TL;DR: In the first movement of the B-flat minor sonata, Rosen argued that the dots at the double measure after the grave are a serious error, and that excluding the grave from the repeat of the entire exposition makes awkward nonsense of an important moment in the opening movement as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Thirty years ago, Edward T. Cone remarked that the repeat sign in the fifth measure of the first movement of Chopin's B-flat Minor Sonata resuits "in nonsense."' More recently, Charles Rosen argued that the dots at the double measure after the grave are "a serious error," and that excluding the grave from the repeat of the entire exposition "makes awkward nonsense of an important moment in the opening movement."2 This argument has been then iterated in Rosen's new book,3 supported by Jeffrey Kallberg,4 and recently advocated in the National Edition of the Works of Fryderyk Chopin, edited by Jan Ekier;5 the notion is certainly gaining momentum. The problem of whether or not the grave should be restated along with the repeat of the exposition warrants some serious deliberations. For the performer, the newly advocated return to the first measure would change the character of the unfolding drama in the first movement of the sonata. For the teacher, arguing against the repeat sign after the grave means a dispute with the majority of moder editions. And this problem will certainly have to be addressed in The Complete Chopin: A New Critical Edition, now being prepared by Peters (London).6
TL;DR: In this article, a RAM 35 is stored with, for each measure, a unit music data file comprising a measure number specifying a measure and music data thereof, and a musical score element data file including measure number and a type of a repeat sign included in the measure.
Abstract: PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To properly reproduce a piece of music by reading out music data included in music data files, measure by measure, based upon repeat signs.SOLUTION: A RAM 35 is stored with, for each measure, a unit music data file comprising a measure number specifying a measure and music data thereof, and a musical score element data file including a measure number and a type of a repeat sign included in the measure. A CPU 31 detects a repeat sign for a unit music data file associated with generation of a musical sound by reference to a musical score element data file, and determines a unit music data file to be read out next based upon the repeat sign.
TL;DR: A musical score display device and method employing a controller that is configured to control a display to display a musical score and a first time axis corresponding to a performance of the musical score in which at least one repeat part of the music is played during the performance, or a second time axis representing the score including at least 1 repeat sign.
Abstract: A musical score display device and method employing a controller that is configured to control a display to display a musical score and, with the musical score, a first time axis corresponding to a performance of the musical score in which at least one repeat part of the musical score is played during the performance, or a second time axis corresponding to the musical score including at least one repeat sign.