for managers to systematically analyze their own approaches to resource-constrained innovation and craft proper development processes. By highlighting the differences between the various types of resourceconstrained innovation, this article also provides the conceptual grounds for further systematic research.